• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Curious-looking AMD Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition with 4.30 GHz Boost Hits the Radar

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Hot on the heels of the Ryzen 7 4700G desktop APU reveal, a curious-looking processor reared its head on the Futuremark Database, named "AMD Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition," as unearthed by Thai PC enthusiast TUM_APISAK, who mentions that the chip is "Renoir" based, and likely a mobile part owing to its rather low nominal clock speed of 1.80 GHz, which can boost all the way up to 4.30 GHz. The chip has all 8 cores and 16 threads enabled.

Coming back to its clock speeds, the "Extreme Edition" appears to be a 100 MHz speed bump over the Ryzen 7 4800U, a 15-Watt part with 4.20 GHz max boost. The 45-Watt Ryzen 7 4800H has the same 4.20 GHz boost clock, but much higher 2.90 GHz nominal clocks. It hence stands to reason that this is a 15 W segment part, topping the 4800U, targeting ultraportables. Interestingly, a 15-Watt Renoir with these clock speeds was recently reported as the "Ryzen 9 4900U." We'll hear more in the coming weeks.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Somehow I get the impression AMD might pull a 'but this one goes up to eleven' stunt. We already have Ryzen 9... just watch them. 11 isn't far off and they have a reason to market higher core counts soon. It also fits in the ongoing trend of AMD copying nomenclature from the market leader.

Will Intel counter that with an i11? Looks pretty ridiculous :)
 
Yeah, isn’t “Extreme Edition” an Intel thing?
 
Will Intel counter that with an i11? Looks pretty ridiculous :)
Intel needs a new naming scheme. the iSeries followed C2D/C2Q. 10900K doesnt roll off the tongue easily and i doubt an i11 11900k is going to either or whatever they decide to call it. (assuming they would even do an i11)
 
The 4800H and HS are already dominating Intel's just released 14nm processors, this will just add insult to Intel's injury.
 
The 4800H and HS are already dominating Intel's just released 14nm processors, this will just add insult to Intel's injury.
Then there's the 4900H as well. Too bad Intel is dominating the gaming laptop market.

I'm impressed that an 8C 15 W beats a 6C 45 W.
 
Not enough money for marketing so they are, once again, making knockoffs of Intel’s product names to attract attention. I thought they changed their ways after dumping the x399 name for TRX40. Well here are again with AMD acting like a cheap knockoff.
 
Not enough money for marketing so they are, once again, making knockoffs of Intel’s product names to attract attention. I thought they changed their ways after dumping the x399 name for TRX40. Well here are again with AMD acting like a cheap knockoff.

Objectively, I don't see anything wrong using this naming convention though. There is no patent as such to say that nobody should use this naming convention. And in this case, the cheap knockoff is knocking or already knocked Intel off.
 
Back
Top