• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

i7 13700Hx or Ryzen 7840HS?

Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,473 (1.77/day)
Can you elaborate on this please, what sort of tasks do you think the 7840HS would edge the 13700HX on
AVX 512 ~ anything's that makes heavy use of it for instance or something like 7zip as well. Basically where 8 traditional (big) cores would be useful.

Also since it's a laptop the i7 would probably throttle earlier from its peak & harder than Ryzen. That also depends on the cooling as well as power limit set on the laptops, but each Ryzen core should generally have more power to use.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
3,243 (1.07/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Trio
Storage Too much
Display(s) Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w
Mouse G305
Keyboard Wooting HE60
VR HMD Valve Index
Software Win 10
No? Like I said, speculation isn't useful. The specific laptop is either reviewed or it isn't.

You cannot expect every laptop to be reviewed, much less every variant of every laptop. The entire reason Notebookcheck gives you those ranges is to provide further insight on expected performance of a given part based on multiple data points. Short of actually having two reviews of the same laptop but with a different CPU (which many review outlets won't do because it's a waste of time to review multiple variants of the same laptop) the information provided by notebookcheck is the next best thing.

At just a glance the reviewed Phoenix platforms w/ dGPU is also in that ballpark, around 15W for G14 2023, LOQ, and Legion Slim.

Not according to notebookcheck:

1692547712413.png


9.58w with a DGPU.

15W is the worst result for the 7840HS, which is almost as good as the 13700HX's best result. It just goes to show you.

Interesting... Gaming laptops Batteries should be easily removable to prevent this
This will affect the 7840HS to tho

They should be but companies want to force customers to upgrade more often. Yes this will impact the 7840HS but to a lesser degree due to the lower heat output.

What i care the most is that heat doesn't impact performance to the point it performs below 7840HS

Unfortunately it's hard to quantify the exact impact heat has unless we have a review of the specific model. I gave you the potential performance range in a prior post but we'd need something like a frequency vs CPU temp chart to see the impact thermals have on CPU performance.

Interesting, I just wish they were cheaper to make them more compelling, Intel is either undercutting AMD or AMD is being very stupid with their pricing strategy
From my perspective im looking at a same laptop model with both CPUs, same price
Intel offers slightly better single core performance in a variety benchmarks i seen and has extra E cores, plus Thunderbolt 4 ports

Considering this, the AMD config should be cheaper but its not therefor its hard to chose it and forego the extra performance, e cores and io

It's likely a combination of AMD overcharging and Intel undercutting. AMD wants to be the premium brand like Intel was so they are keeping prices high.

Gaming laptops push the physics, if you want any decent performance gaming* you'll want to be plugged in

That's not always the case, especially with AMD bringing 3D cache CPUs to mobile in the form of the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. If it's anything like the desktop parts, you are talking best in class performance at a fraction of the power consumption. The 7945HX3D is a 16 P-Core part with only a TDP of 40w.
 

tabascosauz

Moderator
Supporter
Staff member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
8,108 (2.37/day)
Location
Western Canada
System Name ab┃ob
Processor 7800X3D┃5800X3D
Motherboard B650E PG-ITX┃X570 Impact
Cooling NH-U12A + T30┃AXP120-x67
Memory 64GB 6400CL32┃32GB 3600CL14
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Ti Eagle┃RTX A2000
Storage 8TB of SSDs┃1TB SN550
Case Caselabs S3┃Lazer3D HT5
You cannot expect every laptop to be reviewed, much less every variant of every laptop. The entire reason Notebookcheck gives you those ranges is to provide further insight on expected performance of a given part based on multiple data points. Short of actually having two reviews of the same laptop but with a different CPU (which many review outlets won't do because it's a waste of time to review multiple variants of the same laptop) the information provided by notebookcheck is the next best thing.



Not according to notebookcheck:

View attachment 309965

9.58w with a DGPU.

15W is the worst result for the 7840HS, which is almost as good as the 13700HX's best result. It just goes to show you.

They should be but companies want to force customers to upgrade more often. Yes this will impact the 7840HS but to a lesser degree due to the lower heat output.

Unfortunately it's hard to quantify the exact impact heat has unless we have a review of the specific model. I gave you the potential performance range in a prior post but we'd need something like a frequency vs CPU temp chart to see the impact thermals have on CPU performance.

It's likely a combination of AMD overcharging and Intel undercutting. AMD wants to be the premium brand like Intel was so they are keeping prices high.

That's not always the case, especially with AMD bringing 3D cache CPUs to mobile in the form of the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. If it's anything like the desktop parts, you are talking best in class performance at a fraction of the power consumption. The 7945HX3D is a 16 P-Core part with only a TDP of 40w.

Did you even read any of the reviews? Not sure why you sorted by Min value, average idle figures as I stated.
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (7.97/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
Cheers, i'm not an expert on the laptop parts - just that it was an example of a laptop that ran cool and power efficient

You cannot expect every laptop to be reviewed, much less every variant of every laptop.
This.

It sucks but it's undeniable - there are too many variants that are limited production, it's impossible.
 
Top