• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

New 36-inch Monitor From EIZO Packs 4096 x 2160 Pixels Resolution

Sweet can't wait for this kinda thing to become affordable.

By then you'de be better off getting a holo-monitor.

Me just wondered, how much would a 3D version of this monitor cost ?
 
stupid question :

if i watch some sd (or even hd 720p) movie with this monitor, won't it look bad?
 
By then you'de be better off getting a holo-monitor.

Me just wondered, how much would a 3D version of this monitor cost ?

5


Samsung unveiled a prototype not to long ago. 70" 3D LCD with 240Hz refresh rate that can display 4000x2000 (4k x 2k) no release date or price but I bet it will be cheaper than this :)
 
Love the looks, flat and sharp looking (Just what i loved about the older Samsung LCD's) but every thing else is fail..
 
at least it has a tuner, scaler, HDMI port and is affordable.
 
Since this monitor is obviously not aimed at gamers I bet it runs at something like 14ms.

I'd be so pissed if it got even one dead pixel.
See that little black dot there!
No?
See! See! right there!
No?
Squint a little then!
 
I don't like this monitor

I want it to be :

At least 50"

10-Bit color

2ms RT

178° viewing angles

~4kx~2k

21:9 AR

~1000$

With Ultra-HD Movie content in the market

With powerful enough Single-GPU cards in market

That is what I want , less than that and I am not interested :shadedshu
 
This is gonna be sweet paired with 4x GTX580's!
 
$36,000!!! Damn! I like a nice, big monitor as much as the next guy, but DAMN!! I don't care what the resolution is, that is just outrageous!

thats the price of a brand new car :roll:
 
I don't like this monitor

I want it to be :

At least 50"

10-Bit color

2ms RT

178° viewing angles

~4kx~2k

21:9 AR

~1000$

With Ultra-HD Movie content in the market

With powerful enough Single-GPU cards in market

That is what I want , less than that and I am not interested :shadedshu
Keep dreaming buddy
 
A quad SLIed 580s would smother them. Nvidia FTW :rockout:

It is true that GTX580 is faster than HD6970

But :

1-CF Scaling with HD6000 series is better than GTX500 scaling

2-AMD Cayman scales way better with higher resolutions


Keep dreaming buddy

I will till it comes true :toast:
 
This is gonna be sweet paired with 4x GTX580's!

cant wait to see your bills at the end of month..

It is true that GTX580 is faster than HD6970

But :

1-CF Scaling with HD6000 series is better than GTX500 scaling

2-AMD Cayman scales way better with higher resolutions

I will till it comes true :toast:

HD6xxx CF and GTX5xx SLI had the same scaling. the problem is just which game do they favor better. so for this, they both wins..
 
cant wait to see your bills at the end of month..



HD6xxx CF and GTX5xx SLI had the same scaling. the problem is just which game do they favor better. so for this, they both wins..

If this was true I would have gone w/ SLI GTX 560 ti's instead of CF HD 6950's. SLI scaling was around 50% while CF scaling was ~90%
 
LMFAO @ the price!! far out!! too much :P
i'd rather buy 6 monitors and 10 pc's :P
 
Back
Top