• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880 Detailed

AsRock

TPU addict
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
19,107 (2.99/day)
Location
UK\USA
And all the people who bought a $3000 GPU go... :banghead:

NV stated they'd be doing a tick-tock setup like Intel. Kepler was a nice advancement but it was still the tock to Fermi. It isn't super different. Now we're going on the next tick, which is Maxwell.

Interested to see if NV gets it right again like they did with the 400s. The 750 is really mediocre and its a GM chip. Will be keeping a close eye and hopefully new employment to pay for it. Unless of course, AMD finally gets everything right.


AMD are getting it right even more so in the price department.. The over inflated prices cannot be blamed on them, well except maybe the 290x2.
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
1,458 (0.30/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E MPG Carbon Wifi
Cooling Custom loop, 2x360mm radiator,Lian Li UNI, EK XRes140,EK Velocity2
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill DDR5-6400 @ 6400MHz C32
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra OC Scanner core +750 mem
Storage MP600 Pro 2TB,960 EVO 1TB,XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB,Micron 1100 2TB,1.5TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Alienware AW3423DWF, Acer XB270HU
Case LianLi O11 Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) Logitech G-Pro X Wireless
Power Supply EVGA P3 1200W
Mouse Logitech G502X Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G512 Carbon w/ GX Brown
VR HMD HP Reverb G2 (V2)
Software Win 11
I really don't see the need for 8gb of Vram, nothing will ever use so much Vram, I use 2 x 670GTX FTW's(4gb Vram) games very rarely ever uses 4gb..... even on 4k screens you may only see 4.5gb used.....So I see a 4gb version releasing with some 8gb version released later on. As we saw with the 4gb version 670/680's they literally halted no performance increase vs. the 2gb versions. So I expect the same result with the 880's.

Because nothing ever used more than 8MB? Then 16MB? Then 32mb, then 64mb, then 128mb and on and on.

Can't hurt to have 8GB on board really. As resolutions increase and textures get bigger to support those resolutions video memory will be paramount.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,759 (1.40/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Because nothing ever used more than 8MB? Then 16MB? Then 32mb, then 64mb, then 128mb and on and on.

Can't hurt to have 8GB on board really. As resolutions increase and textures get bigger to support those resolutions video memory will be paramount.

Yeah, but remember back then you used to game on 640x480 resolution. Then VooDoo 2 came with SVGA support (800x600) and 12MB of VRAM and it was a blast. Quake 2 and Unreal anyone? ;)
 
Top