• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Optane 1600X 118GB - Lots of CDM benching and some thoughts

Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Messages
2,298 (1.16/day)
Location
Olympia, WA
System Name Sleepy Painter
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus TuF Gaming X570-PLUS/WIFI
Cooling FSP Windale 6 - Passive
Memory 2x16GB F4-3600C16-16GVKC @ 16-19-21-36-58-1T
Video Card(s) MSI RX580 8GB
Storage 2x Samsung PM963 960GB nVME RAID0, Crucial BX500 1TB SATA, WD Blue 3D 2TB SATA
Display(s) Microboard 32" Curved 1080P 144hz VA w/ Freesync
Case NZXT Gamma Classic Black
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1
Power Supply Rosewill 1KW on 240V@60hz
Mouse Logitech MX518 Legend
Keyboard Red Dragon K552
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 2019 LTSC 1809 17763.1757
Unfortunately Intel NAND and Optane drives become read-only once they reach 100-105% of their rated TBW.

So trying to speed run the 1300TBW rating isn’t recommended. Even if the media itself can last far beyond that rating.
o_O
Any way to 'spoof' the recorded writes? (Like those 'generic Chinese' NVMEs do?)
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2024
Messages
32 (0.16/day)
System Name Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Laptop
Processor Intel i5-13420H
Motherboard Lenovo LNVNB161216
Memory 2x8GB DDR5 5200MHz (mismatched)
Video Card(s) RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Storage Intel Optane P1600X 118GB + Samsung PM9A1 1TB
Display(s) 1920x1080 144Hz
Mouse Logitech G203
I found out today that I'm not even using the "optimal" configuration of the drive, because I have the sector size set to 512B which is default rather than the reported "best" setting of 4096B/4KiB.

Unfortunately changing that setting would be rather involved as doing so deletes all data on the drive. I probably won't go to the trouble until I have a new system.

I'll console myself with the thought that it "probably" doesn't make much of a difference in performance, in benchmarks let alone in real-world experience.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2024
Messages
89 (0.41/day)
Location
Canucksland
System Name Main / HTPC / Server
Processor i5 14600K / Ryzen 5 2400G / i7 7700K
Motherboard Z790 PRO RS / B450M Mortar / Z270 IX Code
Cooling AS500 PLUS WH / Wraith Stealth / NH-D15
Memory 32GB 6000 C30 / 8GB 2666 C16 / 32GB 3000 C15
Video Card(s) GTX 780 (temporary) / iGPU / iGPU
Storage (OS) 1600X 118GB / V200 120GB / 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) Predator XB271HU / KDL-55W950B / VH238H
Case Eclipse P400S / LC13-BU / Define R5
Audio Device(s) Xonar U7 (HD 598) / Xfi Titanium (Azur 851A)
Power Supply Prime Titanium 750W / M12II EVO 620W / AXi 860W
I found out today that I'm not even using the "optimal" configuration of the drive, because I have the sector size set to 512B which is default rather than the reported "best" setting of 4096B/4KiB.

Unfortunately changing that setting would be rather involved as doing so deletes all data on the drive. I probably won't go to the trouble until I have a new system.

I'll console myself with the thought that it "probably" doesn't make much of a difference in performance, in benchmarks let alone in real-world experience.
Best setting for Optane specifically or ssd generally? I seem to remember regular nvme drives cannot do lower than 4KiB, whereas Optane can. I’d be curious to see real world difference indeed if any but cannot really make an educated guess about that. I’m thinking the default sector size is attributed by operational capabilities but might not be optimal in Windows.

I do remember back in the hdd/win 7 era that it was optimal to force a 4KiB sector when partitioning, the theory long lost to me since except that it was supposed to be optimal performance indeed.
 
Joined
Jul 30, 2019
Messages
3,024 (1.61/day)
System Name Not a thread ripper but pretty good.
Processor Ryzen 9 5950x
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi (revision 1.06, BIOS/UEFI version P5.50)
Cooling EK-Quantum Velocity2, EK-Quantum Reflection PC-O11, D5 PWM, EK-CoolStream PE 360, XSPC TX360
Memory Micron DDR4-3200 ECC Unbuffered Memory (4 sticks, 128GB, 18ASF4G72AZ-3G2F1) + JONSBO NF-1
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 5700 & EK-Quantum Vector Radeon RX 5700 +XT & Backplate
Storage Samsung 2TB & 4TB 980 PRO, 2TB 970 EVO Plus, 2 x Optane 905p 1.5TB (striped), AMD Radeon RAMDisk
Display(s) 2 x 4K LG 27UL600-W (and HUANUO Dual Monitor Mount)
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic Black (original model)
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
Mouse Logitech M575
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB MK.2
Software Windows 10 Professional (64bit)
Benchmark Scores Typical for non-overclocked CPU.
i can already tell you whats going to happen: random performance (the metric you'd care for) will actually get worse. don't do raid0 w/ ssds. remember raid0 = 0brain
What about soft-raid like from Windows Disk Management? My understanding was at the very least there would be some OS/CPU overhead but the OS would access the drives at their native speed probably better than some cheap consumer firmware raid.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
17 (0.01/day)
What about soft-raid like from Windows Disk Management? My understanding was at the very least there would be some OS/CPU overhead but the OS would access the drives at their native speed probably better than some cheap consumer firmware raid.
Your random access speed/latency will be orders of magnitude slower, even with VROC backed mdraid on Linux (semi-hardware).

Best setting for Optane specifically or ssd generally? I seem to remember regular nvme drives cannot do lower than 4KiB, whereas Optane can. I’d be curious to see real world difference indeed if any but cannot really make an educated guess about that. I’m thinking the default sector size is attributed by operational capabilities but might not be optimal in Windows.

I do remember back in the hdd/win 7 era that it was optimal to force a 4KiB sector when partitioning, the theory long lost to me since except that it was supposed to be optimal performance indeed.
Enterprise-adjacent storage has been 4k capable for about a decade. Capable Optane and NAND drives can be easily be converted with the “nvme” command on Linux. Notably, the Optane 905p that is reasonably common has no 4k support.
 
Joined
Jul 30, 2019
Messages
3,024 (1.61/day)
System Name Not a thread ripper but pretty good.
Processor Ryzen 9 5950x
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi (revision 1.06, BIOS/UEFI version P5.50)
Cooling EK-Quantum Velocity2, EK-Quantum Reflection PC-O11, D5 PWM, EK-CoolStream PE 360, XSPC TX360
Memory Micron DDR4-3200 ECC Unbuffered Memory (4 sticks, 128GB, 18ASF4G72AZ-3G2F1) + JONSBO NF-1
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 5700 & EK-Quantum Vector Radeon RX 5700 +XT & Backplate
Storage Samsung 2TB & 4TB 980 PRO, 2TB 970 EVO Plus, 2 x Optane 905p 1.5TB (striped), AMD Radeon RAMDisk
Display(s) 2 x 4K LG 27UL600-W (and HUANUO Dual Monitor Mount)
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic Black (original model)
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
Mouse Logitech M575
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB MK.2
Software Windows 10 Professional (64bit)
Benchmark Scores Typical for non-overclocked CPU.
Your random access speed/latency will be orders of magnitude slower, even with VROC backed mdraid on Linux (semi-hardware).
What would be the best (free) windows tool for measuring the speed/latency?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
3,257 (1.58/day)
Location
UK, Midlands
System Name Main PC
Processor 13700k
Motherboard Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 Gig 3200CL14
Video Card(s) 4080 RTX SUPER FE 16G
Storage 1TB 980 PRO, 2TB SN850X, 2TB DC P4600, 1TB 860 EVO, 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-9
Power Supply Antec HCG 750 Gold
Software Windows 10 21H2 LTSC
How much are you guys paying for these drives? I noticed an upturn in people saying they buying them.

No stock on amazon, some on ebay used, I checked where I got my DC P4600 from and its silly money.

I *almost* pulled the trigger on a 1.9TB 905P for <$400. Realized that I have 'enough' to 'play with' as-is, and if I'm lucky can score something better on the used market, later.
Here 240gig optane's cost more then that. Guessing its one of those things where its cheaper to import and pay tariffs on.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2024
Messages
32 (0.16/day)
System Name Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Laptop
Processor Intel i5-13420H
Motherboard Lenovo LNVNB161216
Memory 2x8GB DDR5 5200MHz (mismatched)
Video Card(s) RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Storage Intel Optane P1600X 118GB + Samsung PM9A1 1TB
Display(s) 1920x1080 144Hz
Mouse Logitech G203
Best setting for Optane specifically or ssd generally? I seem to remember regular nvme drives cannot do lower than 4KiB, whereas Optane can. I’d be curious to see real world difference indeed if any but cannot really make an educated guess about that. I’m thinking the default sector size is attributed by operational capabilities but might not be optimal in Windows.

I do remember back in the hdd/win 7 era that it was optimal to force a 4KiB sector when partitioning, the theory long lost to me since except that it was supposed to be optimal performance indeed.
For both Optane and NAND drives, 4096B is supposed to be preferable, but 512B is the default. The P1600X, at least, supports both.

How much are you guys paying for these drives? I noticed an upturn in people saying they buying them.

No stock on amazon, some on ebay used, I checked where I got my DC P4600 from and its silly money.


Here 240gig optane's cost more then that. Guessing its one of those things where its cheaper to import and pay tariffs on.
I paid $65 for the 118GB back when it was available on Amazon. Only other place I saw them was Newegg.

The entreprise-level 905P/P4800X/P5800X and so on are much more expensive (and usually not available as M.2). The 3.2GB version is even available on Mouser if you have $6500 to spare.
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
21,229 (3.40/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024
Unfortunately Intel NAND and Optane drives become read-only once they reach 100-105% of their rated TBW.

So trying to speed run the 1300TBW rating isn’t recommended. Even if the media itself can last far beyond that rating.
I thought that was only on enterprise optane, and that even there, later models just speed throttled when you hit this threshold?

The entreprise-level 905P/P4800X/P5800X
Small correction. 905p is considered a consumer part.

The 3.2GB version is even available on Mouser if you have $6500 to spare
Actually no. It's nonstocked but they can get one for you (in 6 weeks).

Only other place I saw them was Newegg.
There was a sale going on there with a glut of 905ps with oddly recent manufacture dates on them yeah. I got one.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2023
Messages
784 (1.43/day)
System Name Never trust a socket with less than 2000 pins
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
4,912 (3.85/day)
Location
Colorado, U.S.A.
System Name CyberPowerPC ET8070
Processor Intel Core i5-10400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B460M DS3H AC-Y1
Memory 2 x Crucial Ballistix 8GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Storage Boot: Intel OPTANE SSD P1600X Series 118GB M.2 PCIE
Display(s) Dell P2416D (2560 x 1440)
Power Supply EVGA 500W1 (modified to have two bridge rectifiers)
Software Windows 11 Home
Last edited:
Top