• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i9-12900K Alder Lake Tested at Power Limits between 50 W and 241 W

Joined
Nov 18, 2020
Messages
39 (0.03/day)
Location
Arad, Romania
Processor i9-10850K @ 125W Power Limit
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming Z590-PLUS
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Kingston KF432C16RBK2/64
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 3070 TUF GAMING O8G @ 950mV / 2010MHz
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB + Kingston KC3000 2TB + Samsung 860 EVO 2TB + Samsung 870 EVO 4TB
Display(s) ASUS PB287Q + DELL S2719DGF
Case FRACTAL Define 7 Dark TG
Audio Device(s) integrated + Microlab FC330 / Audio-Technica ATH-M50s/LE
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TX-650, 80+ Titanium, 650W
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 600
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB TKL – CHERRY MX SPEED
1639042935259.png
1639043008417.png

1639043660453.png


1639043711715.png



Great review, but these graphs seem to contradict the values from the 1080p page of the game tests, where the average values are much less divergent.
 
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,763 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I was going to limit my 12600k (when I'll be able to get the mobo), this shows you can shave off the last 50W with basically no impact whatsoever. I'm going to look into setting PL1 even lower than 190W. Despite the first page saying for AL PL1=PL2 and tau=infinite, there's clearly a difference when running PL1 != PL2.
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
By the way: on Rocket Lake strange throttling behavior can occur if PL1=PL2, and both are set to a low level which would make frequency decrease below the base clock. At least this is what I observed on my i9-11900 (non-k).

I thought it might be worth demonstrating this behavior during a Blender 3D render; it could potentially be affecting this i9-12900K TDP review to some extent. After revisiting it, perhaps it is not strictly related to the base clock like I initially wrote, but it needs more testing to make sure. It does seem to occur mainly at low power limit settings.

PL1=PL2=65W, Tau=1s, reported package power = 65W. See how unstable core clocks are, varying randomly between base clock (2.5 GHz in my case) and some higher clock:

65w_pl1-eq-pl2.jpg

PL1=65W, PL2=85W, Tau=1s, reported package power = 65W. Core clocks are now stable. PC power consumption at the wall is also a few watts lower (not shown here):

65w_pl1-lt-pl2.jpg
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,763 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I thought it might be worth demonstrating this behavior during a Blender 3D render; it could potentially be affecting this i9-12900K TDP review to some extent. After revisiting it, perhaps it is not strictly related to the base clock like I initially wrote, but it needs more testing to make sure. It does seem to occur mainly at low power limit settings.

PL1=PL2=65W, Tau=1s, reported package power = 65W. See how unstable core clocks are, varying randomly between base clock (2.5 GHz in my case) and some higher clock:

View attachment 228213

PL1=65W, PL2=85W, Tau=1s, reported package power = 65W. Core clocks are now stable. PC power consumption at the wall is also a few watts lower (not shown here):

View attachment 228214
Interesting, can you test the first scenario after enabling clamp for PL1, too? I suspect that despite clamp being enabled for PL2, the PL1 setting somehow overrides that.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,508 (0.79/day)
Intel made it clear several times that this is the way the product is intended to be used.

Intel has chosen to kind of market it as a performance leading chip at all costs TDP be damned. I do think AusWolf makes a alright point though TPU has covered Alder Lake in quite a bit of depth. It seems like every time I turn around there is another article on it covering it further.

I feel what comes next with big LITTLE will be great based on how Alder Lake has turned out. I believe it will mature like fine wine much the way Ryzen has evolved over time. I don't see CPU innovation and competition slowing in a hurry. It seems like the next 5 years or beyond we'll see plenty of strong CPU competition.

I thought it might be worth demonstrating this behavior during a Blender 3D render; it could potentially be affecting this i9-12900K TDP review to some extent. After revisiting it, perhaps it is not strictly related to the base clock like I initially wrote, but it needs more testing to make sure. It does seem to occur mainly at low power limit settings.

PL1=PL2=65W, Tau=1s, reported package power = 65W. See how unstable core clocks are, varying randomly between base clock (2.5 GHz in my case) and some higher clock:

View attachment 228213

PL1=65W, PL2=85W, Tau=1s, reported package power = 65W. Core clocks are now stable. PC power consumption at the wall is also a few watts lower (not shown here):

View attachment 228214

The CPU utilization on the top looks very reminiscent of the way baud rate. One encouraging thing about that is it looks like speed step is pretty quick, but yeah that utilization is just all over the place. You might try tinkering with speed shift bumping up the minimum in throttlestop and see what happens. That might make it more consistent. Try setting the minimum to 44 with 52 max on speed shift and re-test just to see what happens in terms of utilization.
1639046084129.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
Interesting, can you test the first scenario after enabling clamp for PL1, too? I suspect that despite clamp being enabled for PL2, the PL1 setting somehow overrides that.
Unexpectedly, similar behavior. Depending on load conditions, clocks may spontaneously stabilize afterwards, but by setting first PL1=PL2=low and only then starting a high-load multithreaded benchmark, clocks can reliably be made unstable for prolonged periods of time.

65w_pl1-lt-pl2-clamp.jpg
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,753 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
@W1zzard, any plans to do head-to-head comparisons with Zen3? P-cores only at 88W/141W to match 5800X?
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
The CPU utilization on the top looks very reminiscent of the way baud rate. One encouraging thing about that is it looks like speed step is pretty quick, but yeah that utilization is just all over the place.

I think the behavior with PL1=PL2 might be undefined, and the CPU's power throttling algorithms might have some internal processing delay that can cause core clocks to be unstable at low power limits, when set that way.

To be sure that the low-power results in this review are correct, it would be probably best to check if the same occurs also on Alder Lake, but I think the best way to mitigate the issue is setting PL2 to a slightly higher level than PL1 and setting Tau to a very short time (EDIT: for example 1 second or something less. If it's much shorter than this, similar problems start occurring again).

You might try tinkering with speed shift bumping up the minimum in throttlestop and see what happens. That might make it more consistent. Try setting the minimum to 44 with 52 max on speed shift and re-test just to see what happens in terms of utilization.

No change, it seems.

65w_pl1-lt-pl2-clamp-speedshift-nochange.jpg
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.21/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Awesome test, thank you! :respect:

It shows exactly my point when I straight away dismiss claims saying "Intel is inefficient and runs hot". With custom PL settings, it's as efficient as the user wants it do be. Dropping PL values to reasonable levels gives the user a barely noticeable difference in observable performance, but a huge gain in efficiency and heat output. Reading reviewers that only test at Stock out power limits gives a one-sided and unrealistic picture.
Fixed that for you.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,508 (0.79/day)
I think the behavior with PL1=PL2 might be undefined, and the CPU's power throttling algorithms might have some internal processing delay that can cause core clocks to be unstable at low power limits, when set that way.

To be sure that the low-power results in this review are correct, it would be probably best to check if the same occurs also on Alder Lake, but I think the best way to mitigate the issue is setting PL2 to a slightly higher level than PL1 and setting Tau to a very short time (EDIT: for example 1 second or something less. If it's much shorter than this, similar problems start occurring again).



No change, it seems.

View attachment 228229
Looked more stable in the first screenshot. What about if you turn off speed shift? Strange scenario I'll give you that if only it sounded as sexy as it looks like a EDM music LFO automation. Is this a big issue with Rocket Lake or can you just bump up PL2 to like 66W or something and it works fine and just a strange bug you encountered!?

So this PL1/PL2 situation with Alder Lake this raises a good question in regard to Intel do you think they'll add a few more stage of PL settings beyond the two in the near future!? I feel like they could double them with a PL1 and PL2 for both E core and P core designs to control and dial in base and boost TDP's on each core type.

Do these power limits have any impact on the IMC!!?? Like can you limit them and get better IMC performance/stability perhaps by throttling the CPU a bit intentionally!? I can't help wonder can they help any with either pushing Gear 1 performance higher or better memory stability and frequency support perhaps out of populating all four DIMM slots for example. It's sort of a shot in the dark I suppose, but wouldn't hurt to try. Explore all possibilities I believe is the saying.

On another note and one that could have a impact on high TDP CPU's I've been considering and pondering a kind of a innovative take on cooling which I haven't seen tested and explored. It may work and prove useful and be good in practice on some of these newer more densely packed harder to cool CPU's at the same time. I spoke briefly about it once earlier in a thread, but I don't know if anyone actually saw or read about it.

So my thoughts were what if you paired a Noctua NH-D15 heatsink tower cooler and in between where the heatpipes connect to a flat base what if you adhere and mounted a water cooler block to it!!? Then run it to a radiator up to!? Any thoughts on how it might impact temperature do you think it would transfer heat well enough to the water block mounted on it and could then transfer that to the radiator!!? Now say it can you could go further with have it run from one pump to another Noctua NH-D15 mounted somewhere else so two water pump blocks and two Noctua NH-D15 heatpipe tower coolers in place of a radiator essentially.

You could even include radiators though to be fair as well actually if utilizing two or more water block pumps w/o really slowing down the water flow if you manage the line lengths in smart way it might even increase the water flow. It comes down to how far the line lengths are essentially. In the case of skipping the radiators entirely it would be pump to pump and be like two network adapters with teaming in terms of the water flow increasing the pumping power between two Noctua NH-D15 cooler's one directly mounted to the CPU the other mounted wherever you feel like CD-Rom bay perhaps?

So anyway thought I'd share that hypothetical cooling idea. I haven't seen anyone do it or consider such a approach off hand so I'm really curious. What's really interesting about it is it could be nice and silent. It could be dead silent in fact outside of pump noise or put your fans on the heatpipe tower's and basically double down with a bit of water cooling heat exchange transferring between them in sort of a NIC teaming inspired manner of speaking.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
@InVasMani : SpeedShift was not enabled when first I observed and reported this strange behavior. It is not a big issue in practice, since in most cases, including low-power devices, PL2 will be typically set to a higher level than PL1 (even if just for a few seconds or less) and if PL2 is larger than PL1 the bug does not show up.

It is only an issue if you want to limit power to a specific level for benchmarking purposes; then, you have to make sure that with PL1=PL2 the CPU is operating correctly, otherwise performance and system power consumption might not be consistent with the reported package power.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,492 (2.46/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
It's interesting seeing the efficiency chart show a sweet spot of 75-100w. Surprised to see 50w rated worse.
At 50W, the processors seems really pushed out of its comfort zone - I mean, the range in which it can adapt efficiently to the limits imposed.

Given how hairy the frametime graphs become at 50W, I'd even suspect that some throttling occurs, not for thermal reasons but to save power.

Edit: Seeing @Solid State Brain 's measurements, I'd rather say "even more throttling" than "some throttling".
 
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,763 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,439 (6.03/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Great articles, I'm still surprised mostly at how 'all over the place' Alder Lake's performance really is.

Chart top and bottom all in one product, in any combination of metrics. It also shows how unnecessary it is, in the same way. You could get all this performance already for quite some time, and where it does offer more, you probably never needed it.

Intel should have marketed this with 125W peak, really, and not PL1=PL2 just to win synthetics.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,763 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Great articles, I'm still surprised mostly at how 'all over the place' Alder Lake's performance really is.

Chart top and bottom all in one product, in any combination of metrics. It also shows how unnecessary it is, in the same way. You could get all this performance already for quite some time, and where it does offer more, you probably never needed it.

Intel should have marketed this with 125W peak, really, and not PL1=PL2 just to win synthetics.
I agree with most of that, but AL is not unnecessary. Sure you could get that performance already, but now you can get it for cheaper (i.e. 12600k is a cheaper 5800X). As lesser models (and chipsets) hit the market, this will become more apparent.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,931 (0.74/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Core i7-12700k
Motherboard Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s) RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming
Storage Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s) InnoCN 27M2V
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
This reminds me so much of what AMD did with the 5800x - gave it a PPT of 142W, and let it burn at 90C to win cinebench runs.
Cap it to ~120W and suddenly you're 30C lower for 1-2% less performance


125W seems to be the best middle ground to me as well, maybe 150W (which was not tested) would give the best of everything (And in that case, using very similar wattages to the high end ryzens eliminating the complaints about higher cooling needs)
You basically described the 5800 non-X for OEMs. That chip is one of the most efficient Desktop CPUs out there.
@W1zzard, any plans to do head-to-head comparisons with Zen3? P-cores only at 88W/141W to match 5800X?
AMD pretty much did just that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
259 (0.08/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 11700
Motherboard Asus b560-i ROG
Cooling Thermalright Assassin King Mini
Memory G.Skill Trident Z 3600
Video Card(s) RTX 3080 FE
Display(s) Dell S2721DGF
Case Ncase M1
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse HyperX
Keyboard HyperX
Awesome test, thank you! :respect:

It shows exactly my point when I straight away dismiss claims saying "Intel is inefficient and runs hot". With custom PL settings, it's as efficient as the user wants it do be. Dropping PL values to reasonable levels gives the user a barely noticeable difference in observable performance, but a huge gain in efficiency and heat output. Reading reviewers that only test at maxed out power limits gives a one-sided and unrealistic picture.
My friend, exactly the same case here with majority of noobs or fanboys simply not understanding how PL1 and PL2 work and what those 240w meant for last 3-4 gens or so. They completely don’t realize how much efficiency can be gained from setting your limit based on what you use it and how little k processors offer for home usage.

I personally run my 11700 with 125/140 limits in itx Ncase on air (silver soul 135) with temps not going beyond mid 60s in cpu-tense games and simply laugh at all “inefficiency” talks amd fanboys are so keen on.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,439 (6.03/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
I agree with most of that, but AL is not unnecessary. Sure you could get that performance already, but now you can get it for cheaper (i.e. 12600k is a cheaper 5800X). As lesser models (and chipsets) hit the market, this will become more apparent.

Certainly, but I was mostly referring to how Alder Lake tries to muddy the waters with its PL1=PL2 nonsense, it has absolutely no practical advantage.

Competition wise, this is great.
 

Xebec

New Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2021
Messages
17 (0.02/day)
Excellent article - I've been following TPU for years and years and finally decided to register :) I really can't say enough about how much I love this website's data and testing methodologies - it's an extremely helpful reference.

One question - will there be a follow-up discussing temps or anything like that for the various wattages run? Temperature can affect the power used independently of the fact that power itself generates heat. I'm just curious academically.

An old 3770K, for example - can increase power usage by 20W just by running hotter - same voltage (1.359V), same clock speed (3.2 GHz), and same application test - the difference being 60C vs 100C operating temperatures. This sort of implies even more scaling losses as you go higher in overall power usage. Interestingly, at a much lower voltage - 0.923V for example, power seemed to only increase ~ 12-15W when the CPU went from ~ 40C to 100C (a wider band too).

Sources:
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
541 (0.08/day)
System Name Ed-PC
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus TUF Z690 PLUS Wifi D4
Cooling Noctua NH-14S
Memory Crucial Ballistix DDR4 C16@3600 16GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia MSI 970
Storage Samsung 980, 860evo
Case Lian Li Lancool II mesh Perf
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
Software Win10 Pro 64bit
W1zzard: on the Wprime 1024M tests are you running the test with all threads enabled?
Cause my 12600k with a 16 thread count setting scores 79.911 sec

When I start Wprime 2.10 it defaults to 4 thread count.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,703 (0.55/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
Any chance of doing the same type of efficiency test with Ryzen 5900X or 5950X? That is even easier. Just needs changing the power limit from auto (142W) to 105W, and another step (75W maybe?) or 2 down to tis lower limit @45W.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,763 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Certainly, but I was mostly referring to how Alder Lake tries to muddy the waters with its PL1=PL2 nonsense, it has absolutely no practical advantage.

Competition wise, this is great.
I concur to a degree, but honestly, mortals don't know what PL1 and PL2 are.
The only practical effect is these will run as hot as the cooler allows (reviews use high-end cooling, end users do not, typically) and thus rather loud. If Intel doesn't dial PL back in locked chips, these will end up next to Netburst in history.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
The issue I have with the default PL2 setting used until Rocket Lake, when it's intended to be much higher than PL1, is that the default Tau of 52 seconds (or even 28 seconds on lower SKUs) does not make much sense if the aim is just taking advantage of the thermal inertia of the cooler. After so many seconds at high power, temperature can easily increase close to the thermal limit, and fans will easily respond to that. For this mode of operation to make sense as claimed, PL2 would have to last just a few seconds.

A different way of using different PL1/PL2 advantageously is disregarding thermal inertia and setting PL2 to a high level so that short-term intense multithreaded loads can take place at full speed. Then, PL1 can be set to a low level after a Tau time of several minutes for more efficient operation for long jobs (3D/video rendering, etc).

Default settings resemble more the second scenario, but then a 28s/56s Tau feels short for that.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
575 (0.21/day)
Just setting PL2 in the BIOS doesn’t help much since the CPU and motherboard will still use high voltages for no reason. Best method is setting PL2 at 241w and reducing the voltage via V/F and you’ll get same performance at around 170w CPU package in Cinebench. 27k multi points at 170w is efficient as hell.
 
Top