The King is dead! Long live the King!
The King is dead! Long live the King!
The KING isn't dead YET, and that would be the Socket 775 E-8400, IMHO of course.
It may be long discontinued but it is still far from dead.
I own 3 of them and also a E-8500 and they all still kick ass and take names. I OC a couple of the @ 4.0Ghz and they are still running great after 2 years on OC, on air mind you.
Yes, and I know what's coming next...old tech, has been, only a dual core, blah...blah...blah.
Keep thinking that, I find it hilarious. In the meantime I keep buying more E-8400s and Asus mobos as I find good ones for the right price.
I also have a i5-2500K SB and I can tell you this much from running the cpus side by side.
In the real world of gaming (most games I play) there is not much difference at all. Not that I notice as dramatic or anything even close to dramatic.
In the real world of office applications, no difference.
Multitasking? Hah, not that I see.
Ok, video rendering, yes. There is a difference and it's noticable timewise.
But really, so what? Big deal. I just go grab a beer while working and do other things if I'm rendering.
Seems to me all these cpu upgrades are really just money grabbing schemes for the millions of suckers out there. Yes, I admit, I am one myself.
Unless you really need some super kind of Hyper Threading horsepower for applications like 3D Modeling or 3D Cad or you are a professional Video Editor making money from such, I think it's a waste.
I mean really? Ivy Bridge so soon coming after Sandy Bridge, which works great for 99.9% of the people I talk to?
Sandy Bridge just launched yesterday!!!
1366 dead already? WHY? This is a remarkable cpu that only a little while ago, was considered a super chip.
Has software developed by leaps and bounds to take advantage of even more of a processor? I know of many professional mechanical engineering companies that use this cpu for their software such as Solid Works including animations and renderings, and they are using the 1366 and 1155 cpus.
775 dead why?
Because they were too good and Intel needed to get you to spend more money, I think.
Heck, I even use Autocad Product Design Suite on one of my 775 machines and it works the nuts. Yes, the machine has a decent video card and 8Gb of ram but my point is the cpu doesn't struggle with complicated software such as this. Could I spend more money and get my work done a few seconds quicker...sure. Is it worth it dollar wise? Not to me.
Ok, I've ranted and I'll quit now.
But the title KING belongs to the E-8400, IMHO, more than any other cpu to date so far.
Thanks.