- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
- Messages
- 1,067 (0.78/day)
System Name | The Sparing-No-Expense Build |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 5600X |
Motherboard | Asus ROG Strix X570-E Gaming Wifi II |
Cooling | Noctua NH-U12S chromax.black |
Memory | 32GB: 2x16GB Patriot Viper Steel 3600MHz C18 |
Video Card(s) | NVIDIA RTX 3060Ti Founder's Edition |
Storage | 500GB 970 Evo Plus NVMe, 2TB Crucial MX500 |
Display(s) | AOC C24G1 144Hz 24" 1080p Monitor |
Case | Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO White |
Power Supply | Seasonic X-650 Gold PSU (SS-650KM3) |
Software | Windows 11 Home 64-bit |
I don't think 8 is doable on a 192-bit memory bus. The 3060 Ti has 8, but the bus for that is 256-bit.My thoughts were that 12 were too much and 6 is cutting it too close. 8 GB would have been better, I think.
If they go ahead and add the extra chips anyway, it'd be hard to utilize them.
Remember what happened with the GTX 970?
Where are these figures coming from? 249 seems too low for a 3060, considering it could have 80% of the performance of a 3060 Ti - that's speculation, but it could.249 and 299 respectively, at 349 it makes no sense to sell it as for 50 bucks(in theory) more you have 3060ti.
80% of the performance at 60% of the price? That's a 33% improvement in price/performance ratio; which is unlikely considering the 3060 Ti is currently at the top of the chart in the 30 series cards. At best I think it'll match the price/performance ratio at $349.