- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 9,819 (1.70/day)
- Location
- 04578
System Name | Old reliable |
---|---|
Processor | Intel 8700K @ 4.8 GHz |
Motherboard | MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC |
Cooling | Custom Water |
Memory | 32 GB Crucial Ballistix 3666 MHz |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 3080 10GB Suprim X |
Storage | 3x SSDs 2x HDDs |
Display(s) | ASUS VG27AQL1A x2 2560x1440 8bit IPS |
Case | Thermaltake Core P3 TG |
Audio Device(s) | Samson Meteor Mic / Generic 2.1 / KRK KNS 6400 headset |
Power Supply | Zalman EBT-1000 |
Mouse | Mionix NAOS 7000 |
Keyboard | Mionix |
@crazyeyesreaper
I believe you when you say, that the positions don't change that much. But when the spread between the results gets noticeable bigger, it becomes somewhat misleading for the less informed reader/buyer when he considers price to performance and he bases his buying decision on a 1-2K difference, when it reality the performance difference is much bigger.
Let's all hope that AMD is able to deliver something usefull in the coming months, for all of us who wish for more than 4 cores at a reasonable price point (platform wise).
Thing is 90% of users just buy what some random pleb recommends them. Example people still recommend the 212 Evo yet its been beaten by numerous competitors that cost less yet people still buy it. The sad state of affairs is that the majority dont care they buy a 212 Evo or they buy something from Corsair in terms of AIOs. The rest that do read the reviews then split the decision based on region and pricing 1-2C means nothing really. Most people buy something for 1 of 3 reasons. 1 performance (least likely), 2 how it looks, 3 brand loyalty.
Then again even if the performance gap widens a small amount on larger chips i run into the next issues. Mini-ITX based coolers for SFF systems. with Socket 2011 a few of those coolers will not work hell even some various Tower coolers do not support LGA2011 therefore cant review them. To be blunt to test all options and make everyone happy i would need to use LGA 115x / LGA2011 and eventually AM4.
Right now it takes about 10 hours to complete a review since i run all tests till completion or up to 15 mins. 45 mins per test x2 (stock and oc) 1.5 hrs x 4 tests so thats 6 hours not counting install / photos and write up adding just 1 other platform would technically double that work load to cover all bases and make everyone happy would push that upwards of 25 to 30 hours or so to cover everything properly. Essentially what I am saying is i would love to go further in depth to cover more and do more but eventually you hit a point where the work required becomes ridiculous. I have a day job and a life so I cover the greatest majority of users I can and that is Intel LGA115x for the time being.
Not to mention that since the cooler hierarchy doesn't change all that much between platforms means someone can still make an educated guess as to what they should be buying. Especially since you should always be reading more than one review. While I would say I offer a bit more than some reviewers out there I am by no means the definitive source as such. Users should always collate data to find the best possible option for their systems.