- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 31,732 (7.24/day)
Exactly!however, where does it go? My current SSD is under the GPU.
Exactly!however, where does it go? My current SSD is under the GPU.
System Name | DarkStar |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master 1.0 (BIOS F39g) |
Cooling | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420mm AIO (rev4) |
Memory | 4x8GB Patriot Viper DDR4 4400C19 @ 3733Mhz 14-14-13-27 1T |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16GB GDDR6 @ 3400Mhz Core/22Gbps Mem |
Storage | 1TB Samsung 990 Pro (OS);2TB Samsung PM9A1;4TB XPG S70 Blade (Games);14TB WD UltraStar HC530 (Video) |
Display(s) | 27" LG UltraGear 27GS85Q-B @ 2560x1440 @ 200Hz, Nano-IPS |
Case | be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900 Rev.2 |
Audio Device(s) | SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless |
Power Supply | 1000W Seasonic PRIME Ultra Titanium;600W APC SMT750i UPS |
Mouse | Logitech G604 |
Keyboard | Logitech G910 Orion Spark |
Software | Windows 11 Pro x64 24H2 (Build 26100.4351) |
Hence why MSI coming with this NOW is even more stupid. This would have made some sense last year but now when 2nd revision of Gen5 drives come out that are cooler it's overkill.
Right but's not exactly a solution, you're just kicking the can down the road. As with normal CPU/GPU or any advanced piece of Si the energy density is only going up with node shrinks. Also the controller heats up because of the work they do i.e. you can throttle them harder to kinda run them cool, like smartphones, or that nanotube(?) cooling or whatever TSMC was working on!The solution is to make controllers that produce less heat, just as the newly shown ones by Phison seem to do.
System Name | The Workhorse |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen R9 5900X |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Aorus B550 Pro |
Cooling | CPU - Noctua NH-D15S Case - 3 Noctua NF-A14 PWM at the bottom, 2 Fractal Design 180mm at the front |
Memory | GSkill Trident Z 3200CL14 |
Video Card(s) | NVidia GTX 1070 MSI QuickSilver |
Storage | Adata SX8200Pro 1 TB |
Display(s) | LG 32GK850G |
Case | Fractal Design Torrent (Solid) |
Audio Device(s) | Sennheiser HD598, FiiO E-10K DAC/AMP, Samson Meteorite USB Microphone |
Power Supply | Corsair RMx850 (2018) |
Mouse | Zaopin Z1 Pro on a X-Raypad Equate Plus V2 |
Keyboard | Cooler Master QuickFire Rapid TKL (Cherry MX Black) |
Software | Windows 11 Pro (24H2) |
Yeah, but this is something that comes with the incessant demands for increases in speed on NAND SSDs. Theoretically, the “perfect solution” is probably figuring out a different architecture for the drives altogether, perhaps something that would actually allow progress besides just linear R/W speeds. This also might lessen the need for going up another PCI-E generation, since aforementioned linear speeds are actually mostly irrelevant in mainstream applications. Optane was an attempt, but with well known failures and is dead now. I think something of that type must be pursued. Otherwise, what is next? Gen 6 SSDs? How impossible would the controller be to cool there? For how little gain?Right but's not exactly a solution, you're just kicking the can down the road. As with normal CPU/GPU or any advanced piece of Si the energy density is only going up with node shrinks. Also the controller heats up because of the work they do i.e. you can throttle them harder to kinda run them cool, like smartphones, or that nanotube(?) cooling or whatever TSMC was working on!
A possible alternative is massive (SLC)caches like really massive but that would eat up capacity from the NAND chips.