• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NEW Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0 Scores

reran with little more tweak got a higher score yeah
00004.png
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (10).jpg
    Screenshot (10).jpg
    1,015 KB · Views: 500
here is mine fullscreen
6700K @ stock 4.0Ghz
R9 Fury @ stock 1050/500 Mhz

valley-2017-03-24-13-00-33-300.jpg
 
New card new score :)

6700K @ stock 4.00Ghz
EVGA 980ti Classified @ stock boost 1392/1753Mhz (in valley shows 1582Mhz on gpu???)

valley-2017-05-04-13-25-36-644.jpg
 
i5-7600K @ 5.0GHz + GTX1070 @ 2062/8900 = 4168
 

Attachments

  • adonaras valley.jpg
    adonaras valley.jpg
    774 KB · Views: 557
Ran this on an older screen, hence the weird resolution.


1700X score.JPG
 
i7 5820K @ 4.5GHz DDR4 16GB @ 3200MHz

MSI GTX 1080 Ti @ 2050/1500 Core Clock -MEM Clock = 6145






x2rHE2D.jpg
 
Same weird screen as my post #305 hence the weird resolution.
I replaced the Gigabyte 8GB RX480 G1-Gaming pair with another pair of GPUs.
The new cards are also Gigabyte G1-Gaming 8GB cards, but these are GTX-1070s with a much better score.
They also run cooler than the Rx480s do.

https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/attachments/1700x-score-jpg.89192/


Valley 1070 SLI.JPG
 
I got Ryzen 1600 and X370 motherboard as temporary placeholders until Threadripper comes out :)

Here's score on my 1080p monitor:

2egd5df.jpg
 
vjeks said:
I got Ryzen 1600 and X370 motherboard as temporary placeholders until Threadripper comes out :)

Here's score on my 1080p monitor:

2egd5df.jpg
Click to expand...
Nice score! I'm going to put that on the list with the clocks shown in the screenshot. R5-1600 @ 3.7GHz + GTX 1080 Ti @ 2025/1251. If those aren't correct you need to let me know what the actual clocks are.
 
MrGenius said:
Nice score! I'm going to put that on the list with the clocks shown in the screenshot. R5-1600 @ 3.7GHz + GTX 1080 Ti @ 2025/1251. If those aren't correct you need to let me know what the actual clocks are.
Click to expand...


Hey, thanks!

I got a tiny bit higher score during the second run. I didn't change anything on my system compared to the first benchmark.

Graphics card is Gigabyte 1080 Ti Aorus, with OC mode selected within Aorus software. I haven't OC it manually.
I provided now my GPU-Z as well, so you can see GPU/mem clocks. Seems that mem was higher clocked during 2nd run for some reason.

The R5-1600 is @ 3.7GHz, that is correct. Overclocked using stock Wraith cooler @1.25V.
Temperatures are not exceeding 72° C under stress testing and it's around 45-ish° C when idle.

Unfortunately I still can't reach 3200MHz on my DDR4 - Ryzen loves faster memory. BIOS updates should sort it out.
Before the latest update, I was unable to post with RAM above 2133MHz. After the update, it's working @ 2800MHz.

I believe that I might get the score quite near or slightly above 5K using Valley bench if I manage to use RAM at 3200. Valley score difference between the 2133 and 2800MHz DDR4 was about 440.


29452ea.jpg
 
Last edited:
What, how is that possible. I mean my old system is still on the top 10 list for multi GPU after all this time?

Any way time to join the single GPU as well.

Well new old system + brand new GPU means a new score.

i7 980X @ 4.67 GHz + EVGA GTX 1080 TI 2050/1526 = 5623

00002.png


valley_bench.jpg
 
Very nice @ post above!

I wanted to add a new score with measly 100MHz OC on R5-1600. That's the most I would go at the moment when using stock air cooler, considering thermals within reasonable margins. Nothing else was changed.

I play games at 4K, so I'm not at the moment bothered too much with the score as 1080p is CPU bound territory. Can't wait to get the Threadripper, as I need a beastly workstation CPU. :)

kcdq2v.jpg
 
vjeks said:
Very nice @ post above!

I wanted to add a new score with measly 100MHz OC on R5-1600. That's the most I would go at the moment when using stock air cooler, considering thermals within reasonable margins. Nothing else was changed.

I play games at 4K, so I'm not at the moment bothered too much with the score as 1080p is CPU bound territory. Can't wait to get the Threadripper, as I need a beastly workstation CPU. :)

kcdq2v.jpg
Click to expand...

thanks.

You cut try and cramp up clocks on gpu and vram and see if that maybe help a bit to up the score. But CPU clocks does also have a lot to say in this benchmark.
 
Tomgang said:
What, how is that possible. I mean my old system is still on the top 10 list for multi GPU after all this time?

Any way time to join the single GPU as well.

Well new old system + brand new GPU means a new score.

i7 980X @ 4.67 GHz + EVGA GTX 1080 TI 2050/1526 = 5623

00002.png


valley_bench.jpg
Click to expand...

That i7 980x is still a beast even after all these years. And when you OC it and then pair it with that 1080 ti you're gonna be getting really great scores. Especially at 1080p.
 
hapkiman said:
That i7 980x is still a beast even after all these years. And when you OC it and then pair it with that 1080 ti you're gonna be getting really great scores. Especially at 1080p.
Click to expand...

Jep good old X58 is still no slug. To be honest i exspected more bottleneck than i got here because while heaven is not so cpu needy valley is and i where a bit scare of how much will PCIe 2 hold this card back. turns out not much if any. All benchmarks shows an inprovement so far from GTX 970 sli to GTX 1080 TI. Games also benefitted from it. specially with optimized multithread games. I have a bunch of benchmark proving it, but will not post it here, since that will be off topic.

The most fun thing is while my old I7 920 hold my GTX 970 SLI back a bit, with the I7 980X it whas the 970 sli that holds back my CPU.

And even my old setup I7 920 setup is still on the top 10 for multi GPU.

X58 has truly been a great invest ment back then. Ass the system is now i can go for 2 more years on X58.
 
First generation GCN

hd7950.png
 
I think the top 10 single gpu group should be renamed the '1080 posse'
 
R5 1600 @ 3.8GHz + GTX 1070 @ 2025/2202 = 4013
(yeah i know valley shows gpu clock @ 2062, but thats was only for a few seconds at the start, 99% of the test it ran @ 2025mhz, but if that's a problem then you can add it as 2062mhz)

 
valley_2017_08_19_16_02_44_969.jpg
 
If i set 2xAA i got 44.1 FPS witch is quite decent for a 5 year old gpu.

Interesting thing wast if i turned of Motion blur i lost 1fps :confused:
 
FreedomEclipse said:
I think the top 10 single gpu group should be renamed the '1080 posse'
Click to expand...
Until someone comes through here with a Titan, that list will probably be 1080s for a while, unless the newest AMD GPU can score highly. I'm curious to see how those run, though I was definitely hoping for more out of them.
 
hi everyone im new here:d
INTEL CORE i7 6850K @ 4.5ghz
GTX 1080 TI LIGHTNING Z @ 65+/400+
for my cores anything above 2037 is unstable and also weirdlly for memory i can not push above 400+ for full stability :o:( i have tested manytimes and i dont know how is this possible that on a limited MONSTER card like LIGHTNING Z you get 60+/400+ :|
00003.jpg
n1.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top