• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PhysX on Radeon 'Saga': What we Missed

btarunr

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,669 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Specs
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Amidst this whole 'nGOHQ' saga, and us getting astonished at the way things turned out, here's what we missed:

NVIDIA is in talks with AMD over a possible technology-transfer agreement over PhysX, say industry sources in Hong Kong. In a not-so-recent article by HKEPC, it is said:

"The graphics card industry pointed out that while AMD Open Table support of Havok, but Havok has been the acquisition of Intel, Havok and PhysX is the same competition on the product, AMD has its own wishful thinking, by NVIDIA and Intel in physics engine Competition and get access to two major physics engine authorization, two competition is very likely to become the largest beneficiary of AMD." (Chinese, translated by Google into English).

AMD and NVIDIA are in discussions over a common ground that allows AMD to use the PhysX API with its products. This follows the news of AMD optimizing their hardware for Havoc. There are two implications to this:
  • AMD gets to an agreement with NVIDIA and ropes in PhysX, leaving their graphics processors optimized for both physics APIs, thereby making buying a Radeon product a better option over GeForce. A short-sighted look at things to come.
  • AMD plays risky, adopts PhysX, NVIDIA's developer relation programs popularize the PhysX API beyond Havoc (since now anyone can use it), eliminate Havoc, then hold a dominating position over AMD since PhysX would then become an indispensible technology for AMD, could affect the course of major corporate policies for AMD. A long-sighted look at things to come.
Whether AMD embraces PhysX at an official level remains to be seen, a lot is at stake. The industry never saw so much of a gamble because of a piece of software that makes crates break, grenade sharpnel fly and cloth tear more accurately.

With inputs from HKEPC

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kei
I must say Bta, that was one hell of a write up! Really got ya thinking on this all!
It's a huge gamble no matter what you look at it. Nvidia is doing the biggest because of the fact that they are showing their competitor their pride and joy. But, in ways helping them, because you never know what they can learn from ATI themselves.
We'll be gaining from this subject, that we will. But, at what cost will we have it? One company of video cards in the future?
 
ATI/AMD does hold the chips in the short term. However, if they actually consider this they should make Nvidia re-code all present and future TWIMTBP games to scale better with ATI cards in single and CF mode. Also, force them to support DX10.1 in ALL TWIMTBP games both present and feature. But ATI/AMD should give them a time line to get it done or else the deal is off!

So, if they are in a meeting ATI/AMD does have a short term bargaining chip they can use to get things rolling. In the long term ATI/AMD is in the position to play double agent between PhysX and Havok.

If Nvidia wants to embrace ATI/AMD then it should be a full embrace. Nvidia gets ATI/AMD full support with Cuda, ATI gets Nvidia full advertising support. This IMHO is a even trade! No ifs, ands or buts about it.
 
Last edited:
hahahaha very nice play by amd.. getting cuda(wasn't this already announced a few days ago? or i just predicted the future a few days ago 0_o) from nvidia, since nvidia wants to make cuda more popular in order to conter intel.. but then amd starts double playing it, taking in havoc, and seeing which one it wants, and possibly putting both things into its gpu... screwing over both intel and nvidia.. though i bet they'll be forced to pick one.. but double dealing will definently help them pick the best deal.. well played amd.. well played.
 
i know that hong kong belongs to china but its best that you call it hong kong :D
 
A simply amazing turn of events if I do say so myself. AMD has really stepped it up with everything. I think this is just a first few steps and eventually, the biggest thing of theirs, their cpus, will come full circle and be right back up there on top if not the number 1 chip again :D.

Seriously, this is awesome stuff though. To think that know we get Physx (instead of the long ago post of ATI having a 3rd video card just for physics) using Nvidias tried and true R&D.
 
Thank heavens you quoted the source! (Chinese, translated by Google into English). Before I read that, I thought you had eaten too much curry!
 
My Honest Opinion, Id rather See AMD support Both standards, incase Nvidia Tries to Pull Support for Physx/CUDA. That would leave them with Options of adaptability, Because I still smell a Big Dirty Rat from nvidia.
 
isn't it like y intel gave AMD x86 architecture ?

although i may be wrong, dont know the history that much. if someone could enlighten me .
 
WOW . . .


I mean, damn, if nVidia isn't feeling truly pressured to make some drastic moves recently . . .


this is wonderful news for us consumers, though.


But, I think this move will greatly benefit AMD/ATI in the long run, while allowing nVidia to shoot themselves in the foot . . . my reasoning being that if nVidia are hoping that they can push market support for PhysX enough to run out Havok and Intel, we have to take into account they'd be pushing against Intel while AMD/ATI would still be supporting Havok as well . . . AMD/ATI stands to become the dominant physics capable hardware here over either Intel or nVidia, which will only continue to benefit them further down the road, and could potentially hurt nVidia hardware sales as well.


Either way, no matter what the red camp decides to do, they can't go wrong :toast:
 
imperialreign said:
WOW . . .


I mean, damn, if nVidia isn't feeling truly pressured to make some drastic moves recently . . .


this is wonderful news for us consumers, though.


But, I think this move will greatly benefit AMD/ATI in the long run, while allowing nVidia to shoot themselves in the foot . . . my reasoning being that if nVidia are hoping that they can push market support for PhysX enough to run out Havok and Intel, we have to take into account they'd be pushing against Intel while AMD/ATI would still be supporting Havok as well . . . AMD/ATI stands to become the dominant physics capable hardware here over either Intel or nVidia, which will only continue to benefit them further down the road, and could potentially hurt nVidia hardware sales as well.


Either way, no matter what the red camp decides to do, they can't go wrong :toast:
Click to expand...

That is true. No, matter what, Red does come out good in the end. For all we know, if AMD/ATI does decide to go with PhysX then Intel might say we have Havoc and F you... Then that might hurt them... It's a big circle. And, it might be a big circle with links of foots up their butts.
 
Cold Storm said:
That is true. No, matter what, Red does come out good in the end. For all we know, if AMD/ATI does decide to go with PhysX then Intel might say we have Havoc and F you... Then that might hurt them... It's a big circle. And, it might be a big circle with links of foots up their butts.
Click to expand...

TBH, I don't think Intel is in anymore of a position to drop AMD/ATI from Havok, not if Intel wants to be able to make a stand against PhysX.

Sure, Intel can have a whole CPU core dedicated to physics processing, but it still can't do it anywhere near as efficient as a GPU could. Havok would start becoming burdensome and overbearing to use if you had to rely on a CPU core; for Intel to be able to compete on a hardware level, they need ATI GPU support.
 
imperialreign said:
TBH, I don't think Intel is in anymore of a position to drop AMD/ATI from Havok, not if Intel wants to be able to make a stand against PhysX.

Sure, Intel can have a whole CPU core dedicated to physics processing, but it still can't do it anywhere near as efficient as a GPU could. Havok would start becoming burdensome and overbearing to use if you had to rely on a CPU core; for Intel to be able to compete on a hardware level, they need ATI GPU support.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you have a point there. It's just so soon in the thought process... All we can do is sit here with popcorn and watch.
 
We can't help but feel sorry for AMD FireStream and its own GPGPU architechture. CUDA will kill it.
 
btarunr said:
We can't help but feel sorry for AMD FireStream and its own GPGPU architechture. CUDA will kill it.
Click to expand...

I forgot all about FireStream. IT doesn't look good at all for that. But, just like betamax and vcr, CD and tape, you won't know till it goes on and happens.
 
ya apparently betamax was ahead of its time, picture clarity was higher, just that VHS became popular
 
usually how it goes
 
i want know what is the end story of physics
 
So, AMD is the can of whoop Ass that Nvidia is opening :laugh:
 
Last edited:
btarunr said:
....on itself.
Click to expand...
and it hopes to take Intel down along with itself, then Intel Nvidia merge to create 2 companies one can.
 
So i guess you can get 50gb blue ray pr0n dics then :D viva la vhs.

was/is firestream any good? and have ati gone anywere with it or is it just a model.
 
As far as i know licensing PhysX for use on ATi cards would be possible. I mean tech wise its easy to make drivers for ATi cards, Nvidia could make a lot of money and gain market share.

The only way Nvidia will make money from PhysX is to license it because the graphics drivers are free and there is no ppu to buy anymore.

Still id like to see a graphics card dedicated to physics, so you get get a lower model and use that for PhysX. Tri SLi you could have 2 good cards and a crappy one for PhysX.

If they License out Physx to other people they can make a bomb in cash, plus its easy to implement into games.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top