Intel Core Ultra 7 1002H Spotted on Geekbench, Meteor Lake Sample Hits 5.0 GHz Max. Clock

[T0@st]

Pre-release Meteor Lake silicon has popped up again thanks to an Intel Corporation Client Platform getting submitted for evaluation through Geekbench 6.1.0. The latest database entry—discovered by Benchleaks—presents yet another Core Ultra 100H mobile CPU series engineering sample. This new candidate could end up being named "Core Ultra 165H" once it hits retail in finalized form. Team Blue seems to be playing around with its naming/identifying schemes ahead of an official unveiling—we hope to see something sensible presented at this month's Innovation event.

The tested Meteor Lake Client Platform featured a Core Ultra 7 1002H CPU mounted on an MTL-P LP5x T4 RVP board, with access to 12 GB of memory. Clock speeds of 3.4 GHz (base) and 4.988 GHz are mentioned on the Geekbench Browser page. A 6 P-Core and 10 E-Core configuration aligns this evaluated sample with the previously leaked Core Ultra 7 165H SKU. It achieved a single-core score of 2439 points in Geekbench 6.1, placing it above previously submitted Meteor Lake samples. The multi-core tally comes in at 12668, which trails slightly behind other compiled scores.




Here is a VideoCardz-authored performance chart + compilation of leaked Meteor Lake mobile processors on Geekbench:



They note that: "For reference, we added Core Ultra 7 1002H to the lineup, although it is most certainly not going to be a retail SKU. Should Core Ultra 7 165H be indeed based on this pre-production sample, one should also expect 3.4 GHz base clock, a bit lower than 155H of 3.8 GHz."

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source

 

[theouto]

What the hell is that name?

 

[wNotyarD]

What the hell is that name?

Intel is killing the Core i# branding, replacing it with Core Ultra #. And just as you reacted, the vast majority here thinks it is a very bad joke.

 

[usiname]

Intel is killing the Core i# branding, replacing it with Core Ultra #. And just as you reacted, the vast majority here thinks it is a very bad joke.

Leave the "Core i" or "Ultra", the big problem are the numbers - full mess
Regardless the score - less than 13700h in single and multi despite the new node, architecture and the 2 extra cores. Thankfully for Intel, geektrash is the worst score generator that does not deserve to be called benchmark

 

[Denver]

This thing has 16 cores and still manages to score below the Ryzen 7600? lol

 

[kondamin]

it's nice it goes up to 5Ghz.

 

[P4-630]

it's nice it goes up to 5Ghz.

Who knows what laptop manufacturers do to it, to keep it below a certain TDP...

 

[Nanochip]

I guess we’ll see if Meteor Lake implements Thunderbolt 5 or if we will have to wait on a new Lake for TB5.

 

[thesmokingman]

Leave the "Core i" or "Ultra", the big problem are the numbers - full mess
Regardless the score - less than 13700h in single and multi despite the new node, architecture and the 2 extra cores. Thankfully for Intel, geektrash is the worst score generator that does not deserve to be called benchmark

But its the trash bench of choice for Intel?

 

[R0H1T]

Intel trying to outdo AMD & USB IF in who's the king of numbskull pyramid naming schemes!

 

[usiname]

But its the trash bench of choice for Intel?

It is, because make their CPUs to look better, maybe they didn't requested yet the new update which will give 20% improvement to the meteor lake

 

[Nanochip]

Intel trying to outdo AMD & USB IF in who's the king of numbskull pyramid naming schemes!

No one can out do the USB-IF usb3 shenanigans.

 

[progste]

Intel is killing the Core i# branding, replacing it with Core Ultra #. And just as you reacted, the vast majority here thinks it is a very bad joke.

they could just make it Core u# and at least it would make more sense...

 

[wNotyarD]

they could just make it Core u# and at least it would make more sense...

No no no no no. It must be Core ULTRA PRO MAX EXTREME #.