FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 26,259 (4.44/day)
- Location
- IA, USA
System Name | BY-2021 |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile) |
Motherboard | MSI B550 Gaming Plus |
Cooling | Scythe Mugen (rev 5) |
Memory | 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB |
Video Card(s) | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT |
Storage | Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM |
Display(s) | Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI) |
Case | Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay |
Audio Device(s) | Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+ |
Power Supply | Enermax Platimax 850w |
Mouse | Nixeus REVEL-X |
Keyboard | Tesoro Excalibur |
Software | Windows 10 Home 64-bit |
Benchmark Scores | Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare. |
They do. Intel 80286 (1982) was the first processor to feature a "chipset" (North and South Bridge). That didn't change until 2003 with the AMD Athlon64 FX-51. It didn't change for Intel until 2008 with the Intel Core i7 965. The "chipset" designed for the 80286 reigned supreme for over two decades. I think that could/should be considered "traditional."What AMD thinks is not the issue here. The issue is what constitutes a "traditional chipset" not a traditional Intel chipset. Intel do not own the definition.