NVIDIA Announces PhysX SDK Support for Nintendo Wii Console

FordGT90Concept · Mar 20, 2009

Yup, XNA is likely to take over Windows and Xbox game developement. And yes, that is a bad thing.

AsRock · Mar 20, 2009

So if this can work on a wii it could for PC video cards from ATI ?.. If so why the hell no one hacked it already

... Not as it's worth all that much in the 1t place as havok does a great job already i think.

[I.R.A]_FBi · Mar 20, 2009

How does physx on the wii improve the gaming experience?

Methinks nvidia is grasping at straws.

Mussels · Mar 20, 2009

Steevo said:
The "universal" API will be DX11 and no doubt part of the new Xbox

And thats exactly why Nv is doing this - they know their physics engine on PC is about to get swamped, so they're moving it to platforms MS cant touch.

KainXS · Mar 20, 2009

[I.R.A]_FBi said:
How does physx on the wii improve the gaming experience?

Methinks nvidia is grasping at straws.

I second that :laugh:

ArmoredCavalry · Mar 20, 2009

[I.R.A]_FBi said:
How does physx on the wii improve the gaming experience?

Methinks nvidia is grasping at straws.

It doesn't... The average Wii owner has probably never heard of Physx, nor do they care if it is incorporated into their games. :laugh:

eidairaman1 · Mar 20, 2009

just like havoc engine.

craigo · Mar 20, 2009

The original Xbox had a nvidia gpu...all manufactures learnt from this and now purchase ati hardware for thier consoles...nobody wants inferior nv crap hardware anymore..so they try any push thier shitty SDK..i hope intel revive Havok and put the last nail in thier bullshit coffin...but well probably see the same Wii in a new bow renamed the "new" x Wii gtx soon.

GODAMN I HATE Nvidia

DrPepper · Mar 20, 2009

craigo said:
The original Xbox had a nvidia gpu...all manufactures learnt from this and now purchase ati hardware for thier consoles...nobody wants inferior nv crap hardware anymore..so they try any push thier shitty SDK..i hope intel revive Havok and put the last nail in thier bullshit coffin...but well probably see the same Wii in a new bow renamed the "new" x Wii gtx soon.

GODAMN I HATE Nvidia

Thats just asking for a flame war :shadedshu

Mussels · Mar 20, 2009

DrPepper said:
Thats just asking for a flame war :shadedshu

agreed... but so long as he doesnt aim his rage at members of the site, he aint really breaking any rules.

he'll chill out sooner or later.

DrPepper · Mar 20, 2009

Mussels said:
agreed... but so long as he doesnt aim his rage at members of the site, he aint really breaking any rules.

he'll chill out sooner or later.

Well its not that he's breaking any rules its that someone else will come on and have a go at him.

Mussels · Mar 20, 2009

DrPepper said:
Well its not that he's breaking any rules its that someone else will come on and have a go at him.

and if that happens, i'm a watchin.

craigo · Mar 20, 2009

No flamwar here people..BUT ati have spoken on nvidia sdk`s for thier hardware already...so id say Nvidia may well be rehashing a battle they already lost

Mussels · Mar 20, 2009

craigo said:
No flamwar here people..BUT ati have spoken on nvidia sdk`s for thier hardware already...so id say Nvidia may well be rehashing a battle they already lost

Nv are definately making money from it, so its hardly a loss. Moving from one platform to another simply means they're moving to the places profit are... i'd hardly call that losing.

I've used phsyx in games and thought it was great - the only problem was the lack of titles supporting it, which is why i went ATI this time around.

DarkMatter · Mar 20, 2009

[I.R.A]_FBi said:
How does physx on the wii improve the gaming experience?

Methinks nvidia is grasping at straws.

EDIT: I know you didn't mention Havok, but in the physics world there are mostly only two players and Havok is the bigger one. We DO need physics in the games as they improve gameplay a lot, so if we say we do not need PhysX it can only be because we have an alternative, and because of how thigs are that's Havok. You can change "Havok" name in the post by any other physics provider of your election anyway.

PhysX is exactly the same thing as Havok. Tell me how does Havok improve the gaming experience? PhysX is not only a hardware accelerated physics engine, it's a physics engine, period. It can run on various platforms, much more platforms than Havok does, so that's only a plus.

Regarding why do we need a 3rd party physics provider, the answer is easy. They can do a much better job than any developer could do. Because of the experience, because they can spend much more resources on it...

TBH it's annoying to hear "why do we need PhysX when we have Havok or any other physics provider" and all those kind of things. It's like saying why do we need id Tech 5, Cryengine 2 or Source, if we have UE3. They are just different engine providers and the more the better. In physics world there are primarily 2 players with almost all the "market" share: Havok and PhysX. It's stupid to prefer Havok over PhysX. I could understand it, partialy, if Havok was independent, but it belongs to Intel. There's no reason why anyone would prefer Havok over PhysX, unless he is biased, both API/engines can do exactly the same when running on the CPU, PhysX just allows for hardware support and brings a great improvement for those who want to enjoy it. I can't understand what's wrong with all of you against progress.

craigo · Mar 20, 2009

Mussels said:
Nv are definately making money from it, so its hardly a loss. Moving from one platform to another simply means they're moving to the places profit are... i'd hardly call that losing.

I've used phsyx in games and thought it was great - the only problem was the lack of titles supporting it, which is why i went ATI this time around.

That is all well and good if the SDK does not utalise AMD/ATI hardware, as that would be in breach of ATI`s inititial wishes.

edit: physx is a great thimg....id like to see havok with a greater market share

Mussels · Mar 20, 2009

craigo said:
That is all well and good if the SDK does not utalise AMD/ATI hardware, as that would be in breach of ATI`s inititial wishes.

Nvidia offer programs to nintendo. Nintendo apply it to the console.

ATI's wishes have nothing to do with this, it all comes down to the legal agreement between ATI and nintendo - and i hardly think ATI would get away with restricting what code can run on their GPU's when they were making their sales pitch for the Wii's GPU.

DarkMatter · Mar 20, 2009

Mussels said:
Nvidia offer programs to nintendo. Nintendo apply it to the console.

ATI's wishes have nothing to do with this, it all comes down to the legal agreement between ATI and nintendo - and i hardly think ATI would get away with restricting what code can run on their GPU's when they were making their sales pitch for the Wii's GPU.

The PhysX support in the Wii has nothing to do with GPU physics anyway. As I said above, PhysX is just another physics engine provider. In the Wii there's no doubt it will run on the CPU.

craigo · Mar 20, 2009

Mussels said:
Nvidia offer programs to nintendo. Nintendo apply it to the console.

ATI's wishes have nothing to do with this, it all comes down to the legal agreement between ATI and nintendo - and i hardly think ATI would get away with restricting what code can run on their GPU's when they were making their sales pitch for the Wii's GPU.

QFT...unfortunatley

DarkMatter · Mar 20, 2009

craigo said:
edit: physx is a great thimg....id like to see havok with a greater market share

BTW, any special reason why you would want Havok to have a greater market share? It already owns like 75% of the market anyway. Why you would want Intel to have almost a monopoly there is out of my comprehension.

MilkyWay · Mar 20, 2009

explain how this works coz the wii has an ati graphics chip? hollywood or something its called

can the wii even run physx? i mean some pcs take a hit and they have high end graphics

craigo · Mar 20, 2009

some of the eye candy in games will depend on more than the ATI graphics chip...the pc takes a performance hit because some of the graphics workload is shared with the cpu when physX is enebled on a non nvidia based system...what nvidia will likeley do in the case of the Wii is blow smoke up the arse of the games dcevelopers until every time you turn on your console you will be spamed with the nvidia logo

TheMailMan78 · Mar 20, 2009

craigo said:
id like to see havok with a greater market share

Havok is in just about everything. I hope you're not trolling.

FordGT90Concept · Mar 20, 2009

Mussels said:
Nv are definately making money from it, so its hardly a loss. Moving from one platform to another simply means they're moving to the places profit are... i'd hardly call that losing.

I've used phsyx in games and thought it was great - the only problem was the lack of titles supporting it, which is why i went ATI this time around.

Exactly. The majority of people can't be convinced in buying hardware specifically for physics processing. That basically means this whole NVIDIA/AMD physics race that is going on is them grasping at straws trying to find profit in their Ageia/Havok purchases. I think they are finding it very difficult to make money on them except in software licensing. Both bought it anticipating they would make a lot of money in terms of hardware. It just isn't happening.

DrPepper · Mar 20, 2009

I thought Intel bought havok ?

System Name	BY-2021
Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard	MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling	Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory	2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s)	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage	Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s)	Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case	Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s)	Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply	Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse	Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard	Tesoro Excalibur
Software	Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores	Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.

Processor	AMD 3900X \ AMD 7700X
Motherboard	ASRock AM4 X570 Pro 4 \ ASUS X670Xe TUF
Cooling	D15
Memory	Patriot 2x16GB PVS432G320C6K \ G.Skill Flare X5 F5-6000J3238F 2x16GB
Video Card(s)	eVga GTX1060 SSC \ XFX RX 6950XT RX-695XATBD9
Storage	Sammy 860, MX500, Sabrent Rocket 4 Sammy Evo 980 \ 1xSabrent Rocket 4+, Sammy 2x990 Pro
Display(s)	Samsung 1080P \ LG 43UN700
Case	Fractal Design Pop Air 2x140mm fans from Torrent \ Fractal Design Torrent 2 SilverStone FHP141x2
Audio Device(s)	Yamaha RX-V677 \ Yamaha CX-830+Yamaha MX-630 \Paradigm 7se MKII, Paradigm 5SE MK1 , Blue Yeti
Power Supply	Seasonic Prime TX-750 \ Corsair RM1000X Shift
Mouse	Steelseries Sensei wireless \ Steelseries Sensei wireless
Keyboard	Logitech K120 \ Wooting Two HE
Benchmark Scores	Meh benchmarks.

Processor	C2Q6600 @ 1.6 GHz
Motherboard	Anus PQ5
Cooling	ACFPro
Memory	GEiL2 x 1 GB PC2 6400
Video Card(s)	MSi 4830 (RIP)
Storage	Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320 GB Perpendicular Recording
Display(s)	Dell 17'
Case	El Cheepo
Audio Device(s)	7.1 Onboard
Power Supply	Corsair TX750
Software	MCE2K5

System Name	Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor	Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard	Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling	Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory	2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s)	Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage	2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s)	Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) \| Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) \| Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case	Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s)	Logitech G560 \| Corsair Void pro RGB \|Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply	Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse	Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard	Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD	Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software	Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores	Nyooom.

Processor	AMD Ryzen 9 9950x / AMD Epyc 7773x
Motherboard	Gigabyte B850 Gaming X/ ASROCK ROME
Cooling	Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4(Custom) / Custom Air
Memory	64GB Crucial Pro 6400 / 384GB
Video Card(s)	MSI RTX5070Ti(Temporary)/ 4X RTX3090
Storage	Adata SX8200 1TB NVME/WD Black 1TB NVME
Display(s)	Dell 27 Inch 165Hz
Case	Lian Li A3 Mini
Audio Device(s)	IFI Zen Dac/JDS Labs Atom+/SMSL Amp+Rivers Audio
Power Supply	Corsair RM850x
Mouse	Logitech G502 SE Hero
Keyboard	Corsair K70 RGB Mk.2
VR HMD	Samsung Odyssey Plus/ Quest 3
Software	Windows 11

System Name	PCGOD
Processor	AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard	Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling	Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory	16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s)	AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage	Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s)	NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case	AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s)	Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply	Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse	Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard	Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software	Windows 7 Pro 64

System Name	Rusky
Processor	Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard	Asus P6T
Cooling	Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory	12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s)	GTX470 1280MB
Storage	OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s)	Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case	Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply	Corsair 650 Watt
Software	Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores	3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg

Processor	Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard	Asus P5Q-E
Cooling	Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory	4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s)	GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage	74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s)	HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case	Antec p180
Audio Device(s)	Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply	700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software	Windows XP

System Name	TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor	RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard	Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling	MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory	ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s)	MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage	256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s)	LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case	Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s)	Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply	Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse	SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard	Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software	Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores	Benching is for bitches.

NVIDIA Announces PhysX SDK Support for Nintendo Wii Console

"I go fast!1!11!1!"

TPU addict

Freshwater Moderator

The Exiled Airman

The Doctor is in the house

Freshwater Moderator

The Doctor is in the house

Freshwater Moderator

Freshwater Moderator

New Member

Freshwater Moderator

New Member

New Member

Big Member

"I go fast!1!11!1!"

The Doctor is in the house