NEW Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0 Scores

[irate_primate]

hi everyone im new here:d
INTEL CORE i7 6850K @ 4.5ghz
GTX 1080 TI LIGHTNING Z @ 65+/400+
for my cores anything above 2037 is unstable and also weirdlly for memory i can not push above 400+ for full stability i have tested manytimes and i dont know how is this possible that on a limited MONSTER card like LIGHTNING Z you get 60+/400+ :|

Yeah that seems a tad low for the memory, but in real world applications I doubt it makes much of a difference. I can push mine to +700, but I think it only makes a difference in synthetic benchmarks.

 

[VIGILANTBOY]

Yeah that seems a tad low for the memory, but in real world applications I doubt it makes much of a difference. I can push mine to +700, but I think it only makes a difference in synthetic benchmarks.

WOW 700+ is really great congratulations is it full stable and non artifacts at 700???
YES i was going with a titan xp but my friends told me to go with a kingpin or lightning card but with titan xp or a refrence card it would have way better chance to get a better or gold chip
these 4 benefits make a graphics card a KING of its competitors >>>>
1. LOWER VOLTAGE GPU & MEMORY CHIPSETS
2.LOWER TEMP GPU & MEMORY CHIPSETS (i dont mean the gpu cooler i mean the chipset it self ) <<<< some chips are hotter and some chips are not
3.THE WHOLE GPU COOLER & COOLING OPTIONS (better air cooler or water block)
4.THE GPU PHASE POWER DELIVERY <<<<< so u see that the power delivery is in 4th place so if you dont have a lower voltage chip and a lower temp chip and a good cooler for the unit then the power delivery is not going to do anything or have any benefits or it has so much low effect even if it is 16+3 20+3 ....................... or whatever BUT if you have the first 3 options thats the time when the power delivery comes to game and the magic happens then it will be a KING AND SUPER MONSTER
but my friends lightning z which we bought together at the same time the same shop hits 2126 on cores and his temps are under 55 :O he says in full load for 30 minutes or an hour the temps are around 40-52

 

[irate_primate]

WOW 700+ is really great congratulations is it full stable and non artifacts at 700???
YES i was going with a titan xp but my friends told me to go with a kingpin or lightning card but with titan xp or a refrence card it would have way better chance to get a better or gold chip
these 4 benefits make a graphics card a KING of its competitors >>>>
1. LOWER VOLTAGE GPU & MEMORY CHIPSETS
2.LOWER TEMP GPU & MEMORY CHIPSETS (i dont mean the gpu cooler i mean the chipset it self ) <<<< some chips are hotter and some chips are not
3.THE WHOLE GPU COOLER & COOLING OPTIONS (better air cooler or water block)
4.THE GPU PHASE POWER DELIVERY <<<<< so u see that the power delivery is in 4th place so if you dont have a lower voltage chip and a lower temp chip and a good cooler for the unit then the power delivery is not going to do anything or have any benefits or it has so much low effect even if it is 16+3 20+3 ....................... or whatever BUT if you have the first 3 options thats the time when the power delivery comes to game and the magic happens then it will be a KING AND SUPER MONSTER
but my friends lightning z which we bought together at the same time the same shop hits 2126 on cores and his temps are under 55 :O he says in full load for 30 minutes or an hour the temps are around 40-52

2100+ on core is real good, have your friend come by here and beat my score . I just tried for my max, and got +775 on memory with +77 on core. Honestly, it doesn't make much of a difference in gaming tho. Boosts my score again, am I allowed to post a new screenshot if I've beaten my old score?

6600K at 4.6
1080ti at +77/775

 

[VIGILANTBOY]

2100+ on core is real good, have your friend come by here and beat my score . I just tried for my max, and got +775 on memory with +77 on core. Honestly, it doesn't make much of a difference in gaming tho. Boosts my score again, am I allowed to post a new screenshot if I've beaten my old score?

6600K at 4.6
1080ti at +77/775

nice score
yeah 2126 is so muchh i will tell him but he is busy
Whats your 1080ti model ?

 

[irate_primate]

nice score
yeah 2126 is so muchh i will tell him but he is busy
Whats your 1080ti model ?

I've got the FTW3 Elite. It's a good card, though it is a little bit louder than the Strix that I had. I got the Strix first, but it had crazy coil whine so I had to send it back. Newegg didn't have any more of them so I got a refund and grabbed the FTW3 instead. It actually ran a little hot at first, but I opened it up and replaced the thermal paste with some good stuff I had and now the temps are really low.

 

[1Gpi2ZV6Jy]

***PRESS F12 for SCREENSHOT

okay, where is it saved?

 

[MrGenius]

***PRESS F12 for SCREENSHOT

okay, where is it saved?

https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/...chmark-1-0-scores.222154/page-12#post-3636095

 

[1Gpi2ZV6Jy]

https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/...chmark-1-0-scores.222154/page-12#post-3636095

Nope, I mean where is the screenshot saved on my box? I can't find it....

 

[MrGenius]

Nope, I mean where is the screenshot saved on my box? I can't find it....

On your "box"? I assume you mean on your "computer". It's in the Valley screenshots folder. Where's that? On Windows 7 you click Start(or open Windows Explorer from the icon on the taskbar), then click Computer. Then click Local Disk C: (or whatever drive letter corresponds to the drive your OS is on). Then click the Users folder. Then click the folder with your User Name. Then click the Valley folder. Then click the screenshots folder.

2. Then open File Windows Explorer > This PC Computer > C: (or whichever drive your OS is installed on) > Users > User Name > Valley > screenshots

 

[1Gpi2ZV6Jy]

On your "box"? I assume you mean on your "computer".....

Aha, thank you very much!
Okay, found it... how am I supposed to know when that isn't mentioned anywhere!?

Attached my lowish score - just to mention all default speeds

 

[MrGenius]

...how am I supposed to know when that isn't mentioned anywhere!?

Well...Google comes to mind. But I just added a hint in the first post to make it a little easier.

Attached my lowish score - just to mention all default speeds

That score's impossibly low for your card. Your score should be AT LEAST 3x higher. I don't know what you've got going on with your system, but it's killing your graphics performance.

 

[1Gpi2ZV6Jy]

Well...Google comes to mind. But I just added a hint in the first post to make it a little easier.

Brilliant idea!

That score's impossibly low for your card. Your score should be AT LEAST 3x higher. I don't know what you've got going on with your system, but it's killing your graphics performance.

My few games are all fine like mostly FC4 maxed out Ultra/8xaa full screen runs very smooth.
My Stormblood bench score (full screen) is 8374 which is not too bad. I think Valley is a little too old for new GPUs?!

I know there is a problem between Gigabyte's AGE and AMD's Wattman interfering each other (killing GPU mhz)

 

[MrGenius]

I think Valley is a little too old for new GPUs?!

It's not that. In fact that's not even a thing.

I know there is a problem between Gigabyte's AGE and AMD's Wattman interfering each other (killing GPU mhz)

That I don't know about. I can only go by what your screenshot shows. Which shows that's not happening during the benchmark. It could be wrong though.

Here's a review showing an RX 570 running at 1300(Gaming Mode)/1750 scoring 2650 in Valley @ 1080p Ultra 4x AA.
http://vishveshtech.blogspot.com/2017/06/asus-rog-strix-rx-570-oc-review.html

There's no way the extra 20MHz on the core and 4x AA vs. 8x AA should account for a ~2000 point gain over your card's score. The difference between 1280/1750 and 1300/1750 + 4x AA and 8x AA shouldn't be more than 100-200 points at best. Something is holding your card back BIG TIME! You should EASILY be scoring around 2000 or more, even with no overclocking. Check your AMD Radeon gaming settings and make sure they look like this.

 

[1Gpi2ZV6Jy]

Yep, right you are - now I am at 1921 and the offender was? supersampling!
another thx for this

Funny that the Enix benchmark scores are not affected by Crimson's AA Settings - scores stay the same ... multi/super sampling does not matter.

 

[VIGILANTBOY]

new update:
6850K @ 4.6 GHZ
1080 TI LIGHTNING Z @ 2037-1509

 

[VIGILANTBOY]

I've got the FTW3 Elite. It's a good card, though it is a little bit louder than the Strix that I had. I got the Strix first, but it had crazy coil whine so I had to send it back. Newegg didn't have any more of them so I got a refund and grabbed the FTW3 instead. It actually ran a little hot at first, but I opened it up and replaced the thermal paste with some good stuff I had and now the temps are really low.

YES fan noises and coil wines.... things that you never hear from a LIGHTNING Z

 

[irate_primate]

new update:

1080ti: +77/725
6700K: @ 4.8GHz

I don't think I'll be able to keep my lead over you with your CPU, so this will probably be my last attempt, but good scores! And I just noticed that I said I had a 6600K previously, which was a typo as I have a 6700K, oops.

 

[VIGILANTBOY]

new Score: 6850K@4.6GHz
1080 TI LIGHTNING Z@2037-1513

this can be my last attemp too or with some extra mhz on gddr5x memorys and cpu maybe if i can go....... you are better on the cpu side and thats a 4.8ghz mine on 4.6 also why didnt you push the memory to 775?push that 6700k to 5ghz ,its interesting to know what would be the scores with your card on my system and my card on yours

 

[zharth]

First real test. Haven't hit my threshold yet, but I figured it was worth a shot. I'm on air cooling and so far the temps are within range to keep boosting clock/memory. CPU is at 4.5GHz just for extra clarification, but sadly I'm pretty sure this is all it will handle unless I shove it passed 1.4v. I'd rather not do that though, this is supposed to last a long time.

 

[Melvis]

AMD FX 8350@ Stock + GTX 970 Sli @ Stock = 3116

 

[Cetinakpan]

My Zotac GTX1060 6G AMP! Edition With i3 6100

 

[The Pack]

The Pack i7 6850K @ 4.3 Ghz, Asus Strix GTX 1080ti O11G @ 2062/1475 = 6227

 

[purecain]

no one benchmarked a titan V yet??? lol i wish i had a spare 3 grand... damn it...!

 

[Hugis]

Just for giggles

 

[Vayra86]

Are we really still stuck on 1080p?

I strongly advocate we move to 1440p or even 4K for Valley. These scores have become kinda less relevant these days and are becoming less and less of a true GPU bench. Was like that over a year ago, and its become worse.

I think now is a good time to consider this because we are at the end of a GPU cycle, with Vega being released and 1080ti as well. It will be informative and nice to see the current score leaders perform at higher res with the same cards and create a playing field for the upcoming releases to score against. Especially because we have such a wide variety of VRAM setups these days - higher res will push that harder as well, those are more interesting results to look at.