I still don't understand why (or even how) people don't understand the concept of cooler reviews.
When testing values/numbers, you would want a heat source. The higher the heat source, the more evident the differences in cooling are. At what point anyone can say that a 1150/1155 socket chip will produce higher thermal than 2011 is absolutely absurd (They use more costly solder under the IHS and DO NOT include a stock cooler for a reason). I also know that crazy's test bed uses an exceptionally high thermal chip. The idea isn't to show how high a chip can overclock with a cooler, its how low a temp can be at equivalent overclocking.
When testing compatibility, then the platforms are more important. The only reason I can see why Drdeathx might be "complaining" is because not all mounting brackets are equivalent. In that respect, yes reviews may swing in results if the mounting equipment for 2011, 1150, and 1155 offer different results, which would be truly unfortunate for anyone who isn't specifically on the exact test bed that the reviewer is using (let alone using AMD...WHOA NOW!) since the motherboard, case, chip, and other random factors could all play into the bracketology of coolers.