Feedback & Bug Reports for new Forums

[micropage7]

Deleted user?

yea, first i think the user deleted
just curious

 

[W1zzard]

Way back i deleted some few users by accident

 

[PLAfiller]

I just got awarded a trophy "Old School" for being a member for 3 years....that is SO awesome, this has to be the coolest forum I've seen. Impecable organization

 

[RCoon]

Gigabyte ad covering forum posts on the right

OS: Windows 7, 64bit
Browser: Chrome
Res: 1280x1024
No web filtering
No adblock
on work machine

EDIT: For some reason it works, but I can't reproduce the issue?

 

[W1zzard]

Gigabyte ad covering forum posts on the right

Yup, didn't think of that now using JPG banner which scales properly

 

[Ahhzz]

Went to drop a small JPG in a post, says "Uploads are not available".... Was in an "Edit" popup window. Working as intended? or Bug?

 

[FordGT90Concept]

Something in this URL causes it to change .co.uk to .co_uk breaking it:
http://www.amazon.co_uk/dp/B00BCSOXGQ/?tag=tec053-21

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00BCSOXGQ/ref=s9_simh_gw_p147_d0_i1?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=1WZ1NPZTQ4HGD9EZ5D9M&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=455344027&pf_rd_i=468294

"tag" doesn't exist at all in the URL so I assume whatever code is adding the "tag" is also breaking the ".co.uk"

It appears to only be Amazon's United Kingdom site doing it.

 

[micropage7]

anyone watch New Profile Posts

why later its like PM where many write there ask something

 

[95Viper]

I glance at them. However, I don't really dwell on them.

 

[krusha03]

I have noticed that for some reason amazon.co.uk links dont work and get changed to amazon.co_uk. Example

http://www.amazon.co_uk/dp/B00ALK1GFC/?tag=tec053-21

This has been happening for a while but never thought of reporting it

 

[W1zzard]

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00ALK1GFC/?tag=tec053-21

Should be fixed now

 

[krusha03]

Thanks, seems to be working now

 

[the54thvoid]

I've chosen to ignore a specific forum member who posts verbal diarrhea and it's fine in the actual forum pages. But if i click the 'discuss' option from the front page stories - I still see their posts and it defeats the purpose of ignoring an individual who posts reactive crap all day long. Any fix?

 

[Caring1]

Any fix?

Don't read the front page and go straight to the forum instead

 

[Caring1]

anyone watch New Profile Posts
View attachment 63185
why later its like PM where many write there ask something

I suspect that is a bug too.
It seems posts on your profile page are shown publicly in there like a feed, even showing replies from other members in conversation.

 

[Freezer]

BUGS.... get the flame thrower out!


I suspect the forum is using about:blank (firefox) for the background to edit a page and post a new thread. Okay, it is!! Just disabled my userstyle script within firefox. The script is to change the white background to dark and it's obviously interfering with this forum. Ok, I'll add this to the feedback/bug reports section.

@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);
@-moz-document url("about:blank") {
* {
background-color:#111111;
}
}

Also, when posting and editing.. tooltips are displayed directly BELOW and are covered up by the cursor. Suggest moving the tooltips above the specific tool a user is selecting.

Oh and WHERE are the CODE, QUOTE, URL tags? In the editors.

Oh and WHY is the "Post New Thread" all the way on the right hand side? Hold on... going to need to run to the store for donuts and coffee for this stuff. Bugs gallore.

The "Post New Thread" ought to be displayed over the "Title" (aka: Subject) of the thread and respectively change by a users localization (obviously, left or right reading).

 

[qubit]

Still seeing that page corruption intermittently, where a post to the forum then fixes it.

 

[theonedub]

W1zz, can you remove the confirmation page that comes up to Thank a user on the mobile app? It's a minor inconvenience but I'd really like to just be able to thank someone with one click just like I can from my PC.

Thanks!

 

[qubit]

W1zz, can you remove the confirmation page that comes up to Thank a user on the mobile app? It's a minor inconvenience but I'd really like to just be able to thank someone with one click just like I can from my PC.

Thanks!

+1 to that.

 

[W1zzard]

W1zz, can you remove the confirmation page that comes up to Thank a user on the mobile app? It's a minor inconvenience but I'd really like to just be able to thank someone with one click just like I can from my PC.

Thanks!

what confirmation page?

 

[qubit]

Tapping the Thanks button take you to a page showing an "are you sure?" message for the thanks. It's not present on the PC and is unnecessary on the app.

 

[Freezer]

BUGS.... get the flame thrower out!


I suspect the forum is using about:blank (firefox) for the background to edit a page and post a new thread. Okay, it is!! Just disabled my userstyle script within firefox. The script is to change the white background to dark and it's obviously interfering with this forum. Ok, I'll add this to the feedback/bug reports section.

@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);
@-moz-document url("about:blank") {
* {
background-color:#111111;
}
}

Also, when posting and editing.. tooltips are displayed directly BELOW and are covered up by the cursor. Suggest moving the tooltips above the specific tool a user is selecting.

Oh and WHERE are the CODE, QUOTE, URL tags? In the editors.

Oh and WHY is the "Post New Thread" all the way on the right hand side? Hold on... going to need to run to the store for donuts and coffee for this stuff. Bugs gallore.

The "Post New Thread" ought to be displayed over the "Title" (aka: Subject) of the thread and respectively change by a users localization (obviously, left or right reading).

I resolved my issue with Techpowerup.com using about:blank as the forum editing box, but certain there is alternative method for this forum software to use something other than about:blank.

Anyway, added the following to script above:

@-moz-document regexp("https?://(?!([^.]+\\.)?techpowerup\\.com[/:]).*")

Though the other forum issues are still evident and server side.

 

[brandonwh64]

Having bad latency to techpowerup.com
started dropping out of teamspeak then tried to come here to show my findings and it took 4 retrys to load.

 

[Steevo]

Any chance of getting a front page poll for PC gamers that also own and game on consoles, and the generation of console?

Why you may ask? Well, with the recent GameWorks fiasco blowing up it would be useful information if someone were to say, test some hardware scenarios, and useful in stating factually that support of game developers by hardware manufacturers in closed ways may not be the best way for the gaming community.

I theorize that many (my current guess is 50-70%) of PC gamers are console gamers as well, and that many are purchasing games on the console and PC simultaneously, and possibly harming the overall gaming community by inadvertently furthering the release of poorly coded/ported titles, as well as supporting by far too many close sourced projects that hinder the overall expansion of gaming in general and specifically the PC gaming community.

Why does it matter? Every time one of the many of us purchase a game, we are giving our nod of approval and our hard earned money to a studio that will usually reinvest this into new games of the same core type being made. When a game is developed using closed source software which only one of the hardware companies is able to optimize for, and or contains code that artificially limits the performance of competing hardware we are showing approval and support of monopolistic practices/anti-competitive behavior.

 

[FreedomEclipse]

Any chance of getting a front page poll for PC gamers that also own and game on consoles, and the generation of console?

Why you may ask? Well, with the recent GameWorks fiasco blowing up it would be useful information if someone were to say, test some hardware scenarios, and useful in stating factually that support of game developers by hardware manufacturers in closed ways may not be the best way for the gaming community.

I theorize that many (my current guess is 50-70%) of PC gamers are console gamers as well, and that many are purchasing games on the console and PC simultaneously, and possibly harming the overall gaming community by inadvertently furthering the release of poorly coded/ported titles, as well as supporting by far too many close sourced projects that hinder the overall expansion of gaming in general and specifically the PC gaming community.

Why does it matter? Every time one of the many of us purchase a game, we are giving our nod of approval and our hard earned money to a studio that will usually reinvest this into new games of the same core type being made. When a game is developed using closed source software which only one of the hardware companies is able to optimize for, and or contains code that artificially limits the performance of competing hardware we are showing approval and support of monopolistic practices/anti-competitive behavior.

Just read up on this - I partially find it funny that AMD and Crytek are partnered up - Neither are doing that well financially, Crytek probably being a few more steps into the grave than AMD and AMD would have long been buried if it wasnt for their GPU department. I guess it was a 'for lack of a better option' choice for Crytek as they are nearing the end of their road and AMD turning to Crytek and giving them the pep talk by saying "shit or bust.... it's now or never....." before they both go over the top and into nomans land under a hail of artillery and gunfire


I think its shitty what Nvidia are trying to do, forcing people to pick sides like that but what are you going to do when one company has more money than its competitors?



Some would say its almost as if AMD and Crytek were made for each other.