evil bill
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
- Messages
- 369 (0.05/day)
- Location
- Scotland
System Name | Main Rig | Second Rig |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo Wolfdale E8200 @ 3.2Ghz | Pentium 4 530J 3.0Ghz |
Motherboard | ASUS P5KC @ 1,600Mhz FSB | Asus P5P800 |
Cooling | Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro | Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro |
Memory | OCZ 4GB DDR2-800 (2x2GB) 5-4-4-15 | Corsair 1GB XMS DDR-400 (2 x 512MB) |
Video Card(s) | MSI NX8800GT 512MB Pre-OCd @ 660/950 | Powercolor X850 Pro 256MB AGP |
Storage | 500GB WD Caviar SATA300 | Hitachi Deckstar 80GB SATA |
Display(s) | LG 22" W2252TQ |
Case | Antec 900 | ATX Window case |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard High Definition Audio | Soundblaster Audigy SE |
Power Supply | Hiper 730W HPU-5M730-SE | Tagan 480W |
Software | Vista 64-bit SP1 | Windows 7 32-bit RC1 |
is the X1800GTO in the right place if its being done in performance order?
I can see how with a 12 pipe R520 it might be perform amongst the 16 pipe X800XTs, but I don't understand how the X1300 and X1600s are further down the list and deemed "better".
I wondered if there was a "generational gap" between the X8xx and X1xxx series but then it woudl be amongst the other R520s?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31c0d/31c0d99ea3777c2fb2bd40623e951662c181b817" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
I can see how with a 12 pipe R520 it might be perform amongst the 16 pipe X800XTs, but I don't understand how the X1300 and X1600s are further down the list and deemed "better".
I wondered if there was a "generational gap" between the X8xx and X1xxx series but then it woudl be amongst the other R520s?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31c0d/31c0d99ea3777c2fb2bd40623e951662c181b817" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"