- Joined
- Aug 30, 2015
- Messages
- 166 (0.05/day)
- Location
- Copenhagen, Denmark
System Name | Royal Fortune (Main)/Adventure Galley (NAS)/Little Ranger (HTPC) |
---|---|
Processor | Intel i5 4460/AMD C-70/Intel Pentium G3258 Anniversary Ed. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte ga-z97x-gaming 5/Asrock C-70M1/Asrock Z97 Anniversary |
Cooling | Phanteks PH-TC12DX/Stock/Raijintek Triton Core |
Memory | 8GB Team Group Dark 1600 CL9/8GB Team Group Elite 1600 CL9/8GB Avexir Core 1600 |
Video Card(s) | VTX3D R9 280X 3GB/APU/Palit GTX 750 TI StormX Duo |
Storage | 120GB Team Group Ultra L5 SSD + 1TB WD Black/4 X 2TB WD Blue/120 GB Kingston V300 |
Display(s) | Dell 2310/AOC e2070Swn 19.5"/TV |
Case | In Win 707/Bitfenix Prodigy M/Dimastech Easy V3 |
Audio Device(s) | N/A |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova GS 650W/be quiet! System Power 7 350W/Xigmatek Maverick 400W |
Mouse | Logitech G303 Daedalus Apex/Razer Abyssus/- |
Keyboard | Corsair K70 Red/Steelseries Apex Raw/Logitech K400 |
Software | Win10/FreeNAS 9.3/KodiBuntu |
My point exactly, except that on the CPU side the Intel sales preachers are trying to sell what they *should* have, not what they *might* have.Gosh, that sounds like AMD vs Intel since forever? Except the past ten years it was AMD selling what they didn't have, and Intel improving it as they went.
And ironically AMD is trying the 'Intel way' with their GPUs since the last five years, too.
Look at the difference in available cash and you might see why Intel sounds a little desperate.