- Joined
- May 14, 2004
- Messages
- 27,965 (3.71/day)
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
It does, but the card is running into its power limiter nearly all the time, so it's hard to isolate the measurement. Also the changed FPS rate drastically alters the power consumption from the rest of the GPU.Have you ever done any internal testing on whether Ray-tracing and/or DLSS affects the power consumption of the video card? Since there is a lot of dedicated silicon (moreso in Nvidia cards than AMD cards), I'm curious if these features add any more power when utilized, or if balances out with bottlenecks elsewhere in the GPU.
my charting engine (I wrote it, because nothing good exists out there) doesn't support slimmer bars, and not sure if worth it, how would these be sorted?slimmer bars
any suggestions how?check that they arent causing a performance degradation due to ECC
thought about this, decided against it, because the DR gains make no sense considering the investment. you're almost never CPU limited enough for the memory speed to make enough of a difference. Look for GPU limited results at Techspot. No game benefits from 32 GB, except for horrible flight simulator, and noobs will end up overspending because my reviews use 32 GB16GBx2
Our charts are simple image files that everybody can link to, and does. This greatly outweights the benefits dynamic charts offer, it's purely a business decision.I wish you guys add compare tools
There should be no significant difference because both are properly GPU limited now2. Sorry for the world of hurt, but I'd love to see Energy Efficiency for 1080p as well because absolute most gamers still game at this resolution, so it does matter.
@mechtech @TheoneandonlyMrK @BSim500: Alright, I'll add RX 580 and GTX 1060 6 GB