- Joined
- Feb 1, 2019
- Messages
- 3,666 (1.71/day)
- Location
- UK, Midlands
System Name | Main PC |
---|---|
Processor | 13700k |
Motherboard | Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02 |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S |
Memory | 32 Gig 3200CL14 |
Video Card(s) | 4080 RTX SUPER FE 16G |
Storage | 1TB 980 PRO, 2TB SN850X, 2TB DC P4600, 1TB 860 EVO, 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red |
Display(s) | LG 27GL850 |
Case | Fractal Define R4 |
Audio Device(s) | Soundblaster AE-9 |
Power Supply | Antec HCG 750 Gold |
Software | Windows 10 21H2 LTSC |
Seems its been discovered in 24H2 its now off by default. If that is incorrect then dont shoot the messenger, a youtuber put it in a video.VBS is on for Windows 11 by default.
This youtuber still not testing intel as well? He needs to do a better job, Intel needs to be in that data, and he needs to list the things he check listed to assure both Windows were either configured the same way (as there is more than just VBS) or if there is anything different listed.
Win11 24H2 version (the patched one!) still gives bad performance for Ryzen 3000 & 5000 compared to win10. So, for 3-4 years now, AMD is having much worse reviews than they should on their CPUs just because of that mess of an OS. And Intel stayed afloat as having comparable CPU performance due to nerfed Ryzen performance.
As for the question if MS does that on purpose, let me ask:
1) Which of those 3 companies (MS, Intel, AMD) have being found guilty at least once for anti-competion practices? Those two found guilty have collaborated for decades now. AMD was always the small company that happened to compete well for a few years with Athlon CPUs and went down again because of market manipulation from Intel side for years.
2) Which of the others MS would help if Intel or AMD pushed to get a help?
3) Which one between AMD and Intel needed that more and had more money to burn and buy out that help?
4) Who was so desperate to remain relevant while their products were inferior in most metrics and would remain so for the next 3 years (at least)?
That thread title is just a logical question for any sensible person with knowledge of historical facts of PC market. And most should anwer YES given the strong evidence coming out day after day. 2/3rds of the games show AMD CPUs losing close or more than 10% (huge difference) when going from win10 to win11 and only a few% of games do so for Intel.
When HUB tested Win11, as well as I think it was level1 tech, they both got improved performance on 24H2 on AMD vs Windows 10. (Hub also tested Intel and that had an improvement as well).
Seems to be a bunch of youtubers just doing random Windows build AMD only testing like they all clones jumping on the same bandwagon.
Last edited: