• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Gigabyte GTX 980 Ti Waterforce Xtreme Gaming 6 GB

lanq8

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Apologies if I missed it in the review but how effective is the waterblock cooling on the VRM compared to an air cooled card as well the hybrid cooling cards from EVGA and MSI / Corsair?
 

iO

Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
531 (0.12/day)
Location
Germany
Processor R7 5700x
Motherboard MSI B450i Gaming
Cooling Accelero Mono CPU Edition
Memory 16 GB VLP
Video Card(s) RX 7900 GRE Dual
Storage P34A80 512GB
Display(s) LG 27UM67 UHD
Case none
Power Supply Fractal Ion 650 SFX
Bit too pricey but nice card.
And the baseplate is definitely not a vapor chamber..
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,988 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
And the baseplate is definitely not a vapor chamber..
I took another look, you seem to be right, it's just a thick copper plate
 

henrickd

New Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2015
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
I took another look, you seem to be right, it's just a thick copper plate
Hey W1zzard if you do not mind, can you please answer a question I had while reading this review? I was wondering, is the 970 SLI really that much better than reference 980 Ti, and basically equal to this highly factory overclocked 980 Ti? Since the reference 970 is so rare, I see here that you are using some non-reference 970s that you set at stock to simulate a reference card (assuming it's still the same cards 1+ years later). But since they are non-reference blower-style cooler, I assume they give more leeway for GPU boost 2.0 to increase clock speeds. So my assumption is that they are boosting much higher than the 970's boost clock of 1178 while the reference 980 Ti is much closer to its boost clock of 1075. So maybe the 970s are actually running much closer to their max OC than the 980 Ti?

I'm asking because I was thinking of switching to a 980 Ti from SLI 970 but your result shows a very significant advantage for the SLI 970. While I was ready to give up some performance for single-card convenience, I certainly didn't think the difference would be that big, but if you told me that your 970s are around 1300 while the 980 Ti is around 1100 it would explain everything. And your reviews are basically the only place I can get this kind of info from, few sites have 970 SLI vs 980 Ti scores.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2005
Messages
8,253 (1.19/day)
System Name money pit..
Processor Intel 9900K 4.8 at 1.152 core voltage minus 0.120 offset
Motherboard Asus rog Strix Z370-F Gaming
Cooling Dark Rock TF air cooler.. Stock vga air coolers with case side fans to help cooling..
Memory 32 gb corsair vengeance 3200
Video Card(s) Palit Gaming Pro OC 2080TI
Storage 150 nvme boot drive partition.. 1T Sandisk sata.. 1T Transend sata.. 1T 970 evo nvme m 2..
Display(s) 27" Asus PG279Q ROG Swift 165Hrz Nvidia G-Sync, IPS.. 2560x1440..
Case Gigabyte mid-tower.. cheap and nothing special..
Audio Device(s) onboard sounds with stereo amp..
Power Supply EVGA 850 watt..
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech K270
Software Win 10 pro..
Benchmark Scores Firestike 29500.. timepsy 14000..
Hey W1zzard if you do not mind, can you please answer a question I had while reading this review? I was wondering, is the 970 SLI really that much better than reference 980 Ti, and basically equal to this highly factory overclocked 980 Ti? Since the reference 970 is so rare, I see here that you are using some non-reference 970s that you set at stock to simulate a reference card (assuming it's still the same cards 1+ years later). But since they are non-reference blower-style cooler, I assume they give more leeway for GPU boost 2.0 to increase clock speeds. So my assumption is that they are boosting much higher than the 970's boost clock of 1178 while the reference 980 Ti is much closer to its boost clock of 1075. So maybe the 970s are actually running much closer to their max OC than the 980 Ti?

I'm asking because I was thinking of switching to a 980 Ti from SLI 970 but your result shows a very significant advantage for the SLI 970. While I was ready to give up some performance for single-card convenience, I certainly didn't think the difference would be that big, but if you told me that your 970s are around 1300 while the 980 Ti is around 1100 it would explain everything. And your reviews are basically the only place I can get this kind of info from, few sites have 970 SLI vs 980 Ti scores.

i moved from a pair of evga sc 970 cards to a pair of palit jetstream 980 ti cards.. the 970 cards in sli out perform a single 980 ti by maybe 10 or 15 percent..

but the 980 ti has more memory and dosnt need good game sli optimization.. at anything less than 4 K both options are more than adequate..

my air cooled super jetstreams run around 65 C with a more aggressive fan profile.. at stock they are set up more for silent running than maximum cooling.. you take your pick between a little more noise or a little more cooling..

i think in most cases AIO water cooling is more a fashion fad than a necessity.. i didnt consider a single 980 ti card an upgrade which is why i bought two of the bloody things.. in the real world its hard to tell the difference between 970 sli and a single 980 TI without running benchmarks.. but for real 4 K gaming which i dont think is here for real yet a pair of 980 ti cards are needed..

unless you are thinking about adding a second 980 ti card later on there really is no point in ditching your 970 cards for a single 980 ti.. absolutely none..

i run 1084 at 144 hrz.. my second 980 ti card is (mostly) switched off.. its there if i need it but as yet i dont need it.. :)

having spare performance in hand gives me a nice comfy feeling.. he he..

trog
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.57/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
9 (0.00/day)
System Name N/A
Processor i7-6700K @4.8GHz
Motherboard Asus ROG Maximus VIII Gene
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB 3000MHz CL15 DDR4
Video Card(s) Water-cooled EVGA GTX 980's in SLI
Storage Intel 750 SSD 400GB + Samsung 850 Pro 1TB
Display(s) LG 34UC87C 34in Curved UltraWide IPS
Case Parvum Systems S2.0
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar Essence STX II
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G2 850W
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10
Would be quite interested in this, but I already have my 980's so I won't bother.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
53 (0.01/day)
Location
L2 Cache
System Name ANTARES V6
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
Motherboard ASUS ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI
Cooling Alphacool Core 1 Aurora, Noctua NF-A12x25, Alphacool Distro D5, Alphacool HPE 480 mm
Memory Patriot Viper Elite 5 DDR5-6200 64 GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX NITRO+
Storage Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus 4 TB + Sabrent Rocket Q 8 TB
Display(s) LG 27UK650 x2
Case Corsair Obsidian 1000D
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i Titanium
Mouse Razer Deathadder V3 Pro
Keyboard Endorfy Thock
Hey W1zz! I was wondering: why there's no R9 Nano in the charts? I was curious to see the performance increases driver after driver of that tiny card, now that it got its price sliced...
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
484 (0.13/day)
Location
Fort Sill, OK
Processor Intel 7700K 5.1Ghz (Intel advised me not to OC this CPU)
Motherboard Asus Maximus IX Code
Cooling Corsair Hydro H115i Platinum
Memory 48GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4 3200 Dual Channel (2x16 & 2x8)
Video Card(s) nVIDIA Titan XP (Overclocks like a champ but stock performance is enough)
Storage Intel 760p 2280 2TB
Display(s) MSI Optix MPG27CQ Black 27" 1ms 144hz
Case Thermaltake View 71
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 1000 Platinum2
Mouse Corsair M65 Pro (not recommded, I am on my second mouse with same defect)
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 1803
Benchmark Scores Yes I am Intel fanboy that is my benchmark score.
Question when the Author said "An interesting side effect of watercooling is that power efficiency has gone way up. Because the GPU never reaches temperatures above 50°C, it will run at much better efficiency".

Does this mean this GPU requires and will run at lower voltage/lower TDP for same Clock then compare to cards using on Air cooled heatsink?

I am trying to decide if this is worth it over air cooled version aka GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 980Ti 6GB XTREME GAMING OC EDITION.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...&cm_re=gigabyte_980_ti-_-14-125-837-_-Product
 
Top