• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Z270 and H270 Chipsets Detailed: More PCIe Lanes

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Early 2017, a new wave of socket LGA1151 motherboards based on Intel 200-series chipset will launch, alongside the company's 7th generation Core "Kaby Lake" processors. The lineup will be led by the Z270 Express, targeting performance desktops, and H270 Express, targeting premium commercial desktops. The question on your mind probably is what sets these chipsets apart from the current 100-series Z170 and H170 chipsets. Here are some pointers.

To begin with, motherboards based on Z270 and H270 chipsets are assured to support Core "Kaby Lake" processors, out of the box. The 100-series chipset motherboards inventory with retailers may require BIOS updates, although some of the newer production batches could ship with the latest BIOS that support "Kaby Lake." Secondly, the Z270 and H270 support Intel Optane technology, a new breed of bleeding-edge performance SSDs based on the company's 3D X-point non-volatile memory, which is the very latest in sold-state storage, and purported to be the fastest. The chipets also support Rapid Storage Technology v15.



Thirdly, and this could be of more relevance to PC enthusiasts, the 200-series chipsets have more downstream (general purpose) PCI-Express gen 3.0 lanes. The chipsets have 14 downstream PCIe lanes; compared to 10 on the 100-series chipsets. The LGA1151 processor has 16 PCI-Express gen 3.0 lanes it sets aside for graphics, and four lanes that go to the chipset as physical layer of the DMI 3.0 chipset bus. This means motherboard designers can cram in additional bandwidth-heavy onboard devices such as Thunderbolt and USB 3.1 controllers; additional M.2 slots, or just more PCIe slots with greater than x1 bandwidth. This takes the platform's total PCIe lane budget to 30, compared to 26 on the 100-series chipset motherboards.

What sets the Z270 apart from the H270 are the same things that set the Z170 apart from the H170. The Z270 supports CPU overclocking and multi-GPU by splitting the PCI-Express 3.0 x16 PEG port from the CPU into two PCI-Express 3.0 x8 slots using 3-way lane switches. The H170 lacks CPU overclocking and multi-GPU support. You should still be able to use a pair of AMD Radeon graphics cards on the H270/H170 by running the second card on the PCI-Express x16 (electrical x4) slots some motherboards feature, since AMD drivers support this; although the performance won't be optimal, as the second card will become a strain on the DMI chipset bus.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
At least the new chip-set is not a complete waste. :) :)
I will only upgrade to this platform if the mobo craps, otherwise no way Jose :) :)
 
So, the only selling point they'll now have is "moar PCIe lanes". Seriously? How about not making Z170 such a turd 1 year ago?
 
Still not enough PCIe lanes to do CF or SLI at x16 PCIe 3.0 per GPU though so still not worth it
 
I just wonder if memory overclocking will be a bit better, this is usually the saving grace of one of intels underwhelming new releases

Right now on skylake 3200 seems to be the sweet spot not only on price, but also some boards and imc's struggle over this
 
Still not enough PCIe lanes to do CF or SLI at x16 PCIe 3.0 per GPU though so still not worth it

These are PCIe lanes from the chipset, not the CPU. The mainstream CPUs "only" provide 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes, a number that's unlikely to ever be increased because then mainstream would start to intrude on HEDT.

And since PCIe 3.0 x8 is more than sufficient for any GPU available today, any 2-card SLI/CF setup isn't crippled on a mainstream platform. If you want more than 2 GPUs at their full bandwidth, you gotta buy HEDT.
 
Last edited:
They are not going to give mainstream boards 2x16 pci-e when its a £180-200 optional extra on x99
 
These are PCIe lanes from the chipset, not the CPU. The mainstream CPUs "only" provide 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes, a number that's unlikely to ever be increased because then mainstream would start to intrude on HEDT.

And since PCIe 3.0 x8 is more than sufficient for any GPU available today, any 2-card SLI/CF setup on a mainstream platform. If you want more than 2 GPUs, you gotta buy HEDT.
With 6th gen Cpus Intel did increase the cpu pci-e lanes to 20. Though additional chipset pcie lanes can be useful for extra controllers or pcie ssds.
 
I think, this announcement proves intel always targets the consumers pockets.
 
I mean I'm kinda glad because it means my chipset gets more longevity.

But the other half of me is screaming something about tech stagnation and I can't shut him up...
 
Still not enough PCIe lanes to do CF or SLI at x16 PCIe 3.0 per GPU though so still not worth it
Sound legit, except for the part where it isn't?
perfrel_1920_1080.png


Pretty sure that 8 lanes at PCI-E 3.0 is enough to drive a modern GPU and that even using 4x 3.0 lanes off the PCH isn't as bad as you think it is. If you're complaining about 5%, you must be absolutely livid when games don't scale perfectly. :laugh:
 
Sound legit, except for the part where it isn't?
perfrel_1920_1080.png


Pretty sure that 8 lanes at PCI-E 3.0 is enough to drive a modern GPU and that even using 4x 3.0 lanes off the PCH isn't as bad as you think it is. If you're complaining about 5%, you must be absolutely livid when games don't scale perfectly. :laugh:
exactly! pcie lanes are a bit overrated.. on the other hand, though i don't see how this fact warrants a "new" chipset.
 
Still not enough PCIe lanes to do CF or SLI at x16 PCIe 3.0 per GPU though so still not worth it
You straight up don't need that many lanes for SLI or CrossFire. Even a Titan X is nowhere near saturating 16 PCI-e 3.0 lanes. You can easily use x8/x8 with no performance drop.
 
With 6th gen Cpus Intel did increase the cpu pci-e lanes to 20. Though additional chipset pcie lanes can be useful for extra controllers or pcie ssds.

But those 4 lanes aren't available for use. They are used as a DMI interface with the chipset. This provides more bandwidth between the chipset and the CPU.

What using those 4 CPU lanes to connect to the chipset allows is in turn more PCI-E lanes connected to the chipset, for expansion like storage, as you mentioned. With the shift to PCI-E storage, more PCI-E lanes available for this is always good. What the Z270 chipset basically allows is an additional full speed M.2 slot over Z170. That is what those extra 4 PCI-E lanes amount to.
 
coming from sandy this looks appealing, i might actually upgrade.
 
These are PCIe lanes from the chipset, not the CPU. The mainstream CPUs "only" provide 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes, a number that's unlikely to ever be increased because then mainstream would start to intrude on HEDT.

And since PCIe 3.0 x8 is more than sufficient for any GPU available today, any 2-card SLI/CF setup isn't crippled on a mainstream platform. If you want more than 2 GPUs at their full bandwidth, you gotta buy HEDT.


That's just not a good enough option when the next AMD chips are going to have 64 or 128 PCIe lanes
 
That's just not a good enough option when the next AMD chips are going to have 64 or 128 PCIe lanes

Citation?

I believe what you'll quote is referring to server segment parts.
 
That's just not a good enough option when the next AMD chips are going to have 64 or 128 PCIe lanes
That's a load of crap without a source because that's a ton of pins when the PCI-E root complex is on the CPU. The number of pins would have to increase by an easy 40% in order to do that which is a stretch to say the least. I think it's more realistic that there will be 32 lanes per CPU and that 64 might be available on a 2P server or 128 on a 4P server but, 64-128 on a consumer grade product... that's laughable to say the least.
 
I think it is a turn-point from SATA to PCIe although the new platform has 6 SATA ports. The new platform can support Optane technology and with much more PCIe lanes. So if Intel could release the Optane SSD on schedule, I think the DIMM SSD, PCIe SSD with Optane technology will have a breathtaking debut by then.
 
I intend to create a rig to mine cryptocurrency. Can I use the new Z270 to connect 6 video cards (RX 470 Nitro) so they are working at the same time? With the Z170 only 4 GPU could be connected, because with the 5 or 6 GPU the PC froze or generated some other error, hence the question. It is important to clarify that the 6 Gpu are connected by Riser 1x.

In summary, does the Z270 have enough pci lanes so that 6 GPUs are connected and working at the same time, without affecting the performance of the motherboard by the saturation of the bandwidth?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20170209-095424.jpg
    Screenshot_20170209-095424.jpg
    593.2 KB · Views: 546
There is also changes to the 14nm process. It is less transistor dense and a larger fin pitch reducing the heat which means higher base clocks.
 
So did anyone here end up buying a Threadripper? :toast:

Took them a few more generations than I was led to believe to get over 100 PCI-e lanes
 
Back
Top