• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Ice Lake" IPC Best-Case a Massive 40% Uplift Over "Skylake," 18% on Average

Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,437 (1.43/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Having HT turned on would make a world of difference in fighting AMD. That is exactly what causes big losses for Intel CPUs in production benchmarks vs Zen.
You are missing the point. Intel doesn't want to fight back. Was never interested in fighting AMD back. Intel wants to win the battle. Diminish the opponent and show superiority just as it has been for the couple of years when Intel's products were superior to AMD's. having a processors 6c 12t or 4c 8t is not going to win the battle for Intel against AMD.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,753 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
having a processors 6c 12t or 4c 8t is not going to win the battle for Intel against AMD.
Why not? As an example, 9600K with 6c/6t is currently intended to compete with 2600x 6c/12t. If not for less threads it would be very competitive in production performance as well. There is a similar situation with Ryzen 7 and i7 and Ryzen 3 and i3.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.56/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Why not do 4c/8t, 6c/12t, 8c/16t like competition does. All this quite literally exists in the same pieces of silicon they are selling (= no additional cost).

Intel is currently not selling any 4c/8t or 6c/12t CPUs for consumer.
I dont have that answer... Respectfully WGAF though? There is the 8700k and w/e the 4/8 count derivative (8600k?) Are still for sale... just like zen+ will still be too.You act like coffelake improved on anything except clocks. Why fill that portion in and waste precious silicon when they are already limited?

All I know is that they didnt drop HT because of vulnerabilities. It's an interesting theory, but I dont buy it. Maybe Intel is the only saner one not pumping useless core and thread counts into the mainstream platform. ;)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
74 (0.02/day)
the frustrating thing is how long Intel has been sitting on the same IPC. tho, i suppose it's good they didn't swoop in with Ice Lake before Zen 2 launched, giving AMD some breathing room and some room for competition for a while
 
Top