- Joined
- Mar 29, 2007
- Messages
- 4,838 (0.74/day)
System Name | Aquarium |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 9 7950x |
Motherboard | ROG Strix X670-E |
Cooling | Lian Li Galahead 360 AIO |
Memory | 2x16gb Flare X5 Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR5-6000 PC5-48000 |
Video Card(s) | Asus RTX 3060 |
Storage | 2TB WD SN850X Black NVMe, 500GB Samsung 970 NVMe |
Display(s) | Gigabyte 32" IPS 144Hz |
Case | Hyte Y60 |
Power Supply | Corsair RMx 850 |
Software | Win 11 Pro/ PopOS! |
I still fail to see how .5 is substantial in any way, regardless of area. I don't know if I'm misinterpreting something, but that just seems minimal to me.
I'm having trouble finding links to explain it thoroughly, basically, the worlds global mean temperature is thought to be fairly constant over a 100 year period. Geologically speaking, this is a very short amount of time. When applied to an overall average, if the temperature changes more rapidly, more drastic effects are seen. Think of anything where global averages can be compared to small groups. Off the top of my head, think test scores. If a particular class average were to drop by say 5 points overall, it's not very significant to humanity as a whole. If everyone in the world were to take that test and the global average dropped 5 points, that points to something drastic taking place, because averages tend to go to the middle. Perhaps that is a poor example, but averages statistically speaking tend to not vary much, especially when on a global scale. When talking about climate, a move of a few degrees in global average over a short period of time indicates drastic climate change. I wish I could explain it better, maybe I'll think of a better way if that still isn't making sense.