• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NEW - 3DMark 11 Compilation

It was the graphic score that went down but I've noticed with Windows 8 my runs vary from boot to boot, strange huh.

Anyway.
Techtu|Sapphire HD7950 Dual-X Flex|1025\1450|7941|AMD 1090T @4Ghz
3dmark run.jpg
 
Had to push 1.62V to CPU to get 4.2GHz. Thanks go to my H100 :)

PHaS3|MSI GeForce GTX 680 2GB|1059/1109/6000|P9067|AMD Phenom II 1100T @ 4.2GHz

3Dm11_1.jpg
 
Seems a bit high. All the phenoms are a bit different tho. My 1090t could do 4.2 with 1.55 but 4.3 needed well over 1.6
 
PHaS3|MSI GeForce GTX 680 2GB|1106/1159/6208|P9208|AMD Phenom II 1100T @ 4.3GHz

This took some doing... I doubt I can get higher without a new CPU.

3DM11_2.jpg
 
That 680 should have more in the tank... also what clocks is your CPU at? You show idle...
 
That 680 should have more in the tank... also what clocks is your CPU at? You show idle...

why you know read.... need coffee ? :roll:

PHaS3|MSI GeForce GTX 680 2GB|1106/1159/6208|P9208|AMD Phenom II 1100T @ 4.3GHz
 
Here's my TriFire HD7970 score:
GamerGuy|3x HD7970 3GB|1100/1450|P21051|Intel LGA2011 i7 3960X @4.375ghz
21k3dm11.jpg
 
Nice score but I think your sand baggin ;)

can those cards run 1500MHz on the memory?

Disable tessellation in the Catalyst control center and see what score you get.
OK, I'm game, I disabled Tessellation in CCC, ran the benchmark at exactly the same GPU and CPU speed:
3dm11tessoff.jpg

I don't think this is accepted as there's a message that state that score is invalid due to Tess being modified in CCC.....
 
PHaS3|MSI GeForce GTX 680 2GB|1106/1159/6208|P9208|AMD Phenom II 1100T @ 4.3GHz

This took some doing... I doubt I can get higher without a new CPU.

http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=49522&stc=1&d=1356617256

I'm sure you can squeeze more out of that 680. Probably a few hundred more points worth


there's a message that state that score is invalid due to Tess being modified in CCC.....

Aw, who cares what they say. The number's bigger. lol
 
Last edited:
I'm sure you can squeeze more out of that 680. Probably a few hundred more points worth
I don't think he can go much further due to CPU limitation. I ran the benchmark with 2x GTXX670 SLI'ed and an FX8120 @3.7ghz and got my score trashed due to CPU score, the benchmark loves Intel CPU, and barely tolerates AMD CPU. 3DMARK 11 = Intel->:nutkick:<-AMD
 
Gamerguy can you oc the cpu higher ?
 
OK, I'm game, I disabled Tessellation in CCC, ran the benchmark at exactly the same GPU and CPU speed:
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/9242/3dm11tessoff.jpg
I don't think this is accepted as there's a message that state that score is invalid due to Tess being modified in CCC.....
Yeah I thought it be higher but checking mine with Tess on and off was only a difference of 1233 points.

Yours was 1462... I thought it be higher then that. Crank up the memory my friend!!!

I run my 6990 @ 1500MHz but sence MSI AB did something I cant go any higher on the frequency. :mad:
 
Aw, who cares what they say. The number's bigger. lol
LMAO!:laugh: That's true, let see which OP will accept as my final score then.:)

DOM said:
Gamerguy can you oc the cpu higher ?
My CPU is an odd one, previously I couldn't go higher than 4.25ghz w/o instability setting in (I MUST be doing something wrong! :o ), but now at the same voltage, it stabilised @4.375ghz, I did try 4.5ghz and it was a right royal mess, scared the BeJesus outta me when I got a BSOD on desktop.:twitch: Anyway, I'm happy with it for now, even got my RAM to do 1166.7mhz (2333mhz effective), so let's say I'm satisfied for now.:toast:

Fullinfusion said:
Yeah I thought it be higher but checking mine with Tess on and off was only a difference of 1233 points.

Yours was 1462... I thought it be higher then that. Crank up the memory my friend!!!

I run my 6990 @ 1500MHz but sence MSI AB did something I cant go any higher on the frequency
Umm, would like to, but I'm afraid that the rather tight squeeze I have my cards in isn't favorable for OCing, unless I go water that is. Here's a pic of my cards, the top card (reference Sapp HD7970) goes up to ~80C under heavy load, so heat's definitely my worst enemy.
TriCFX2.jpg
 
Last edited:
LMAO!:laugh: That's true, let see which OP will accept as my final score then.:)


My CPU is an odd one, previously I couldn't go higher than 4.25ghz w/o instability setting in (I MUST be doing something wrong! :o ), but now at the same voltage, it stabilised @4.375ghz, I did try 4.5ghz and it was a right royal mess, scared the BeJesus outta me when I got a BSOD on desktop.:twitch: Anyway, I'm happy with it for now, even got my RAM to do 1166.7mhz (2333mhz effective), so let's say I'm satisfied for now.:toast:

Umm, would like to, but I'm afraid that the rather tight squeeze I have my cards in isn't favorable for OCing, unless I go water that is. Here's a pic of my cards, the top card (reference Sapp HD7970) goes up to ~80C under heavy load, so heat's definitely my worst enemy.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v333/mikeysg/TriCFX2.jpg
Bahh 80c pffft! Thats nothing. I'll crank mine up and post a screenie of my gpus temp :cool:

But hey I skipped this 7 gen series this time around and dont know much on how they clock,, But 8 series moohahahhhahh I was born at night but not in the 7 series night hahahahh

8990 gimme one NOW :pimp:
 
LMAO!:laugh: That's true, let see which OP will accept as my final score then.:)


My CPU is an odd one, previously I couldn't go higher than 4.25ghz w/o instability setting in (I MUST be doing something wrong! :o ), but now at the same voltage, it stabilised @4.375ghz, I did try 4.5ghz and it was a right royal mess, scared the BeJesus outta me when I got a BSOD on desktop.:twitch: Anyway, I'm happy with it for now, even got my RAM to do 1166.7mhz (2333mhz effective), so let's say I'm satisfied for now.:toast:

Umm, would like to, but I'm afraid that the rather tight squeeze I have my cards in isn't favorable for OCing, unless I go water that is. Here's a pic of my cards, the top card (reference Sapp HD7970) goes up to ~80C under heavy load, so heat's definitely my worst enemy.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v333/mikeysg/TriCFX2.jpg

Yeah I never had a lga 2011 so can't help with the oc settings XD but I would think 5ghz for benching



Bahh 80c pffft! Thats nothing. I'll crank mine up and post a screenie of my gpus temp :cool:

But hey I skipped this 7 gen series this time around and dont know much on how they clock,, But 8 series moohahahhhahh I was born at night but not in the 7 series night hahahahh

8990 gimme one NOW :pimp:
yeah 80c for the cpu but the vrm temps also matter there hotter then the gpu most of the time and you don't want them to get to hot
 
Lulz @ 80c. My 670 has never been higher than 50c, even at 1400mhz on the core
 
Well I will have to run GPUZ then to see where the VRM's max out at.

Here is my last modest run

hightemp.jpg


tpu.jpg




Lulz @ 80c. My 670 has never been higher than 50c, even at 1400mhz on the core
Yeah your lucky that 1090T can even run that gpu lulz!!! Difference in coolers my man! You should know that :toast:
 
Lulz @ 80c. My 670 has never been higher than 50c, even at 1400mhz on the core
Well, when you have three such cards in such close proximity, you'd definitely NOT be getting that temp even with the awesome WF3 coolers.;)

@fullinfusion, when I get back from work, I will run graphically intensive games and see what my VRM temp is like....never thought to use GPUZ to monitor it before.:o
 
Yeah I don't even know what an acceptable temp for the VRM's should be.

I pulled out the gpu and used compressed air to blow out the dust bunnies out... This gpu has the fan in the center of the card and exhausts out both ends.

It was good for a 10-15c lower temp, but I also redid my fan to rad orientation so that may as well helped.
 
Back
Top