• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Low 4090 performance in a prebuilt, how to improve?

Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
26 (0.07/day)
Location
California
System Name Corsair Vengeance i7400 Prebuilt
Processor Intel i9-13900K
Motherboard MSI Z690-A WiFi DDR5
Cooling Corsair 240mm AIO, 3 front fans, 1 rear fan
Memory 64GB Corsair DDR5-5600
Video Card(s) ASUS 4090 TUF
Storage 2TB SSD
Display(s) BenQ 4K 32", BenQ 4K 27", Dell 4K 43", Dell 1920x1200 24"
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply Corsair 1000W 80 Plus Gold
Glad it was somthing so simple it's off by default so I didn't even think of it.

The default on mine is on, probably due to the Studio Driver I use. My work is more similar to rendering than gaming, I suppose.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,787 (3.03/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
The default on mine is on, probably due to the Studio Driver I use. My work is more similar to rendering than gaming, I suppose.

Makes sense. Glad it was a big nothingburger.

Ahhhh...

I've always been curious how much using ECC affects performance, and now I know. I learned something today. :)

Same.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
26 (0.07/day)
Location
California
System Name Corsair Vengeance i7400 Prebuilt
Processor Intel i9-13900K
Motherboard MSI Z690-A WiFi DDR5
Cooling Corsair 240mm AIO, 3 front fans, 1 rear fan
Memory 64GB Corsair DDR5-5600
Video Card(s) ASUS 4090 TUF
Storage 2TB SSD
Display(s) BenQ 4K 32", BenQ 4K 27", Dell 4K 43", Dell 1920x1200 24"
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply Corsair 1000W 80 Plus Gold
Now should I get a larger AIO for my 13900K? It has a 240mm AIO with 2 fans? The case is too short for a 360mm. But will a 280mm AIO help? Currently, I have to limit the PL1 at 230W and PL2 at 180 watts to keep it from thermal throttling.

But guess this topic belongs to another forum group. :)

Thanks all again.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 14, 2023
Messages
310 (0.70/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7900X
Motherboard MSI MPG X670E Carbon WiFi
Cooling Custom Loop (Watercool/HWLabs)
Memory G.Skill Trident Z5 DDR5-6000 64GB (F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5K)
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom GS
Storage 7 x M.2, 4 x SSD, 2 x HDD.
Display(s) Alienware AW3423DW
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z207, Shanling UA1 Plus
Power Supply Corsair HX1200
Mouse Logitech MX Master
Keyboard Logitech k360
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores None, but I think they'd be fairly decent.
What kind of CPU temps do you see?

A 280mm radiator will give you ~30% more area than a 240mm and just shy of the area of a 360mm. In other words, if you actually need an upgrade a 280 will be just about as good as a 360. And if you do change, get one with a radiator that's thicker than the typical 25mm if you can.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
26 (0.07/day)
Location
California
System Name Corsair Vengeance i7400 Prebuilt
Processor Intel i9-13900K
Motherboard MSI Z690-A WiFi DDR5
Cooling Corsair 240mm AIO, 3 front fans, 1 rear fan
Memory 64GB Corsair DDR5-5600
Video Card(s) ASUS 4090 TUF
Storage 2TB SSD
Display(s) BenQ 4K 32", BenQ 4K 27", Dell 4K 43", Dell 1920x1200 24"
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply Corsair 1000W 80 Plus Gold
What kind of CPU temps do you see?

A 280mm radiator will give you ~30% more area than a 240mm and just shy of the area of a 360mm. In other words, if you actually need an upgrade a 280 will be just about as good as a 360. And if you do change, get one with a radiator that's thicker than the typical 25mm if you can.

I get a max core temp of 88-90C. This is with setting the PL1=180watts.

1697501429820.png
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2023
Messages
310 (0.70/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7900X
Motherboard MSI MPG X670E Carbon WiFi
Cooling Custom Loop (Watercool/HWLabs)
Memory G.Skill Trident Z5 DDR5-6000 64GB (F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5K)
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom GS
Storage 7 x M.2, 4 x SSD, 2 x HDD.
Display(s) Alienware AW3423DW
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z207, Shanling UA1 Plus
Power Supply Corsair HX1200
Mouse Logitech MX Master
Keyboard Logitech k360
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores None, but I think they'd be fairly decent.
Well, it's within spec, but higher than I would like to see over time personally. Chances are it'll be just fine, but if it was me and the work being done on it was important (which it sounds like it is) then I'd get a beefier cooling solution. In the 280mm bracket the Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 appears to rule the roost, both at Tom's Hardware and several other places. At 38mm it's uncommonly fat, which is a very good thing, and I believe it can be had both with (NO!) and without (YES!) RGB.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
581 (0.59/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Custom Watercooling
Memory G.Skill Trident Z Royal 2x16GB
Video Card(s) MSi RTX 3080ti Suprim X
Storage 2TB Corsair MP600 PRO Hydro X
Display(s) Samsung G7 27" x2
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 12 1500W
Mouse Logitech G903
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Pro
I would suggest that you just start using the computer before worrying about cooling. That CPU will run hot when under max load. But 90C is within spec and the boost frequency seems to be fine as well. No point tinkering unnecessarily with a new computer imho.
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2023
Messages
86 (0.22/day)
Glad it is working as intended :)
Not sure how much you like to tinker with your PC but undervolting the cpu can increase efficiency by a decent amount; +15% for my 12700k (every cpu is different! "silicon lottery")
There are multiple ways to go about it, one simple way would be in your bios under DigitAll Power lowering the CPU Loadline Calibration to Mode 3, 4, 5 or lower till Vcore/cpu core voltage is lowered under load compared to auto/default
Will take some trial and error (and crashes lol) to find a good undervolt that works in all workloads tho
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
26 (0.07/day)
Location
California
System Name Corsair Vengeance i7400 Prebuilt
Processor Intel i9-13900K
Motherboard MSI Z690-A WiFi DDR5
Cooling Corsair 240mm AIO, 3 front fans, 1 rear fan
Memory 64GB Corsair DDR5-5600
Video Card(s) ASUS 4090 TUF
Storage 2TB SSD
Display(s) BenQ 4K 32", BenQ 4K 27", Dell 4K 43", Dell 1920x1200 24"
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply Corsair 1000W 80 Plus Gold
I would suggest that you just start using the computer before worrying about cooling. That CPU will run hot when under max load. But 90C is within spec and the boost frequency seems to be fine as well. No point tinkering unnecessarily with a new computer imho.

Good advice. I should probably not modifying hardware at this time. Instead, I think I should learn more about the basics of BIOS. A reason that the thermal is not exceeding 90C is that I set the long term max power to 180 watts. This seems to be low for a i9-13900K CPU.

Glad it is working as intended :)
Not sure how much you like to tinker with your PC but undervolting the cpu can increase efficiency by a decent amount; +15% for my 12700k (every cpu is different! "silicon lottery")
There are multiple ways to go about it, one simple way would be in your bios under DigitAll Power lowering the CPU Loadline Calibration to Mode 3 or lower (Doing that will lower Vcore/cpu core voltage under load)
Will take some trial and error (and crashes lol) to find a good undervolt that works in all workloads tho

How is the +15% measured?

I am thinking to increase the long term max power to 200 watts and then lower the CPU loadline calibration. Should I try one at a time or both at the same time?
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2023
Messages
86 (0.22/day)
It's fine to do both, i have my power limit set to 150W
This is CPU-Z benchmark with default loadline:
Screenshot 2023-10-17 225155.png

And this one is with Loadline mode 3:
Screenshot 2023-10-17 225410.png

Close to 15% higher multi thread score with same power consumption
Note how far the Vcore drops with loadline mode 3 compared to my boards default loadline

Btw when overclocking or undervolting a cpu i can recommend y-cruncher to test for system stability
Running y-cruncher for a few minutes will tell a lot if the system is stable or not
Can also be used to benchmark and test for stability with a command like this: y-cruncher.exe bench 5b -od:0
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
26 (0.07/day)
Location
California
System Name Corsair Vengeance i7400 Prebuilt
Processor Intel i9-13900K
Motherboard MSI Z690-A WiFi DDR5
Cooling Corsair 240mm AIO, 3 front fans, 1 rear fan
Memory 64GB Corsair DDR5-5600
Video Card(s) ASUS 4090 TUF
Storage 2TB SSD
Display(s) BenQ 4K 32", BenQ 4K 27", Dell 4K 43", Dell 1920x1200 24"
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply Corsair 1000W 80 Plus Gold
I used Loadline mode 3 and increased the long term max power limit to 200w. With Cinebench R23, I saw thermal throttling within 2 minutes. At what core temp does it throttle?

1697592166499.png


Update: I used CPU Lite Load instead. I dialed it down from default of 9 to 7. With PL1=200w, it does not thermal throttle anymore! The CPU temp stayed at 81C most of the time during the R23 10 minute test.

Why do I need another test tool like y-cruncher when R23 stresses the CPU at 100% already?

1697601298796.png
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2023
Messages
86 (0.22/day)
Throttling should happen at 100°C according to intel spec and most motherboards should be set at that, limit can be changed to above 100°C but i wouldn't recommend that
Cool never used the CPU lite load feature... maybe i should give that a try too :)
Yeah R23 stresses the cpu fine but different programs/algorithms use the cpu differently (cpu can be at 100% load but with different parts of the cpu etc.) and so its possible that the cpu is stable with one program but not with another, so i often use multiple programs to check for stability after i've done any overclock/undervolt and cinebench and y-cruncher are my favorite
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
26 (0.07/day)
Location
California
System Name Corsair Vengeance i7400 Prebuilt
Processor Intel i9-13900K
Motherboard MSI Z690-A WiFi DDR5
Cooling Corsair 240mm AIO, 3 front fans, 1 rear fan
Memory 64GB Corsair DDR5-5600
Video Card(s) ASUS 4090 TUF
Storage 2TB SSD
Display(s) BenQ 4K 32", BenQ 4K 27", Dell 4K 43", Dell 1920x1200 24"
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply Corsair 1000W 80 Plus Gold
Strange that it already showed thermal throttling when a core hit 90C, as shown in the first diagram on post #62.

I further lowered the CPU Lite Load to 6. The max temp dropped a bit too. I used y-cruncher with the flags you specified above. It did not crash. :)

Is there any downside to this level of under-volt?
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2023
Messages
86 (0.22/day)
Nope as long as everything is stable there should be no downside
But i never used CPU lite load, make sure to benchmark single and multi-thread performance and compare it to no undervolt, there should be no performance loss
Also just wanna mention yet another undervolting method and that is setting cpu voltage mode to Adaptive + Offset and apply a negative offset of like 0.05V or more (not sure how low the average 13900k can go)
edit: well i just tried intel's overclocking software and damn didn't know you could undervolt with it (still im oldschool and bios is my thing not some fancy software haha... but it does seem useful)
1697611732154.png


edit2: found a good short video about why and how to undervolt:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 5, 2023
Messages
337 (0.80/day)
Location
USA
System Name Dark Palimpsest
Processor Intel i9 13900k with Optimus Foundation Block
Motherboard EVGA z690 Classified
Cooling MO-RA3 420mm Custom Loop
Memory G.Skill 6000CL30, 64GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia 4090 FE with Heatkiller Block
Storage 3 NVMe SSDs, 2TB-each, plus a SATA SSD
Display(s) Gigabyte FO32U2P (32" QD-OLED) , Asus ProArt PA248QV (24")
Case Be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900
Audio Device(s) Logitech G Pro X
Power Supply Be quiet! Straight Power 12 1200W
Mouse Logitech G502 X
Keyboard GMMK Pro + Numpad
As others have mentioned, the liquid freezer ii 280 is a great AIO, and they also mentioned the fat radiator, but I just wanted to point to that fact and let you know to make sure you have room for that thicker radiator before buying it. It will make the fans mount lower in the system (closer to the motherboard) and not every case has room for that. In some cases you can lower the motherboard, but not all of them. Also, I wouldn't put that AIO on the front as it will then put that hot air into the system, raising the ambient temperatures of your GPU, VRM, memory, etc. It's often not a deal-breaker to do that, but if your main use is putting the GPU under load, you want fresh air going to it as much as possible, so it's ideal to have that radiator as an exhaust in the top.

That said, the approach you've taken above seems to be good. I was going to suggest you can probably get away with an increase in PL1 and then do a slight voltage offset and gain performance without losing much in terms of temperatures, but it looks like you're there.

The Intel XTU app is helpful for doing some tuning within Windows, but I prefer to do my tuning in the BIOS. Sometimes it's helpful to find what works with the app then go back and try to run it in BIOS once you have those numbers figured out. the XTU settings only stick if you're running that at start-up. It would then apply those settings every time you boot the PC. This is normally fine, but I always prefer less background apps whenever possible, and if it's actually stable, it'll be stable if applied from BIOS.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
26 (0.07/day)
Location
California
System Name Corsair Vengeance i7400 Prebuilt
Processor Intel i9-13900K
Motherboard MSI Z690-A WiFi DDR5
Cooling Corsair 240mm AIO, 3 front fans, 1 rear fan
Memory 64GB Corsair DDR5-5600
Video Card(s) ASUS 4090 TUF
Storage 2TB SSD
Display(s) BenQ 4K 32", BenQ 4K 27", Dell 4K 43", Dell 1920x1200 24"
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply Corsair 1000W 80 Plus Gold
I think I am done with the performance tuning of my PC. Thanks again to everyone who has chimed in to help. My current setting is PL1=230w, PL2=253w, and Tau=56s. I use CPU Lite Load to under volt the CPU and set it at 5. I have stress tested it with a few tools and it has been stable. The max max core temp is in the 80s with CB R23 10 minute MC test, and it has a score of 37000 when I set Windows 11 Pro in its "best power efficiency" mode. The 8 P-core's frequency is between 5.2GHz and 5.5GHz during the stress test. For some reason, "best power efficiency" mode yields the highest CB R23 10-min MC score.

This prebuilt PC now is better than the one I received from Corsair 3.5 months ago! :)
 
Top