I agree with the suggestions made for a new "Not Recommended" badge (though this should be used only for truly bad products). The thing here is that 3070 Ti is a bit of an odd release - as a product, it doesn't shine but it doesn't stink either, my opinion is that it doesn't deserve to be "Not Recommended" but personally, I wouldn't be comfortable "recommending" it either, given that the competition has adequate products at similar price brackets that do not share its caveats and potential problems arising from the use of exotic memory technology.
Personally, I would have wrapped it up without giving it any award and mentioning that the cost to benefit ratio, in current market conditions, make it a fair (not amazing! but nowhere near bad, either!) product to own if purchased at MSRP, but not something that you should go out of your way, or part with a significant amount of cash to own.
The most interesting bit is that this is not entirely unlike its direct predecessor, the RTX 2080 Super. It was also the full xx104 chip with enhanced memory and that was actually a great product at its time. The 3070 Ti is just more of that - and at $600, it's not necessarily a bad thing. Just unremarkable in face of competition.
If the RTX 3070 Ti has earned such lukewarm reception among enthusiasts - it is solely because of AMD's highly competitive offerings and this is frankly amazing, a price war would have long sparked if the ongoing shortages due to supplies and mining weren't in effect.
When the last time NVIDIA truly had to sweat to keep up? I would argue that was when the Radeon HD 5000 series cards had full DirectX 11 support for almost a year in advance while NVIDIA still lingered with the DX10.0 GTX 200 series, and that's a good 12 years ago, now.