- Joined
- Jan 14, 2019
- Messages
- 15,925 (6.90/day)
- Location
- Midlands, UK
System Name | My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D @ 45 W TDP Eco Mode |
Motherboard | MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi |
Cooling | be quiet! Shadow Rock LP |
Memory | 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT |
Storage | 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda |
Display(s) | Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz |
Case | Corsair Crystal 280X |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones |
Power Supply | 750 W Seasonic Prime GX |
Mouse | Logitech MX Master 2S |
Keyboard | Logitech G413 SE |
Software | Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma |
Possible answers:
1 - to prove AMD marketing wrong when they say vram matters;
2 - to fool those who only see big numbers (including the price tag);
3 - to prove Jensen right on his adage "The more you buy, the more you save".
Any of these options would suggest some more hype from Nvidia, but it seems like they don't even want to sell it. Why release something with a big "don't buy this, it's shit" label on it? There's no logic here, or at least I can't see any.Definitely neither of these
Correct answer:
1 - to prove there are nvidia buyers (blind ones) who would spend any scalped super overcharged amount for whatever potato is offered by their "beloved" jensen - RTX 4060 Ti is nothing more than an RTX 4050 with a fake name and fake price tag..