• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Microsoft Adds New Game-centric Features to Universal Windows Platform

Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
527 (0.12/day)
System Name CUBE_NXT
Processor i9 12900K @ 5.0Ghz all P-cores with E-cores enabled
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling EK AIO Elite Cooler w/ 3 Phanteks T30 fans
Memory 64GB DDR5 @ 5600Mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA 3090Ti Ultra Hybrid Gaming w/ 3 Phanteks T30 fans
Storage 1 x SK Hynix P41 Platinum 1TB, 1 x 2TB, 1 x WD_BLACK SN850 2TB, 1 x WD_RED SN700 4TB
Display(s) Alienware AW3418DW
Case Lian-Li O11 Dynamic Evo w/ 3 Phanteks T30 fans
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME 1000W Titanium
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Let me guess, you don't really appreciate differences of opinion or debating, do you? You're one of those that MUST be right, else your world will crash down around you? :)
When you're spouting off objectively incorrect facts - no, I don't just let someone argue from a position of lies and get away with it. Hiding behind "difference of opinion" when your opinion isn't reflected by reality, is like a flat earther telling me their belief that the Earth is flat can't be wrong, because it's just like, their opinion, man.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
527 (0.12/day)
System Name CUBE_NXT
Processor i9 12900K @ 5.0Ghz all P-cores with E-cores enabled
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling EK AIO Elite Cooler w/ 3 Phanteks T30 fans
Memory 64GB DDR5 @ 5600Mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA 3090Ti Ultra Hybrid Gaming w/ 3 Phanteks T30 fans
Storage 1 x SK Hynix P41 Platinum 1TB, 1 x 2TB, 1 x WD_BLACK SN850 2TB, 1 x WD_RED SN700 4TB
Display(s) Alienware AW3418DW
Case Lian-Li O11 Dynamic Evo w/ 3 Phanteks T30 fans
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME 1000W Titanium
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Can you use OpenGL or an external library?

This is an honest question. I've never tried developing a UWP app and am going by the article above.
I couldn't say myself. It looks like it wouldn't certified for the store, but from a technical standpoint it is doable. Even if that's the case, you can develop it and release it on your own, because as I've said for the billionth time (that hilariously, people above me are still getting wrong - facts are hard I guess) UWP isn't intrinsically tied to the Store and if you want to avoid a curated garden, then just avoid it. It's as simple as that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/WPDev/comments/3uvrrs/questions_about_opengl_and_universal_windows_apps/
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
145 (0.03/day)
UWP is effectively a MS-controlled ecosystem within Windows. If this cancer is allowed to gain market share, users lose control over their applications, MS will be judge and jury with regards to what works and what doesn't, and all our machines take the massive step backward into the closed box ecosystem that those losers over at Apple are bound to.

I really could care less about the sandbox and its security. MS has built an OS that works very well today but they keep trying to push their market strategy within that OS and UWP is the worst iteration of it to date. They get more and more devious about it and it is scary as fuck. At the same time, they have been building on an OS that has very specific perks such as its configurable nature, both in hard- and software, and UWP is the one thing that will destroy all those perks in one strike. And all that, only to cater to a silly market strategy that does nothing to further the PC environment, but everything to cater to tablets and mobile devices. As always, security is used as the cover for pushing more control over the customer and the user, just like governments use terrorism and child pornography to reduce or remove civil rights.

UWP is of the same caliber as the dreaded Windows 8 Metro UI release, it's just a different tool for the same purpose. One Windows. One MS Store. One race to the bottom. They really do love taking one step forward and two steps back, just when you think they saw the light with Windows 10, they launch UWP and they do it with a level of arrogance that we know all too well. If this was really 'for its users' then it would not be enforced, it would be offered. Right now, this is just MS changing the rules of the game when the majority of its players have already entered it. The timing of UWP's launch and the state it got launched in, says enough. In the meantime, actual products that actual users paid actual money for, work like crap on it.

Now what they *should* do, if they want what people in this thread state UWP is for, is keep improving and keep monitoring Win32 and its security. That is all, and it means doing some work for nothing more than the continuation of a near-monopoly on Operating Systems. Apparently for MS, this is not enough or too much work. UWP is a solution for an imaginary problem and a vehicle for pushing a market strategy.

Henry Ford — 'If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.'

Get on with the times, it's not perfect right now by any means, but it has a lot of potential and it's heading in the right direction.
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
13,978 (2.35/day)
Location
Louisiana
Processor Core i9-9900k
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax ETS-T50 Black CPU cooler
Memory 32GB (2x16) Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 4070 Ti Super OC 16GB
Storage 1x 1TB MX500 (OS); 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 2TB MX500; 1x 1TB BX500 SSD; 1x 6TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) Infievo 27" 165Hz @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-1000 Gold
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
When you're spouting off objectively incorrect facts - no, I don't just let someone argue from a position of lies and get away with it. Hiding behind "difference of opinion" when your opinion isn't reflected by reality, is like a flat earther telling me their belief that the Earth is flat can't be wrong, because it's just like, their opinion, man.

Let it go man. Do you have a personal stake in MS stock? My view, which is based on the FACTS of MS deliberately or incompetently reoeatedly driving PC gaming down does not make one bit of difference in whether MS lets UWP die or prosper. It does show them to be vastly untrustworthy in that arena, though.

So don't take it so personally. It's ok that everyone does not agree on everything.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,334 (6.03/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Henry Ford — 'If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.'

Get on with the times, it's not perfect right now by any means, but it has a lot of potential and it's heading in the right direction.

I agree that some of the perks UWP offers are worthwhile. But then release it when they are actually worthwhile, taking all parts of the deal into consideration. Right now they place every game application in shackles, eagerly waiting for that perfection. Why not make it an optional mode, make the investment of actually beta testing it in actual releases as a separate option for a while? They just could handle this so much better and once again, they do not. It is once again typical of MS - and it works against them.
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
145 (0.03/day)
I agree that some of the perks UWP offers are worthwhile. But then release it when they are actually worthwhile, taking all parts of the deal into consideration. Right now they place every game application in shackles, eagerly waiting for that perfection. Why not make it an optional mode, make the investment of actually beta testing it in actual releases as a separate option for a while? They just could handle this so much better and once again, they do not. It is once again typical of MS - and it works against them.

Unfortunately, in these past couple of years Microsoft has tried to undo all the wrongs by doing a whole lot of stuff and it's as clear as it can be that they're overwhelmed by it. They got better and organizing the chaos, but there's a long way to go until they do stuff right from the get-go.
The issue lies with the management, if I were to steer the craft I'd probably fire 50% of those that take decisions since they're basically idiots.
Also, I'd fire 99% of the designers, since they're a) blind; b) incredibly stupid. I'd go for both options.
 
Top