MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming Z 8 GB

[headik]

What "other" reviews? Both TPU and Anandtech place 2070 between 1080 and 1080Ti (all FE at that). HardOCP doesn't have a direct comparison (base 1080 is missing from their mix), but they still came to the same conclusion: "This puts the new MSI GeForce RTX 2070 at about the middle-way between a factory overclocked GeForce GTX 1080 and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti."

techspot-2070 is 7% faster than 1080 and 1080TI wipes the floor with 2070
https://www.techspot.com/review/1727-nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070/
On cb.de the 1080TI is 20% faster than 2070 and 2070 is 8% faster than 1080
https://www.computerbase.de/2018-10/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-test/3/
Even on guru3d with same card 2070 gaming Z the 1080TI is average 13% faster in 1440p.And yes guru3d uses also crap 1080TI Fe at 1700Mhz.AIB 1080TI is 10% faster so 23% faster than 2070 gaming Z.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/msi_geforce_rtx_2070_gaming_z_review,1.html

Only here 2070 gamingz=1080TI

 

[jabbadap]

techspot-2070 is 7% faster than 1080 and 1080TI wipes the floor with 2070
https://www.techspot.com/review/1727-nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070/
On cb.de the 1080TI is 20% faster than 2070 and 2070 is 8% faster than 1080
https://www.computerbase.de/2018-10/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-test/3/
Even on guru3d with same card 2070 gaming Z the 1080TI is average 13% faster in 1440p.And yes guru3d uses also crap 1080TI Fe at 1700Mhz.AIB 1080TI is 10% faster so 23% faster than 2070 gaming Z.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/msi_geforce_rtx_2070_gaming_z_review,1.html

Only here 2070 gamingz=1080TI

So do the math, take the same six games from this review and compare them to guru3d. Do realize W1zzard uses variety of games that differs from other reviews. Some of them works better on Turing arch than Pascal and some of them don't.

 

[rtwjunkie]

Only here 2070 gamingz=1080TI

Exaggeration seems to be your strong suit. I surely don’t see it equaling it.

 

[trog100]

Exaggeration seems to be your strong suit. I surely don’t see it equaling it.

i think the 1080ti stocks will soon run out so this argument will be somewhat academic..

the 2070 card will be the high-ish end card to buy for those that want value for money without the slightest doubt..

trog

 

[rtwjunkie]

the 2070 card will be the high-ish end card to buy for those that want value for money without the slightest doubt..

No doubt. I can’t argue with that assessment.

It will still be a tested card versus new cards for awhile, so someone completely making up facts on W1z reviews isn’t gonna cut it.

 

[bug]

techspot-2070 is 7% faster than 1080 and 1080TI wipes the floor with 2070
https://www.techspot.com/review/1727-nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070/
On cb.de the 1080TI is 20% faster than 2070 and 2070 is 8% faster than 1080
https://www.computerbase.de/2018-10/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2070-test/3/
Even on guru3d with same card 2070 gaming Z the 1080TI is average 13% faster in 1440p.And yes guru3d uses also crap 1080TI Fe at 1700Mhz.AIB 1080TI is 10% faster so 23% faster than 2070 gaming Z.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/msi_geforce_rtx_2070_gaming_z_review,1.html

Only here 2070 gamingz=1080TI

So... they all place 2070 between 1080 and 1080Ti?

 

[trog100]

So... they all place 2070 between 1080 and 1080Ti?

thats about where it sits by my thinking.. as for value for money its way out in front.. tis a shame they gimped the sli option..

trog

 

[ppn]

2070 NonFE is 2% slower than FE, in case of Asus turbo is 8% and Asus strix is 17% faster than 1080FE.