- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
- Messages
- 2,855 (2.81/day)
- Location
- Knoxville, TN, USA
System Name | Work Computer | Unfinished Computer |
---|---|
Processor | Core i7-6700 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
Motherboard | Dell Q170 | Gigabyte Aorus Elite Wi-Fi |
Cooling | A fan? | Truly Custom Loop |
Memory | 4x4GB Crucial 2133 C17 | 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 3600 C26 |
Video Card(s) | Dell Radeon R7 450 | RTX 2080 Ti FE |
Storage | Crucial BX500 2TB | TBD |
Display(s) | 3x LG QHD 32" GSM5B96 | TBD |
Case | Dell | Heavily Modified Phanteks P400 |
Power Supply | Dell TFX Non-standard | EVGA BQ 650W |
Mouse | Monster No-Name $7 Gaming Mouse| TBD |
Looking at the result above, it seems that P-cores are about 10% more efficient than Zen 3, at 50w at least. Interesting! I would love to know how that compares across various wattages!Here you goView attachment 257695
Nope, only det0x is comparing apples to oranges, since he picked the score of 8 GC cores at 65w and compared it to 16 zen 3 cores at 50w. Of course afterwards I did the same, to point exactly what you just described, the cherrypicking.
I only wanted to see if core for core zen 3 or GC is more efficient, and the results speak for themselves I think, 8 GC cores slam the 8 zen 3 cores both in performance and efficiency. There is no wattage point that zen 3 do better than 8 GC cores. Heck, im not even sure Zen 4 can do better at this point.
Also, det0x did give the oranges above his apples comparison
![Wink ;) ;)](https://tpucdn.com/forums/data/assets/smilies/wink-v1.gif)