Post your Cinebench R23 Score

[Dinnercore]

I found myself playing around with an oddball that no one seems to like: The i9 10900X
Poor CPU gets all the hate as it has some horrible price/performance compared to other CPUs available from both intel and AMD. On top of that its not even the same die as the higher core-count 109XXX-Series and has the most inferior silicon quality as it seems. Reviewers had trouble clocking it anywhere near as high as the higher core parts.
And it struggles to find a good real-world use case. For production workloads it lacks in threads, for gaming its worse then a 9900K due to less single thread power while being more expensive. I still love it.



I wonder, does CB20 use AVX? Because I set an AVX-offset in bios but when monitoring clocks during the benchmark it never dropped.

 

[Not.Another.Gaming.Stream]

Nothing to see here. two tests run back to back. Results shown here are the second test on air using stock Wraith Prism Cooler. 64GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo 3600Mhz with CL 16-19-19-39 (Hynix C) doesn't like a single step above the stock clocks without flipping out.

 

[phill]

What cooling are you using @Not.Another.Gaming.Stream ??

 

[T4C Fantasy]

updated submission rules, while I may not update this often some cpus catch my eye and I will add, too often when people screenshot their cpu-z the clocks are at idle.

 

[Wing]

Evening everyone! Just built a new computer in the past few days. Been enjoying my first foray into the AMD space in almost two decades. I attached an image of my best bench-to-date at 7284. I'm using a Noctua NH-D15 air cooler. The 140 mm fan that comes with the with the cooler is located in the center slot. To accommodate my RAM, I replaced the second fan with an NF-A12X25.

Also, I noticed some discussion above regarding the vcore of the Ryzen 9. I actually did a sweep of offset voltages and compared to a set override of 1.35V. All of those benchmarks were performed on fresh reboots with multiple tests taken at each point. The interesting finding here is that there is an ideal negative offset (and that the override led to a pretty substantial drop in performance in my case). I had one of my friends, who also has a 3900X, perform this voltage test, and he found the same thing. Might be worth scanning if you're looking for more oomph. That being said, I have to add some caution about the -0.15V offset. My friend's machine did not like this setting at all (with our guess being voltage-at-idle being problematic). Anyway! Take care.

After getting better acquainted with my 3900X, I decided to try some new BIOS configurations to see if I could improve on the score I posted in October.
I kept my -0.1 vcore offset, enabled PBO with manual limits of 250W, 120A, 200A for PPT, TDC, and EDC limits, respectively.
The overdrive scalar was set to 10X.
CPU Max Boost was enabled with the auto setting applied.

I'm still rocking the NH-D15 with the 140 + 120 mm fan arrangement.

Edit for clocks: stock clocks are still applied in this arrangement. For reference, during r20 running, all cores were sitting at ~4.25 GHz.

 

[thesmokingman]

After getting better acquainted with my 3900X, I decided to try some new BIOS configurations to see if I could improve on the score I posted in October.
I kept my -0.1 vcore offset, enabled PBO with manual limits of 250W, 120A, 200A for PPT, TDC, and EDC limits, respectively.
The overdrive scalar was set to 10X.
CPU Max Boost was enabled with the auto setting applied.

I'm still rocking the NH-D15 with the 140 + 120 mm fan arrangement.

Edit for clocks: stock clocks are still applied in this arrangement. For reference, during r20 running, all cores were sitting at ~4.25 GHz.

View attachment 154921

Looks like you spent a ton of time with PBO. You should try a ratio overclock. Below are my runs, stock, 4.2, 4.3, and ratio of 4.5 to 4.3 descending. Allcore and ratio voltages are 1.35v or under.

 

[Wing]

Looks like you spent a ton of time with PBO. You should try a ratio overclock. Below are my runs, stock, 4.2, 4.3, and ratio of 4.5 to 4.3 descending. Allcore and ratio voltages are 1.35v or under.

View attachment 154924

The physicist in me wanted to explore the full parameter space, and with my lab closed by human malware, I had the time.

Did you set your multiplier on the BIOS side, or were you fiddling around with Ryzen Master?

 

[thesmokingman]

The physicist in me wanted to explore the full parameter space, and with my lab closed by human malware, I had the time.

Did you set your multiplier on the BIOS side, or were you fiddling around with Ryzen Master?

I do it in bios.

 

[Fouquin]

Pair of Opteron 6238 Engineering Samples. Almost caught up to the 3.3GHz 6376s.

 

[Wing]

I do it in bios.

Thanks for giving me another parameter space to explore. Couldn't really get my 3900X to push beyond 4325 MHz. I guess I could have upped the voltage, but then we're just getting into a range that I'm not all that comfortable with. Normally I sit with a -0.1 V offset and, under full load, it parks around 1.225V. Anyhoo, still a fun exploration. Thanks for the prodding! 3900 club for life... or something.

 

[thesmokingman]

Thanks for giving me another parameter space to explore. Couldn't really get my 3900X to push beyond 4325 MHz. I guess I could have upped the voltage, but then we're just getting into a range that I'm not all that comfortable with. Normally I sit with a -0.1 V offset and, under full load, it parks around 1.225V. Anyhoo, still a fun exploration. Thanks for the prodding! 3900 club for life... or something.

View attachment 154956

For a ratio overclock, the first step is to figure out your comfortable voltage for the primary CCX, for ex. CCD0/CCX1. That would be first CCD and its first CCX. You do not use a -minus offset as it reduces low threaded clock situations. Rule of thumb is to stay under 1.35v which is a generally safe average FIT voltage. There are two types of voltage on Matisse, low threaded low load (ie single thread instances) and high thread high load (all core boost as in an R20 multi run). When the cpu raises voltage to 1.5v stock it is actually only putting that voltage to use on individual cores when there is a low threaded situation with load load, ie. running single core. Thus we find the max clock that 1.35v for instance will allow your CCD0/CCX1 to run at.

My chip can handle 45.5x on that CCX. The rest of the CCX cannot handle that so I lower the CCX multi until I find their stable spot. In my case multis I use end up like so 45/44/43/43 all at a max voltage of 1.35v. This way you get almost max single thread perf with very high multi threaded perf, best of both worlds. I don't bother with PBO at all, although I do raise power draw limits on cpu/soc/ddr and set vrms to extreme. I hope that makes sense.

All that said, I don't run an oc daily except just for tuning 9latency) ram and I leave voltage on auto. This nets me 7000 ish on average on R20 multi.

 

[ERazer]

all core 4.3 at 1.25v

 

[AsRock]

Just thought i would add mine tot he list.

 

[fsawma]

This is my first AMD CPU.

 

[marty360]

4.4@1.35v

 

[dprobkw]

Just did a 7621 with 3900x and Cinebench R20 all core OC to 4.3
Ram 3200mhz Oc'd to 3332 and set phases.

 

[Calmmo]

Testing a beta bios (F12f), getting ~100pts less than the previous bios

 

[Pantidria]

i7-3920XM, 4.29GHz, Air Cooling

 

[NoJuan999]

Testing a beta bios (F12f), getting ~100pts less than the previous bios

View attachment 156373

Sadly that seems to be the case for a lot of Ryzen 3000 owners.
My 3700x scored 5001 R20 multi on the AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABBA BIOS with Auto PBO but with the newer 1.0.0.4B AGESA BIOS I have to tweak my BIOS settings to get close to 5000 multi (4950-4975 are pretty common now for me with BIOS/PBO tweaks).
I can OC my 3700x to 4.35 GHz pretty easily on this BIOS though.

 

[thesmokingman]

Thanks for giving me another parameter space to explore. Couldn't really get my 3900X to push beyond 4325 MHz. I guess I could have upped the voltage, but then we're just getting into a range that I'm not all that comfortable with. Normally I sit with a -0.1 V offset and, under full load, it parks around 1.225V. Anyhoo, still a fun exploration. Thanks for the prodding! 3900 club for life... or something.

View attachment 154956

Coming back to this post late but man, you should not run over 1.325v longterm. Max FIT voltage for Matisse is 1.325v for high current loads, ie. many cores loaded. Negative voltage offset just prevents the chip from hitting max boost in low current loads. ie. single thread load. I just did a quickie comparo on another forum. I'll post them here for you. Both runs are with tuned ram at 3800/1900 IF. Personally I don't like running PBO because it is crude and can run your chip too far too long. Anyways as you can see below the ratio overclock beats an allcore in both multi and single core tests. It's like the best of both worlds.

4.3ghz all core

4.45-4.3ghz ratio

 

[Wing]

Coming back to this post late but man, you should not run over 1.325v longterm. Max FIT voltage for Matisse is 1.325v for high current loads, ie. many cores loaded. Negative voltage offset just prevents the chip from hitting max boost in low current loads. ie. single thread load. I just did a quickie comparo on another forum. I'll post them here for you. Both runs are with tuned ram at 3800/1900 IF. Personally I don't like running PBO because it is crude and can run your chip too far too long. Anyways as you can see below the ratio overclock beats an allcore in both multi and single core tests. It's like the best of both worlds.

4.3ghz all core

Oh, there are no worries there. The gains I get between my 24/7 configuration, PBO, and manual OC are pretty minimal in the grand scheme of things. The most aggressive thing I ever did produced 1.294V vcore under all-core load. In my 24/7 configuration, my vcore is 1.22-1.23V. At the end of the day though, I find that my 24/7 offset configuration will average 7280 in Cinebench r20. My PBO configuration sits around 7650, and my manual per-CCX settings pushed me into the low 7800s. I don't really need to run with those boosts all the time (or ever for that matter, lolz). I just wanted to see what could be achieved and reached the same conclusion as you. This CPU lets us have our cake and eat it too, which... is actually a really dumb saying because that is the point of having cake.

 

[heky]

@thesmokingman

So you are running 3 cores @ 4.45 and the rest @ 4.3, correct? Are you using Ryzen Master for this or do you set it in bios?

 

[thesmokingman]

@thesmokingman

So you are running 3 cores @ 4.45 and the rest @ 4.3, correct? Are you using Ryzen Master for this or do you set it in bios?

Yes, but it's actually one CCX, since one CCX is made up of 3 cores. It is done in bios. Memory is tuned and IF is 1900. This was a quick run at 1.325v and 10 mins P95 small stable.

 

[Rock N Roll Rebel]

I don't know if this works I haven't posted a image in a long time. I have all my bios settings on auto except memory

 

[turnado]

I'm not sure yet how far I can push these Dual Xeon E5-2630v2's. Aiming at 1080p@60fps YouTube live stream.