- Joined
- Jun 14, 2020
- Messages
- 4,214 (2.49/day)
System Name | Mean machine |
---|---|
Processor | AMD 6900HS |
Memory | 2x16 GB 4800C40 |
Video Card(s) | AMD Radeon 6700S |
Depends on the workloads. For extremely heavy mt, a 7950x is more efficient than the 13900k at iso wattage but not by a lot, contrary to what people think. The difference peaks in vray at 20%,but in most workloads it averages out at 12 to 15%. It's not a small difference, but it's not a generational gap.They are efficient but the performance ceiling at which they're still efficient is not nearly as close to topping charts as they would like.
But if you actually set aside extreme multithreaded scenarios and go for mixed workloads, intel knocks it out of the park, it's not even a contest. Of course that is because of the monolithic design, but the details don't really matter to the end user. My actual daily work requires lots of browsers excel sheets and the likes, multiple tasks but not heavily threaded. Intel cpus handle that at 6 to 12w, while zen 4 need 40+. That is one huge gap right there.
Gaming is the only scenario right now that Raptorlake suffers compared to the 3d parts in terms of efficiency. It's terrible, but thankfully you can always opt for an alder lake cpu just like I did