• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Palit GTX 750 Ti StormX Dual 2 GB

W1zzard

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
28,638 (3.74/day)
System Specs
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Palit's new GTX 750 Ti StormX Dual comes with the fantastic power consumption improvements of the Maxwell architecture, but also includes a large overclock out of the box. Additional overclocking potential is also excellent, making this the card you want if you are after maximized performance.

Show full review
 
Last edited:
I got these cards:
MSI GTX 750 Ti Gaming 2048M
NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti 2048M
ASUS GTX 750 Ti OC 2048M
ASUS GTX 750 OC 1024M
Palit GTX 750 Ti StormX Dual 2048M
MSI GTX 750 Gaming 1024M

2 more reviews today, the rest either today or tomorrow
 
wow, when you put it up agianst a 660 or 660ti, besides the power savings, one must wonder where the high score comes from??? even overclocked it gets spanked by 15%+ in bf3 .... this is not making me hopeful for this generation....
 
badtaylorx said:
wow, when you put it up agianst a 660 or 660ti, besides the power savings, one must wonder where the high score comes from??? even overclocked it gets spanked by 15%+ in bf3 .... this is not making me hopeful for this generation....
Click to expand...

Dude have you compared the gpu config of those 3 cards you mentioned?
l5k6O4v.png
 
Well for a straight-up plug-n-play decent price if it holds, (as why the reference is as W1zz said priced to high), such reference Sku's will dematerialize and it will be these semi-custom OC's that will surplant that. Let's see if the 6-pin versions can provide higher clocks and then more additional OC’s.

Here's the problem Nvidia knows AMD won’t have any "War Chest" of R7 265’s to counter and those will get swirled up in that whole Litecion frenzy that makes even the 270’s become just plain stupid crazy pricing at least here in the States. This will mean Nvidia will have all the TOP, FTW, Superclock version (with a 6-pin?) and like $180 pricing (or more?). Those higher-end binned chips they offer at significant increase in pricing to AIB’s. I’d go as far as to say Nvidia pricing for any of these GM107 doesn’t leave never as much "on the bone", given its' size. But hey, AIB’s needed something to sell given where Nvidia's entry-mainstream segment has been on the respirator for a long time... it's something.
 
Last edited:
I wish this card was 1-2cm shorter.
 
I wonder what's the reason for the outstanding performance of this card in Crysis 3.
 
Here's the thing as much as this efficiency is welcome in the desktop upgrade market it's not the end all. What you have from a similar size chip as Bonaire is a 40% improvement in perf/w, though perhaps only 10% improvement in true performance. Raising one bar without the other is only truly movement in one matrix. It's good... but BfB is the utmost in this entry/mainstream segment and for that Nvidia didn't do enough.
 
Casecutter said:
This will mean Nvidia will have all the TOP, FTW, Superclock version (with a 6-pin?) and like $180 pricing (or more?).
Click to expand...
Nice to see your wildly inaccurate pricing estimations continues. I vote we make it a weekly feature at TPU.
EVGA 750 Ti SuperClocked $150
EVGA 750 Ti FTW $160
It took less time to find the pricing that it likely took you post your "estimate"....nice to see you're putting your usual amount of effort into posting.
 
Last edited:
MSI Taiwan sent me "$199" this morning, which is what I had to go by before launch.

If the card stays at $160 it's certainly more interesting, but still a tad expensive.
 
Um, is there a reason why you're using a 4 month old driver to test? I mean, with the release of the 750 ti literally today, wouldn't updating to the most recent drivers (which just happen to also be released today and includes support for the 750 and 750 ti, surprise surprise) be a more accurate test?
 
John Smith said:
Um, is there a reason why you're using a 4 month old driver to test? I mean, with the release of the 750 ti literally today, wouldn't updating to the most recent drivers (which just happen to also be released today and includes support for the 750 and 750 ti, surprise surprise) be a more accurate test?
Click to expand...
Yes. Unfortunately I do not have a time machine. So I can't have used today's drivers to benchmark last week, so I can have the reviews ready today.

How long do you estimate it takes me to run 31 graphics cards through 16 benchmarks each at 4 resolutions each ?
 
Last edited:
This card would fly with a core/mem config of, say 1300M/7GHz with a 6-pin connector. I think that is what GTX 750 Ti should have been in the first place, while retaining its $149 price tag. To show off magical power efficiency, they could have kept the GTX 750 Ti (now) as the GTX 750, and renamed the GTX 750 (now) to GTS 750. Just saying, that's what I think.
 
Over_Lord said:
To show off magical power efficiency, they could have kept the GTX 750 Ti (now) as the GTX 750, and renamed the GTX 750 (now) to GTS 750. Just saying, that's what I think.
Click to expand...
I thought about that, too, but I guess they want to sell GM108 for lower end GTS and GT
 
W1zzard said:
Yes. Unfortunately I do not have a time machine. So I can't have used today's drivers to benchmark last week, so I can have the reviews ready today.

How long do you estimate it takes me to run 31 graphics cards through 16 benchmarks each at 4 resolutions each ?
Click to expand...
Ahhh, gotcha. Maybe in the future then?
 
John Smith said:
Ahhh, gotcha. Maybe in the future then?
Click to expand...
Definitely. I'm just waiting for new titles like Thief to be released to add them, then rebench with the latest WHQL drivers. Hopefully AMD will soon release theirs.
 
Now this is what I call an overclock.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top