• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Crytek's Neon Noir Raytracing Benchmark Results

Flashed 5700 with XT vbios incase anyone wanted to see what one could do. Yes GPU model reads XT, this happens after flash with all apps ofc.

Settings etc:
RX 5700 Duel Fan flashed to equivalent XT vbios, "default" clocks (after flash 2020mhz no clue why it defaults this high, but perfectly stable), -50ish undervolted to 1161mv, +50 Power, default 875 memory

1080p Ultra fullscreen

Neon_Noir_1080pUltra_FirstRun_RX5700FlashedXT.png

1/2 performance in Ray Tracing benchmark as 2080ti for 1/4 cost, i'm happy with that.

First post here, heyo :peace:
 
GPU 160+ mhz 500mhz+ mem @ 4.9ghz ultra FHD
N N Ultra GPU.jpg

GPU 160+ mhz 500mhz+ mem @ 4.9ghz very high FHD
N N Very High GPU.png
 
Ryzen 5 1600 @3.8Ghz
ASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1660TI GPU OC @2115Mhz - Memory OC @13108Mhz


1080 Ultra:

Screenshot (10).png
 
Last edited:
1080p, fullscreen - 3700x - MSI RTX 2060 Super Armor OC:
Crytek-Neon_Noir-Benchmark-1080p-9555.jpg
 
Last edited:
1680x1050 Res Sadly this PC isnt hooked up to 1080P, everything at stock!

used about 6 of the 12 threads of the i7 970 at max 50% per core, not really CPU bound at all this benchmark which makes sense .

crytek benchmark.jpg
 
Windows 7

1920x1080

neonnoir 1920x1080 12-27-19.JPG



2560x1440

neonnoir 2560x1440 12-27-19.jpg
 
1080p ultra full screen

neon.png
 
Last edited:
1920x1080p:
Ultra settings
Unbenannt1080.png

2560x1440p:
Ultra settings
Unbenannt1.png

CPU is overclocked to 4.7Ghz.
GPU is not overclocked.
 
Last edited:
1080p Ultra, fullscreen

neon noir bench 1080p 10975.png
 
Vega 56 @ 1650 MHz / 1100 mV, HBM @ 940 MHz, 1080p Ultra, Full Screen, CPU Stock on X370 Chipset, RAM XMP 3200 C14

1579350953387.png
 
GTX1080 2265/12265
1080p 7992

That is a fantastic score for a 1080. Nice clocks! :toast:

Custom block? Mods?
 
That is a fantastic score for a 1080. Nice clocks! :toast:

Custom block? Mods?
I apologize for the google translator.
The video card looks like this:
IMG 20180709 180743.jpg
BIOS without a limit on power (thanks to the Palit representative for it). Used voltage 1,175V, replaced thermal paste with liquid metal. I opened the window to make it colder, winter helps well))
 
I9-9900K @ 5100/4700 HT Off
2x16Gb 4200 16-16-36-2T
2080TI 2175-2160 / 15600
1080p Ultra Оценка: 16 026
Снимок экрана (397).png
 
Last edited:
CPU: Intel Core i7-9700K
GPU: Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
SSD: WDC WDBA3V5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB

MBD: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

1591160072895.png


1591160265854.png
 
Sometimes I really think Intel has been sleeping the last 10 years....

1591198196015.png
 
new one for me stock AMD settings for both CPU/GPU it still takes a dump near the end where the drone is looking at the spent bullet cases but not as badly as my RX580 used

Neon Noir 3.jpg


and with some adjustment in Radeon setting like turning off AA and Aniso and Radeon Sharpening

Neon Noir 4.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here's my old school xeon and 980ti... haven't tried to push the 980ti on this one yet: and fullscreen ultra, nothing turned down.
noir.png
 
Last edited:
1591451580828.png


Decent for a budget laptop (was $999 last year). Looks to be performing on par with 980 TI desktops. I'm sure I can smash 6k if I overclock the GPU, that's with everything stock except cpu undervolted.

Bit surprised by how NVIDIA-leaning the results seem to be though. My laptop always outperforms a desktop 580, but 3200 vs 6000 seems like one hell of a gap between the two in this particular benchmark.

The Vega's aren't faring well either.

1591453228341.png


Can probably squeeze more than that, but that was just using afterburner's auto-scan.
 
Last edited:
A little GPU overclocking, 2560x1440 fullscreen Ultra.

neonnoir 6-7-20 2560x1440.jpg
 
2560x1440, Fullscreen, Ultra (previous post: 1920x1080, Fullscreen, Ultra)

1591541189234.png
 
Back
Top