• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Announces Q3-FY24 Results; Earns 5 Times More Revenue from AI Chips than Gaming GPUs

Nvidia does not necessarily need to lose so much market value to fall below Intel and AMD, they just need to both grow while Nvidia continually weakens with the rise of competition and battles to make AI cheaper.
WTAF.

Neither Intel nor AMD have been able to compete effectively with NVIDIA in the ML space and there's zero indication they'll be able to anytime soon. So to claim that both of those companies will somehow be able to grow by a factor of more than three times (which is what would need to happen for them to surpass NVIDIA's market cap), isn't just laughable - it's so absurd that your post is literally hurting my brain. And that more than three times figure is also only relevant if NVIDIA themselves doesn't grow at all in the same period, which ain't gonna happen.

Now, I'd agree that NVIDIA is overvalued right now, and that there's going to be a correction eventually. But even if their stock drops to the ~$200 it was at the beginning of this year, they'd have a market cap of ~$488 billion which still massively exceeds AMD and Intel combined.

But go on, keep digging that hole.

I would really like to see gaming units sold not just the revenue part. Strictly for comparison. You may have the same number of units sold but if you jack up the price per unit, obviously your revenue will increase. I wonder, how these stats look like.
How exactly does it matter how many units were sold? Even if you sell only one unit at 100000000% profit, you still made a lot of money.

I owned a 2060 since the beginning.

Who do you think you are trolling.

Nvidia trolled me .

I sat through months of no use of features because f all used them, BeTA.


I also tested most iterations of dlss because they can't make one right first time and guess what none are at iterative one because we beta tested them found issues for Nvidia.

I'm sorry this insults your master but deal with it.
I'm sorry that I wasted my time arguing in good faith, when you evidently aren't capable of doing the same.
 
Last edited:
Okay folks.

I'll draw a line here. Please stop personal jabs, and please stop treating these threads as battlegrounds.
 
I owned a 2060 since the beginning.
I sat through months of no use of features because f all used them, BeTA.
Dozens of games always immediately have all the latest visual features right! Oh.... And how is a 2060 now? Leveraging years of building upon those foundations. I'd say pretty decently all things considered. It's amusing how common the fine wine argument is for another company picking up a few % overall over years, I'd say this is a pretty large improvement.
I also tested most iterations of dlss because they can't make one right first time
Tell me, does AMD get everything right first time? Intel? Thought so.
Im sorry this insults your master but deal with it.
This is so cringe it's hard to respond to. Why result to personal attacks, and for loving some ceo? Really? Be better. Some of your arguments have merit when you flesh them out, I can't deny you your experience, but man this crap is just laughable.
 
How exactly does it matter how many units were sold? Even if you sell only one unit at 100000000% profit, you still made a lot of money.
For me it does matter. I want to know how many units have been sold in comparison. It is very informative and shows a lot of different perspectives. You should try it some time.
 
I mean…water is wet? I know they still lead but the pricing scheme has definitely lowered sales and turned to people just staying on their 3 series or switching sides when value is better…
 
Back
Top