Metro Exodus Benchmark Performance, RTX & DLSS

[Super XP]

This pretty much sums up the whole discussion about RTX: it's in its infancy. If you want to be an early adopter (and can afford the asking price), go ahead and show your support. If you like things ironed out for you, then wait.
But no, this level of common sense cannot be expected on the Internet. We need to go all sjw and point out how companies are evil and such instead.

Less We Forget....
https://www.reddit.com/r/AMD_Stock/comments/8rbdtb
More like Self Induced by Nvidia's gimmicky. If anything.

 

[bug]

Less We Forget....
https://www.reddit.com/r/AMD_Stock/comments/8rbdtb
More like Self Induced by Nvidia's gimmicky. If anything.

Man, you've shown me

 

[londiste]

Less We Forget....
https://www.reddit.com/r/AMD_Stock/comments/8rbdtb More like Self Induced by Nvidia's gimmicky. If anything.

This video is honestly too long to thoroughly analyze and comment on but also remember that this is a very biased and one-sided video. The facts are not wrong but other facts are purposefully neglected and everything is presented with a certain angle. Jim is a pretty good speaker and as usual with videos he can simply talk you to death.

 

[Frutika007]

For those who were saying TPU is wrong, Techspot/Hardware Unboxed's benchmark results are up and they are pretty much very close to TPU's result. Also keep in mind that TPU tested the day 1 version where techspot/hardware unboxed waited and tested the after patch version - https://www.techspot.com/review/1795-metro-exodus-benchmarks/

 

[Mescalamba]

Doubt TPU is wrong since I saw review which shows pretty much exactly the same and its coming from ATi fanboy run webpage that does "reviews". And even there RVII barely touches RTX 2080.

Only thing I can come up is that not all RVII are same and its not like everyone is using exactly same stuff around. And since modern GPUs overclock (boost clock) pretty much based on how good piece you get in lottery, it can mess up with results a bit.

 

[OneMoar]

the only youtube reviewer I trust for benchmarks is GN and his results agree with TPU
yall can take your nobody youtubers and stuff it

let me remind you of the hardware review pecking order

review sites are first always has been always will be you-tubers are always second they get there info from sites like Techpowerup, Anandtech, Jonnyguru, guru3d, ect ect

I just finished metro not 10m ago and I played the entire thing with RTX off I found that with a properly calibrated gamma curve RTX provides very little and tends to make things overly dark and the extra shadows are not worth the 40% hit in fps after a hour I forgot it existed and never bothered switching it back on

 

[Vlada011]

4K Resolution High Settings vs 1080p RTX I choose 4K always.
4K Resolution 60fps vs 1440p 100 fps I choose 4K always.


Why they even show us effects on 1080p when people can't enable them on 3840 or 3860 resolution?
Why? When in previous years they show us how picture was clear and nice and no need for filters on so high resolution compare to 1080p.
Now they will show us effects playable on 1080p... And who swallow such things, I'm curious to met such profiles?

For normal people reaction would be Oooh nice, great... Come one NVDIA hurry up we want playable fps on 4K with those effects and high settings.
Until then no money for you. When they develop more, when games adopt, when we got clear evidence that this will not finish as PhysX because PhysX was closer to reality than RTX and without serious improvement in that direction no simulation of reality and again they didn't do nothing years.