- Joined
- Feb 24, 2023
- Messages
- 3,543 (4.98/day)
- Location
- Russian Wild West
System Name | D.L.S.S. (Die Lekker Spoed Situasie) |
---|---|
Processor | i5-12400F |
Motherboard | Gigabyte B760M DS3H |
Cooling | Laminar RM1 |
Memory | 32 GB DDR4-3200 |
Video Card(s) | RX 6700 XT (vandalised) |
Storage | Yes. |
Display(s) | MSi G2712 |
Case | Matrexx 55 (slightly vandalised) |
Audio Device(s) | Yes. |
Power Supply | Thermaltake 1000 W |
Mouse | Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress... |
Keyboard | Makes some noise. Probably onto something. |
VR HMD | I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one. |
Software | Windows 11 / 10 / 8 |
Benchmark Scores | My PC can run Crysis. Do I really need more than that? |
Nah, it wasn't the best for its time. As many people stated above, 1060 series GPUs were much better price per performance wise, also being much more appropriate because 1440p and especially 2160p were not a thing 7 to 8 years ago. About 9 percent gamers worldwide at resolutions higher than 1080p IIRC.
CPUs of 2016 also weren't fast enough to make use of everything 1080 Ti got. Benchmarks from back then show the difference between 1080 and 1080 Ti being much less than theoretical, even at high resolutions.
By now, it's a heavily mined out obsolete 200+ W brick which can do well in older games but still not worth it. I'd prefer paying a tad more and getting at least a semi-recent GPU like RX 6600 or RTX 3060.
CPUs of 2016 also weren't fast enough to make use of everything 1080 Ti got. Benchmarks from back then show the difference between 1080 and 1080 Ti being much less than theoretical, even at high resolutions.
By now, it's a heavily mined out obsolete 200+ W brick which can do well in older games but still not worth it. I'd prefer paying a tad more and getting at least a semi-recent GPU like RX 6600 or RTX 3060.