• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Formally Announces the Core i7 and Core i9 X Series Processors

Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,520 (1.40/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Either way, IMO it's a great move for users - especially those that want to upgrade in the future.

Sorry, but I don't see at all how this is a great move for users. I mean from now you will have to start paying top dollars for a new motherboard, RAM, cooling solutions, etc. Everything will be more and more expensive.
Sorry, but this is not a great move at all. might be for Intel, but definitely not End Users.
 
Joined
May 10, 2016
Messages
14 (0.00/day)
112W seems realistic for this part. 7700K was pretty hungry already.
I agree the TIM is surprising, but we don't know anything about it. It doesn't have to be the same material they use in LGA1151.

As for anything else you've mentioned: it's fairly obvious that Intel decided to move OC-oriented CPUs from LGA1151 to LGA2066.
I won't be surprised if Kaby Lake successor (whatever it will be in the end...) has no -K CPUs at all. This would finally become a consumer platform - designed for stability and features.

The 7700k came with a HD 630 at 91W TDP, this axes the iGPU and rises the TDP. Makes no sense what so ever.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
18,968 (2.84/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2
Memory 2 x 16GB Kingston Fury 3400mhz
Video Card(s) XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + some headphones, Nektar SE61 keyboard
Power Supply Corsair RM850x v3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 1.0 TKL Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Rimworld 4K ready!
I don't understand why this is such a shock.
How much do you have to pay AMD to get >40 PCIe lanes at this point?

You can't as they have no such thing yet.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.24/day)
The 7700k came with a HD 630 at 91W TDP, this axes the iGPU and rises the TDP. Makes no sense what so ever.

AFAIK the IGP's power consumption is not included in TDP.
In most tests I've seen 7700K consumes around 90W in pure CPU tasks (and in heavy load with a dGPU).

You can't as they have no such thing yet.

Very true!
So how can @Prima.Vera evaluate whether $1000 is too high, when there's nothing to compare? :)


Sorry, but I don't see at all how this is a great move for users. I mean from now you will have to start paying top dollars for a new motherboard, RAM, cooling solutions, etc. Everything will be more and more expensive.

Because this would separate the "consumer/business" and "gaming/OC" segments.
So someone looking for feature-rich LGA1151 might not be forced to get a gaming/OC-oriented model anymore.
On the other hand, the whole gaming/OC ecosystem would be kept on a single socket (with much wider price range). So it's less likely that someone would have to upgrade from one socket to another.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
294 (0.05/day)
Location
Saigon city
System Name Kurise PC
Processor i7 5820k 4,7ghz / Ryzen 1700x 4ghz / 8700k
Motherboard Asus X99 deluxe / MSI x370 gaming pro carbon / z370i strix
Cooling EK evo, xspc slim 360 rad, D5 pump, dual alpha cool GPU mono block, dual xspc 240 radiator, DDC 18w
Memory Crucial sport white 16gb x 8 128gb 2666mhz/ Crucial sport white 16gb x 4 64gb 2933 / ddr4 chinese 32
Video Card(s) GTX 1080Ti SLI / HP gtx 1080 SLI 1850/1520 / 2080ti ref
Storage Lite on 512GB x 3 / Plextor m2 256gb / samsung 970 evo
Display(s) AOC I2769Vm, AOC U3477PQU, AOC I2769Vm / Koios 40''/ eizo EV2730QFX 1:1
Case Xigmatek Elysium / Corsair 750D / Bitfenix prodigy M
Audio Device(s) creative blaster ZX / Blaster ZXR / Blaster x7 lmt + burson v5i upgraded
Power Supply Be Quiet 1200 / Thermaltake toughpower 1200w / chinese 750w sfx PSU
Mouse Asus Echelon/ steelseries black ops II/ james donkey
Keyboard Cm storm quickfire pro / Fire rose steampunk kb/ corsair k70
Software Windows 10
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.24/day)
there is a 7800x benchmark leaked, 7800x 3,5ghz vs ryzen 1600x which the 7800x has nearly 50% performance in term of single and multi http://wccftech.com/intel-core-i7-7800x-7900x-i9-7900x-cpu-benchmarks-leaked/ .....

As expected.
If these leaks turn out to be true, we'll simply get back to normality in the Intel vs AMD race. Intel will win in performance, AMD will win in value.

At this point the latest price drops of Ryzen 7 are a lot easier to understand. They did the consumer 7 cores earlier, they had their 5 minutes.
Now it's time to drop to a realistic price.
That's what competition is all about. Thanks Intel!
 
Top