- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 777 (0.18/day)
- Location
- Poland
| System Name | THU |
|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
| Motherboard | ASUS PRIME Z790-P D4 |
| Cooling | SilentiumPC Fortis 3 v2 + Arctic Cooling MX-2 |
| Memory | Crucial Ballistix 2x16 GB DDR4-3600 CL16 (dual rank) |
| Video Card(s) | MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ventus 3X OC 12 GB GDDR6X (2610/21000 @ 0.91 V) |
| Storage | Lexar NM790 2 TB + Corsair MP510 960 GB + PNY XLR8 CS3030 500 GB + Toshiba E300 3 TB |
| Display(s) | LG OLED C8 55" + ASUS VP229Q |
| Case | Fractal Design Define R6 |
| Audio Device(s) | Yamaha RX-V381 + Monitor Audio Bronze 6 + Bronze FX | FiiO E10K-TC + Sony MDR-7506 |
| Power Supply | Corsair RM650 |
| Mouse | Logitech M705 Marathon |
| Keyboard | Corsair K55 RGB PRO |
| Software | Windows 10 Home |
| Benchmark Scores | Benchmarks in 2024? |
I am always getting lower clocks than reviewers do, even though temperatures are good. Non-RT games usually stayed just above 1900 MHz at stock (while pretty much constantly drawing 350 W), sometimes the clock dropped below 1900.
I would actually not use this card if stock setting were the only option. The amount of heat is not acceptable to me. I got the card knowing I would be severely undervolting it, and it is still super fast with good efficiency.
I undervolted my 1080 and 2070 SUPER too, but the power draw was low enough that I got higher than stock performance. I will probably always undervolt from now on, but hopefully Lovelace will get similar results to Pascal and Turing.
I would actually not use this card if stock setting were the only option. The amount of heat is not acceptable to me. I got the card knowing I would be severely undervolting it, and it is still super fast with good efficiency.
I undervolted my 1080 and 2070 SUPER too, but the power draw was low enough that I got higher than stock performance. I will probably always undervolt from now on, but hopefully Lovelace will get similar results to Pascal and Turing.
