NVIDIA GT300 ''Fermi'' Detailed

eidairaman1 · Sep 30, 2009

since they call this card reactor, i guess it will be as hot as a Nuclear reactor under meltdown conditions, aka GF 5800.

AddSub · Sep 30, 2009

W1zzard said:
you will pay 25$ for nothing? send it to funds@techpowerup.com

Situation is that bad, eh? May I recommend injecting ads into every post on TPU as a signature and banning people who use ad-blockers (like TechReport)

happita · Sep 30, 2009

Binge said:
Still not monopolizing the market, so your whining won't do anything. This is not the thread for GPU war conspiracy theories.

No monopolizing, correct, but they are involved in highly unethical business practices. And if this said rumor by Zone is true, forcing a company to not allow a game to utilize a certain DX level just because Nvidia doesn't support it is pretty f'ed up. I could understand if it was an Nvidia-only thing, but its freakin directx!! The consumer gets f'ed in the end. That is not the way to persuade customers to go and buy their product over competition. But I'm sure AMD/ATI does the same, but the light doesn't get shed on them because they're the "small guy". I WANT TRANSPARENCY ON BOTH SIDES DAMMIT!!!

eidairaman1 · Sep 30, 2009

AddSub said:
Situation is that bad, eh? May I recommend injecting ads into every post on TPU as a signature and banning people who use ad-blockers (like TechReport)

screw you dude :nutkick:

Benetanegia · Sep 30, 2009

ZoneDymo said:
Is it a rumour that Nvidia bought Ageia and left all Ageia card owners for dead?

They were not so many people. Around 10.000 PhysX PPU were sold. And sometimes a company has to do the best for the most. Spending as much to support 10.000 cards as you do to support 100++ million GPUs makes no sense at all, it's spending twice for nothing in the big squeme of things. I'm not saying that was good, it's a pity for those who bought the card, but for those who want PhysX acceleration, they can now have if for free, by just going Nvidia in their next purchase and all those who already had a Nvidia card got it for free.

Is it a rumour that Nvidia made sure that an ATI + Nvidia (for PhysX) configuration is no longer do-able?

It wasn't doable in every OS and did Ati want to share QA costs? Would Ati deliver Nvidia the newer ureleased cards, so that Nvidia could test compatibility and create the drivers before they were launched? Or they would have had to wait, with problematic drivers and taking all the blames for bad functioning setups??

Is it a rumour that AA does not work on ATI cards in Batman AA even though it is able to do so?

BS. And it has been discussed to death in other threads. Ati cards don't do that kind of AA, which was added exclusively for Nvidia, paid by Nvidia and QA'd by Nvidia. It even has the Nvidia AA label written all over it.

The only rumour is that Nvidia made Ubisoft remove DX10.1 support from AC because AC was running to awesome on it with of course ATI cards (Nvidia does not support DX10.1)

BS again. If Nvidia didn't want DX10.1 in that game,, it would have never have released with DX10.1 to begin with. HD3xxx had been released moths before the game launched, they already knew how they were going to perform, it just takes a travel to the local store and buying a damn card FFS! :laugh:

Atom_Anti · Sep 30, 2009

eidairaman1 said:
since they call this card reactor, i guess it will be as hot as a Nuclear reactor under meltdown conditions, aka GF 5800.

Yeah, yeah like Chornobyl reaktor did it in 1986 :wtf:

.
Anyway, there is still no release time, so Nvidia may won't be able to make it :rolleyes:

. Remember what happened with 3dfx, they were the biggest and most famous 3d vga maker, but they are could not come up enough soon with the Rampage. Maybe Reactor=Rampage :laugh:

.

newtekie1 · Sep 30, 2009

ZoneDymo said:
Rumours?
Is it a rumour that Nvidia bought Ageia and left all Ageia card owners for dead?
Is it a rumour that Nvidia made sure that an ATI + Nvidia (for PhysX) configuration is no longer do-able?
Is it a rumour that AA does not work on ATI cards in Batman AA even though it is able to do so?

The only rumour is that Nvidia made Ubisoft remove DX10.1 support from AC because AC was running to awesome on it with of course ATI cards (Nvidia does not support DX10.1)

Ageia was on the brink of bankrupcy when nVidia bought them. If Ageia went under, were would it have left the Ageia card owners then? They should all consider themselve lucky that nVidia bought Ageia and at least continued support for some time longer than what they would have gotten if Ageia was left to die.

Who cares if you can't use PhysX with an ATi card doing the graphics? ATi pretty much assured this when they denied nVidia to run PhysX natively on ATi hardware. Thats right, despite all your whining, you forget that initially, nVidia wanted to make PhysX run natively on ATi hardware, no nVidia hardware required. ATi was the one that shut the door on peaceful PhysX support, not nVidia.

And if you actually paid attention to the Batman issue, you would know a few things. 1.) Enabling AA on ATi cards not only doesn't actually work, it also breaks the game. 2.) nVidia paid for AA to be added in the game, the game engine does not natively support AA. If nVidia hadn't done so, AA would not have been included in the game, so ATi is no worse off. There is no reason that nVidia should allow ATi to use a feature that nVidia spent the money to develope and include in the game. So, it is a false rumor that nVidia paid to have a feature disabled for ATi card. The truth is that they paid to have the feature added for their cards. There is a big difference between those two.

aetneerg · Sep 30, 2009

I predict GTX380 card will cost between $549.99-$579.99.

legends84 · Sep 30, 2009

oh well.. stick with my recent gpu first..this thing will burn my money :ohwell:

KainXS · Sep 30, 2009

so if its 384bit of GDDR5, then we are looking at a card with a max of 48 rops and 512 shaders

at least nvidia is being innovative, I think this card is going to be a monster when it comes out.

erocker · Sep 30, 2009

newtekie1 said:
Ageia was on the brink of bankrupcy when nVidia bought them. If Ageia went under, were would it have left the Ageia card owners then? They should all consider themselve lucky that nVidia bought Ageia and at least continued support for some time longer than what they would have gotten if Ageia was left to die.

Who cares if you can't use PhysX with an ATi card doing the graphics? ATi pretty much assured this when they denied nVidia to run PhysX natively on ATi hardware. Thats right, despite all your whining, you forget that initially, nVidia wanted to make PhysX run natively on ATi hardware, no nVidia hardware required. ATi was the one that shut the door on peaceful PhysX support, not nVidia.

And if you actually paid attention to the Batman issue, you would know a few things. 1.) Enabling AA on ATi cards not only doesn't actually work, it also breaks the game. 2.) nVidia paid for AA to be added in the game, the game engine does not natively support AA. If nVidia hadn't done so, AA would not have been included in the game, so ATi is no worse off. There is no reason that nVidia should allow ATi to use a feature that nVidia spent the money to develope and include in the game. So, it is a false rumor that nVidia paid to have a feature disabled for ATi card. The truth is that they paid to have the feature added for their cards. There is a big difference between those two.

Good point with Ageia, but Ageia isn't the only company. Many of us are still burned from 3dFX. Now that sucked.

I can enable AA in CCC for the Batman demo. It works, performance sucks but it works. There is no way a game developer should be taking kickbacks for exclusivity in games. It alienates many of their customers. There is also no way you know for sure that they couldn't of added AA for all graphics cards with Batman. Honestly, what? Are game developers going to start charging graphics card companies more money to include the color blue in their games? Ridiculous.

Fact of the matter is though, I'm sure if we had a poll, both Nvidia and ATi owners would agree that features should be included for both cards. Continuing down this road will do nothing but make certain features that should already be in the game, exclusive to a particular brand more and more. It needs to stop, it's bad business and most importantly bad for the consumer, limiting our choices.

Benetanegia · Sep 30, 2009

Benetanegia said:
AFAIK that means that you can just #include C for CUDA and work with c++ like you would do with any other library and same for fortran. That's very good for some programers indeed, but only works on Nvidia hardware.

I said that, but after reading information in other places thatmight be innacurate. They're saying that it can run C/C++ and Fortran code directly. That means there's no need to deal with CUDA, OpenCL or DX11 compute shaders, because you could just program something in Visual Studio and the code would just work. I don't know if that's true but it would be amazing.

Easy Rhino · Sep 30, 2009

given nvidias past this will most likely be $100 dollars more than ATis flagship. obviously to the sane person its performance would have to justify the cost. this time around though nvidia is coming out after ati so they may indeed have to keep their prices competitive.

Benetanegia · Sep 30, 2009

erocker said:
Good point with Ageia, but Ageia isn't the only company. Many of us are still burned from 3dFX. Now that sucked.

I can enable AA in CCC for the Batman demo. It works, performance sucks but it works. There is no way a game developer should be taking kickbacks for exclusivity in games. It alienates many of their customers. There is also no way you know for sure that they couldn't of added AA for all graphics cards with Batman. Honestly, what? Are game developers going to start charging graphics card companies more money to include the color blue in their games? Ridiculous.

Fact of the matter is though, I'm sure if we had a poll, both Nvidia and ATi owners would agree that features should be included for both cards. Continuing down this road will do nothing but make certain features that should already be in the game, exclusive to a particular brand more and more. It needs to stop, it's bad business and most importantly bad for the consumer, limiting our choices.

Stop the bitching allready. Fact is that 10+ games have been released using UE3 and none of them had in game AA. If you wanted AA, you had to enable it in the control panel, had you Ati or had you Nvidia. With this game Nvidia asked the developer to add AA and helped developing and Quality Assurancing the feature. AMD didn't even contact the developer so should they obtain something they didn't pay for? Should the developers risk their reputation by releasing something that has not had any QA*? Or should Nvidia pay so that the developer did QA in AMD's cards? AMD is not helping developers on purpose, but they are expecting to get all the benefits, is that any moral? Not in my book. Only reason that GPUs are sold is because of games, so helping the ones that are helping you is the natural thing to do.

Regarding your last paragraph, I would say yes, but only if both GPU developers were helping to include the features.

* The feature breaks the game, so instead of the crap about Nvidia disabling te feature, we would be hearing crap about Nvidia paying for the game crashing with AMD cards. This crap will never end.

eidairaman1 · Sep 30, 2009

all I can say is its hurting their sales due to the Game having the TWIMTBP badge on it not getting the expected sales from AMD users. With that badge they getpaid a little here and there. With business practices like this it makes me glad I switched to ATI back in 2002

yogurt_21 · Sep 30, 2009

happita said:
And I was wondering why I was seeing L1 and L2 caches on an upcoming video card. I thought I was going crazy hahaha.

This will be VERY interesting, if the price is right, I may skip the 5k and go GT300

yeah I though that was odd as well, I'm very curious to see the performance of these bad boys. the way things are going it will be while before I have the cash for a new card anyway so i might as weel wait and see what both sides have to offer.

eidairaman1 said:
all I can say is its hurting their sales due to the Game having the TWIMTBP badge on it not getting the expected sales from AMD users. With that badge they get paid a little here and there.

funny even when I had my 2900xt I barely noticed the twimtbp badge either on the case or in the loading of the game. I've yet to find a game that will not work on either sides cards and i never buy a game because it works better on one than another. I hope most of you don't either. I buy games that i like for storyline, graphics, gameplay, and replayability. other reasons make no sense to me.

aj28 · Sep 30, 2009

Prices will be competitive because they have to be, but nVidia is going to lose big due to the cost of producing this behemoth. And what is their plan for scaling? All of this talk about a high-end chip while they're completely mum about everything else. Are they going to re-use G92 again, or just elect not to compete?

Once Juniper comes out (still scheduled Q4 2009), expect nVidia to shed a few more of their previously-exclusive AIB partners...

erocker · Sep 30, 2009

Benetanegia said:
Stop the bitching allready. Fact is that 10+ games have been released using UE3 and none of them had in game AA. If you wanted AA, you had to enable it in the control panel, had you Ati or had you Nvidia. With this game Nvidia asked the developer to add AA and helped developing and Quality Assurancing the feature. AMD didn't even contact the developer so should they obtain something they didn't pay for? Should the developers risk their reputation by releasing something that has not had any QA*? Or should Nvidia pay so that the developer did QA in AMD's cards? AMD is not helping developers on purpose, but they are expecting to get all the benefits, is that any moral? Not in my book. Only reason that GPUs are sold is because of games, so helping the ones that are helping you is the natural thing to do.

Regarding your last paragraph, I would say yes, but only if both GPU developers were helping to include the features.

* The feature breaks the game, so instead of the crap about Nvidia disabling te feature, we would be hearing crap about Nvidia paying for the game crashing with AMD cards. This crap will never end.

I'm not bitching, you're bitching.

(You are also walking thin ice with that comment. I am free to express my views on this forum like anyone else.) I'm stating how I see it. Tell me all mighty one, do you work for Nvidia? Do you know if Nvidia is approachng the developers or is it the other way around? Is Nvidia paying the developers to add features to the games for their cards, or are they throwing developers cash to keep features exclusive to their cards. Unless you work in one of their back rooms, you have no idea.

*Ugh, I'm sounding like a conspiracy theorist. I hate conspiracy theorists. I'll shut up and just not play this game. :toast:

VanguardGX · Sep 30, 2009

aj28 said:
Prices will be competitive because they have to be, but nVidia is going to lose big due to the cost of producing this behemoth. And what is their plan for scaling? All of this talk about a high-end chip while they're completely mum about everything else. Are they going to re-use G92 again, or just elect not to compete?

Once Juniper comes out (still scheduled Q4 2009), expect nVidia to shed a few more of their previously-exclusive AIB partners...

NV is just gonna recycle old G92/GT200 Parts to fill that gap!!!

DaJMasta · Sep 30, 2009

Native fortran support!!!!!!

YESSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:ohwell:

Benetanegia · Sep 30, 2009

erocker said:
I'm not bitching, you're bitching. I'm stating how I see it. Tell me all mighty one, do you work for Nvidia? Do you know if Nvidia is approachng the developers or is it the other way around? Is Nvidia paying the developers to add features to the games for their cards, or are they throwing developers cash to keep features exclusive to their cards. Unless you work in one of their back rooms, you have no idea.

Do you know anything of presumption of innocence? When there's no proofs of guilty the natural reaction is to presume innocence. That's what a honest non biased person thinks. And that's what any legal system is based on.

You have as much proof of that happening as I do of it not happening. have you any proof except that it runs better on one than the other? So you have the reason and I don't, because? Enlighten me.

I know Nvidia is playing fair, because that's what the developers say. When docens of Developers say that Nvidia is approaching them to help them develop, optimize and test their games, my natural reaction is to believe them, because I don't presume that all the people lie. I don't presume that all of them take money underhand. But most importantly I know that at least one out of the 100 that form a game development team, out of the 100 developers that have developed under TWIMTBP, one at least, would have said something already if it was happening something shaddy.

I've been part of an small developer that did small java games, and I know how much it costs to optimize and make even a simple game bug free, so it doesn't surprise me a bit that games that have been optimized on one card runs better than in the one that hasn't*. That's the first thing that make people jump about TWIMTBP, so being that's what they think and have been claiming bad behavior out of that, it doesn't surprice me.

*It also happened that one game run flawlessly on one cellphone and crashed on others, while both should be able to run the same java code.

Mistral · Sep 30, 2009

Benetanegia said:
...They're saying that it can run C/C++ and Fortran code directly. That means there's no need to deal with CUDA, OpenCL or DX11 compute shaders, because you could just program something in Visual Studio and the code would just work. I don't know if that's true but it would be amazing.

As amazingly awesome that is, save for some very rare cases I'm quite questioning the utility of this. Besides raising the transistor count (almost wrote trannies there...), what use is that to the gaming population? And I doubt even pros would have much reason to jump on it.

L1 and L2 caches sounds like fun though...

DaedalusHelios · Sep 30, 2009

erocker said:
I'm not bitching, you're bitching. (You are also walking thin ice with that comment. I am free to express my views on this forum like anyone else.) I'm stating how I see it. Tell me all mighty one, do you work for Nvidia? Do you know if Nvidia is approachng the developers or is it the other way around? Is Nvidia paying the developers to add features to the games for their cards, or are they throwing developers cash to keep features exclusive to their cards. Unless you work in one of their back rooms, you have no idea.

*Ugh, I'm sounding like a conspiracy theorist. I hate conspiracy theorists. I'll shut up and just not play this game.

Erocker, I think his "bitching" response was directed at the portion of the community as a whole. I know you feel a little burned by the trouble you had with Physx configurations. It really did take extra time to program selective AA into the game. I think we all agree on that right? With that being said, we know that Nvidia helped fund the creation of the game from the start. So if the developer says,"Nvidia, that money helped so much in making our production budget that we will engineer a special selective AA for your hardware line". Is that morally wrong? Do you say Nvidia cannot pay for extra engineering to improve the experience of their own end users? If Nvidia said they would send ham sandwiches to everybody that bought Nvidia cards in the last year would you say that its not fair unless they send them to ATi users too?

What it comes down to is it was a game without selective AA. Nvidia helps develop the game and gets a special feature for their hardware line when running the game. Where is the moral dillemma?

Benetanegia · Sep 30, 2009

Mistral said:
As amazingly awesome that is, save for some very rare cases I'm quite questioning the utility of this. Besides raising the transistor count (almost wrote trannies there...), what use is that to the gaming population? And I doubt even pros would have much reason to jump on it.

L1 and L2 caches sounds like fun though...

Who says that in 2009 a GPU is a gaming only device? It has never been anyway. Nvidia has GeForce, Tesla and Cuadro brands and all of them are based on the same chip. As long as the graphics card is being competitive do you care about anything else? You shouldn't. And appart from this the ability to run C++ code can help in all kinds of applications. You have never encoded a video? Wouldn't you like to be able to do it 20x faster?

Pros on the other hand have 1000s and every reason to jump into something like this.

Tatty_Two · Sep 30, 2009

qubit said:
Shame that bus isn't a full 512 bits wide. They've increased the bandwidth with GDDR5, yet taken some back with a narrower bus. Also, 384 bits has the consequence that the amount of RAM is that odd size like on the 8800 GTX, when it would really be best at a power of two.

GDDR5 effectively doubles the bandwidth in any case (unlike 3), there is no card on the planet that will be remoteley hampered by effectively a 768MBits throughput, really, with GDDR5 there is absolutely no need to go to the additional expense.

System Name	PCGOD
Processor	AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard	Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling	Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory	16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s)	AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage	Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s)	NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case	AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s)	Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply	Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse	Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard	Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software	Windows 7 Pro 64

System Name	[Primary Workstation]
Processor	Intel Core i7-920 Bloomfield @ 3.8GHz/4.55GHz [24-7/Bench]
Motherboard	EVGA X58 E758-A1 [Tweaked right!]
Cooling	Cooler Master V8 [stock fan + two 133CFM ULTRA KAZE fans]
Memory	12GB [Kingston HyperX]
Video Card(s)	constantly upgrading/downgrading [prefer nVidia]
Storage	constantly upgrading/downgrading [prefer Hitachi/Samsung]
Display(s)	Triple LCD [40 inch primary + 32 & 28 inch auxiliary displays]
Case	Cooler Master Cosmos 1000 [Mesh Mod, CFM Overload]
Audio Device(s)	ASUS Xonar D1 + onboard Realtek ALC889A [Logitech Z-5300 Spk., Niko 650-HP 5.1 Hp., X-Bass Hp.]
Power Supply	Corsair TX950W [aka Reactor]
Software	This and that... [All software 100% legit and paid for, 0% pirated]
Benchmark Scores	Ridiculously good scores!!!

Processor	i5-7600k
Motherboard	ASRock Z170 Pro4
Cooling	CM Hyper 212 EVO w/ AC MX-4
Memory	2x8GB DDR4 2400 Corsair LPX Vengeance 15-15-15-36
Video Card(s)	MSI Twin Frozr 1070ti
Storage	240GB Corsair Force GT
Display(s)	23' Dell AW2310
Case	Corsair 550D
Power Supply	Seasonic SS-760XP2 Platinum
Software	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit

System Name	PCGOD
Processor	AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard	Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling	Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory	16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s)	AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage	Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s)	NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case	AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s)	Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply	Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse	Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard	Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software	Windows 7 Pro 64

System Name	3dfx High End PC
Processor	Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz@3.7GHz
Motherboard	Abit SA7
Cooling	AC Freezer 4
Memory	512MB Patriot DDR600 TCCD
Video Card(s)	3dfx Voodoo 5 5500 AGP 193/193MHz
Storage	80GB 7200RPM Pata
Display(s)	19" LG Wide TFT-LCD
Case	Cooler Master
Audio Device(s)	integrated
Power Supply	400W
Software	Windows Millenium Edition
Benchmark Scores	3DMark2000: 7100 3DMark2001: 4100

Processor	Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard	AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling	Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory	32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s)	RTX 2070 Super
Storage	500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s)	Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case	Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s)	Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply	eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software	Windows 10 Pro x64

System Name	KXa DrakeN
Processor	Intel Core i7 3770k
Motherboard	Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z Z68 1155
Cooling	NZXT Kraken X60
Memory	8GB Ripjaw-X Red 1866mhz
Video Card(s)	2X ASUS GTX780 DCUII OC
Storage	Crucial M4 128gb+Intel 320 160gb Gen3+2TB BLack WD+1TB Black WD
Display(s)	DELL S2740L 27'' LED LCD
Case	NZXT Phantom 410
Audio Device(s)	ASUS XONAR D2X
Power Supply	Corsair HX1050wt
Software	Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64bit

Processor	AMD Ryzen 9 9950x / AMD Epyc 7773x
Motherboard	Gigabyte B850 Gaming X/ ASROCK ROME
Cooling	Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4(Custom) / Custom Air
Memory	64GB Crucial Pro 6400 / 384GB
Video Card(s)	MSI RTX5070Ti(Temporary)/ 4X RTX3090
Storage	Adata SX8200 1TB NVME/WD Black 1TB NVME
Display(s)	Dell 27 Inch 165Hz
Case	Lian Li A3 Mini
Audio Device(s)	IFI Zen Dac/JDS Labs Atom+/SMSL Amp+Rivers Audio
Power Supply	Corsair RM850x
Mouse	Logitech G502 SE Hero
Keyboard	Corsair K70 RGB Mk.2
VR HMD	Samsung Odyssey Plus/ Quest 3
Software	Windows 11

Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard	ASUS TUF x670e-Plus Wifi
Cooling	EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory	64GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s)	Asus RTX 4090
Storage	WD/Samsung m.2's
Display(s)	LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case	Fractal Design North
Audio Device(s)	Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Amp, Adam Audio T5V's, Hifiman Sundara's.
Power Supply	FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse	Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard	Epomaker 84 key
Software	Windows 11 Pro

System Name	Desktop
Processor	i5 13600KF
Motherboard	AsRock B760M Steel Legend Wifi
Cooling	Noctua NH-U9S
Memory	4x 16 Gb Gskill S5 DDR5 @6000
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte Gaming OC 6750 XT 12GB
Storage	WD_BLACK 4TB SN850x
Display(s)	Gigabye M32U
Case	Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s)	On Board
Power Supply	EVGA Supernova 650 P2
Mouse	MX Master 3s
Keyboard	Logitech G915 Wireless Clicky
Software	Fedora KDE Spin

System Name	Thought I'd be done with this by now
Processor	i7 11700k 8/16
Motherboard	MSI Z590 Pro Wifi
Cooling	Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4, 9x aigo AR12
Memory	32GB GSkill TridentZ Neo DDR4-4000 CL18-22-22-42
Video Card(s)	MSI Ventus 2x Geforce RTX 3070
Storage	1TB MX300 M.2 OS + Games, + cloud mostly
Display(s)	Samsung 40" 4k (TV)
Case	Lian Li PC-011 Dynamic EVO Black
Audio Device(s)	onboard HD -> Yamaha 5.1
Power Supply	EVGA 850 GQ
Mouse	Logitech wireless
Keyboard	same
VR HMD	nah
Software	Windows 10
Benchmark Scores	no one cares anymore lols

Processor	AMD Ryzen 3 1200 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard	MSI B350M Gaming PRO
Cooling	2x Dynamic X2 GP-12
Memory	2x4GB GeIL EVO POTENZA AMD PC4-17000
Video Card(s)	GIGABYTE Radeon RX 560 2GB
Storage	Samsung SSD 840 Series (250GB)
Display(s)	Asus VP239H-P (23")
Case	Fractal Design Define Mini C TG
Audio Device(s)	ASUS Xonar U3
Power Supply	CORSAIR CX450
Mouse	Logitech G500
Keyboard	Corsair Vengeance K65
Software	Windows 10 Pro (x64)

System Name	EDGE IIIv2
Processor	Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3Ghz
Motherboard	ASUS P5E-VM HDMI
Cooling	Stock intel Cooler
Memory	G.Skill 2GB DDR2 800Mhz OCZ Technology 2GB DDR2 800Mhz@ 5.5.5.15
Video Card(s)	MSi Radeon HD 4770 (Stock)
Storage	500GB Seagate Barracuda & 160GB WD Caviar
Display(s)	BenQ FP241WZ 24"
Case	Thermaltake LANbox
Audio Device(s)	ASUS Xonar D2
Power Supply	Zalman ZM600-HP Heatpipe cooled
Benchmark Scores	3D Mark Vantage:P3366 3D Mark 06:8112

Processor	Core i7 4770K
Motherboard	Asrock Z87E-ITX
Cooling	Stock
Memory	16GB Gskill 2133MHz DDR3
Video Card(s)	PNY GeForce GTX 670 2GB
Storage	256GB Corsair M4, 240GB Samsung 840
Display(s)	27" 1440p Achevia Shimian
Case	Fractal Node 304
Audio Device(s)	Audioquest Dragonfly USB DAC
Power Supply	Corsair Builder 600W
Software	Windows 7 Pro x64

System Name	Aryzen / Sairikiki / Tesseract
Processor	5800x / i7 920@3.73 / 5800x
Motherboard	Steel Legend B450M / GB EX58-UDP4 / Steel Legend B550M
Cooling	Mugen 5 / Pure Rock / Glacier One 240
Memory	Corsair Something 16 / Corsair Something 12 / G.Skill 32
Video Card(s)	AMD 6800XT / AMD 6750XT / Sapphire 7800XT
Storage	Way too many drives...
Display(s)	LG 332GP850-B / Sony w800b / Sony X90J
Case	EVOLV X / Carbide 540 / Carbide 280x
Audio Device(s)	SB ZxR + GSP 500 / board / Denon X1700h + ELAC Uni-Fi 2 + Senn 6XX
Power Supply	Seasonic PRIME GX-750 / Corsair HX750 / Seasonic Focus PX-650
Mouse	G700 / none / G602
Keyboard	G910
Software	w11 64
Benchmark Scores	I don't play benchmarks...

Processor	Intel Core i9 11900KF @ -.080mV PL max @220w
Motherboard	MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK
Cooling	DeepCool LS520SE Liquid + 3 Phanteks 140mm case fans
Memory	32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel Bdie @ 3600Mhz CL14 1.45v Gear 1
Video Card(s)	Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC + 8% PL
Storage	WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS)
Display(s)	AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS
Case	Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal
Audio Device(s)	Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1
Power Supply	Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular
Software	Win 11 Home x64

System Name	Cosmos F1000
Processor	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard	MSI PRO B650-S WIFI AM5
Cooling	Corsair H100x, Panaflo's on case
Memory	G.Skill DDR5 Trident 64GB (32GBx2)
Video Card(s)	MSI Gaming Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB GDDR6
Storage	4TB Firecuda M.2 2280
Display(s)	32" OLED 4k 240Hz ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCD
Case	CM Cosmos 1000
Audio Device(s)	logitech 5.1 system (midrange quality)
Power Supply	CORSAIR RM1000e 1000watt
Mouse	G400s Logitech, white Razor Mamba
Keyboard	K65 RGB Corsair Tenkeyless Cherry Red MX
VR HMD	Steam Valve Index
Software	Win10 Pro, Win11

NVIDIA GT300 ''Fermi'' Detailed

The Exiled Airman

The Exiled Airman

New Member

New Member

Semi-Retired Folder

New Member

*

New Member

Linux Advocate

New Member

The Exiled Airman

*

New Member

New Member

Gone Fishing