- Joined
- Apr 6, 2021
- Messages
- 1,131 (0.82/day)
- Location
- Bavaria ⌬ Germany
System Name | ✨ Lenovo M700 [Tiny] |
---|---|
Cooling | ⚠️ 78,08% N² ⌬ 20,95% O² ⌬ 0,93% Ar ⌬ 0,04% CO² |
Audio Device(s) | ◐◑ AKG K702 ⌬ FiiO E10K Olympus 2 |
Mouse | ✌️ Corsair M65 RGB Elite [Black] ⌬ Endgame Gear MPC-890 Cordura |
Keyboard | ⌨ Turtle Beach Impact 500 |
I find the "... and above" part in the chart very funny. Leaving out half of the competitors lineup.
The chart would look very different, lol.
Really looking forward to "Real Life" performance & power consumption results.
That's what I was thinking, too. A310/A380, A580, A750/A770/A780.
x80 marks the top of each class. I assume the silicon couldn't handle A780 power requirements, power consumption was too high or the stock cooler just couldn't handle it.
Not buying Ryan Shrout's statement. As a Intel representative even less.
The chart would look very different, lol.
Really looking forward to "Real Life" performance & power consumption results.
It's hard to believe that Intel wasn't planning an A780 part, when both the lower-end A300- and A500-series have x80 parts, why wouldn't the top tier have an x80 part?
Intel does have a very messy naming structure and there's no mobile 780 part either, but I believe Intel decided to step back the customer performance expectations a smidgen by going with 770 instead of 780 with the Alchemy cards. I'm sure we'll see a B780/B880 whatever it might be called, if the performance is there.
Also, this has nothing to do with MLID, it's been suggested there was going to be an A780 part for the longest of times.
That's what I was thinking, too. A310/A380, A580, A750/A770/A780.
x80 marks the top of each class. I assume the silicon couldn't handle A780 power requirements, power consumption was too high or the stock cooler just couldn't handle it.
Not buying Ryan Shrout's statement. As a Intel representative even less.