Post your Cinebench R23 Score

[phanbuey]

almost 5k

4.6 - daily clocks.

 

[newtekie1]

My Celeron N2930@2.165GHz for the LOLs:

 

[T4C Fantasy]

if your submission did not appear on the leaderboard its simply because you did not display cpu-z in your submission, either that or im busy.

 

[Pumper]

My silicon lottery losing 4.2GHz 4770K doing work, lol.
Cooled with Dark Rock Pro 2.

 

[oxrufiioxo]

Cooled with a Corsair h150i Pro in Push/Pull.

 

[DR4G00N]

4770K @ 4.5GHz

 

[phanbuey]

Cooled with a Corsair h150i Pro in Push/Pull.View attachment 118056

wew... that is something -- that single core too

 

[oxrufiioxo]

wew... that is something -- that single core too

I originally was going to go with your CPU last year. I really like the EE platform. My previous Cpu was a 5820k at 4.5ghz.

 

[Vayra86]

4.7 Ghz all core 8700K.

EDIT: with CPUZ

 

[er557]

the new version seems to use more avx extensions, and the score layout calculation is different, more single thread in the mix

 

[catulitechup]

This tests will be make it with windows 8.1 for probe avx influence in cinebench R15 and R20

No-AVX (Enable AVX: bcdedit /set xsavedisable 0 - Disable AVX: bcdedit /set xsavedisable 1)

R15

R20

AVX

R15

R20

Around 100 points more than ryzen 2xxx at 4.3ghz

 

[Tomgang]

Old abused cpu incoming.
I7 980X @ 4.4 GHz air cooled.

This tests will be make it with windows 8.1 for probe avx influence in cinebench R15 and R20

No-AVX (Enable AVX: bcdedit /set xsavedisable 0 - Disable AVX: bcdedit /set xsavedisable 1)

R15

R20

AVX

R15

R20

Around 100 points more than ryzen 2xxx at 4.3ghz

Why are you running only 3 cores?

 

[catulitechup]

Why are you running only 3 cores?

Hi

In this post explain more about this

Easy dont need more than 3 cores on my work, only need frecuency*

And use noxsave setting on kernel aka no avx, without avx and 1 core less give better temperatures than coolermaster hyper t4 on shorter case (only have 90mm rear cooler)

Actually upgrade tower and now support 120mm rear cooler, and now have artic cooling 120mm and heatsink upgraded to zalman cnps 10x performa+

This is some images refer tower:

Old case

New case

 

[Tomgang]

Hi

In this post explain more about this

Alright. So you have just configured your system to your needs.

 

[catulitechup]

Alright. So you have just configured your system to your needs.

Sadly actually dont appear cpu with few cores and high single thread: dual core + ht is lower than tri core

Before i3 used pentium G3258 @ 4.1ghz with artic cooling alpine 11 plus

 

[R00kie]

9900K@5GHz custom water

 

[agent_x007]

Air cooling.

 

[sam_86314]

Reran the benchmark using the portable download from TPU. Also included CPU-Z benchmark.
Main PC: 2600X (XFR and PBO enabled), Cryorig R1 Ultimate.

Main Laptop: 6500T stock speed, air cooled

Auto post combining is annoying...

 

[Deleted member 50521]

Office potato PC

 

[Steevo]

Not sure why its not showing my bar for the score? Also liquid cooled system.

 

[mat9v]

@T4C Fantasy
My score is with watercooling (AiO) and the 4348Mhz is a peak frequency, the benchmark was running at maybe 4148-4123Mhz on all cores with 4123Mhz prevailing as the core temp rose over 60C - it is not an OC like the entry in the table suggests, it is stock with XFR and PBO enabled.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

@T4C Fantasy
My score is with watercooling (AiO) and the 4348Mhz is a peak frequency, the benchmark was running at maybe 4148-4123Mhz on all cores with 4123Mhz prevailing as the core temp rose over 60C - it is not an OC like the entry in the table suggests, it is stock with XFR and PBO enabled.

you need to explain the details in ur post because im putting peak. you can explain averages. thats what the score link is for its for when ppl want more info

 

[Vayra86]

the new version seems to use more avx extensions, and the score layout calculation is different, more single thread in the mix

Nice, so all those 'AVX multipliers' show up

Can already see one possible score that has an AVX multiplier reduction, @newtekie1 seems to score lower while being clocked 100mhz higher than me. I'm curious - is that the reason? Or perhaps a difference in RAM? Its too big a gap for margin of error.

FYI; my 4.7 OC is always a 4.7 allcore irrespective of load.

you need to explain the details in ur post because im putting peak. you can explain averages. thats what the score link is for its for when ppl want more info

Kudos for keeping the scores and the way you do it

 

[Deleted member 178884]

2518cb multi thread
519cb single thread
Cooling : Alphacool eisbaer 360mm
OC : 5ghz 1.3v all cores 7740x x299 gaming carbon

Edit: My single thread is doing pretty damn nice, though my 7740x can do 5.1ghz there's no much point with the voltage increase and the cl14 2400mhz corsair kit I use is holding it back anyways likely.
Also CPU-Z screens added:

 

[Ferrum Master]

At home.