• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Post your CrystalDiskMark speeds

Kingston Q500 SSD / SATA III 2.5"

Called a HDD replacement on the packaging (10x faster!)
 

Attachments

  • KingstonQ500_SSD.png
    KingstonQ500_SSD.png
    34.2 KB · Views: 157
Hello! I was looking for some performance results of an old SATA 2 drive and found this table. This is amazing! So I had to register and bring some benchmarks. These are the "commercial" names of the drives from the screenshots:
  • Western Digital WD Blue 500 GB 5400 RPM 2.5'' SATA III HDD *
  • Western Digital Scorpio Blue 320GB 5400 RPM 2.5'' SATA 3 HDD *
  • HGST TravelStar Z5K1000 1TB 5400 RPM 2.5'' SATA II HDD
  • Seagate Barracuda 500GB 5400 RPM 2.5'' SATA III HDD *
  • Samsung SpinPoint HM641JI 640GB 5400 RPM 2.5'' SATA II HDD *
  • PNY XLR8 CS3030 1TB NVME 1.3 PCIe 3.0 x4 2280 SSD
The ones that have been connected via USB (mostly all HDD, the ones with an asterisk) have been connected using a USB 3.1 type A port with a SATA III to USB 3.0 connector from a Seagate Expansion carry case. The last 3 (the ones without an asterisk) have been connected to their respective NVME and SATA III ports in the laptop.

I will benchmark some other drives I have hanging around and post as soon as I can.

Edit: just read that it should have been CrystalDiskMark 6.0.2 results. Modified post based on it. Sorry!
 

Attachments

  • BENCHMARK RESULTS II.png
    BENCHMARK RESULTS II.png
    646.9 KB · Views: 417
Last edited:
Adding another benchmark, "Seagate Momentus 5400 500 GB 5422 RPM 2.5'' SATA II HDD".
 

Attachments

  • Seagate Momentus 5400 500 GB 5422 RPM 2.5''' SATA II HDD.png
    Seagate Momentus 5400 500 GB 5422 RPM 2.5''' SATA II HDD.png
    126.5 KB · Views: 363
@ezearis , do yourself a favor and get an (NVMe) SSD...:)
 
P4-630 said:
@ezearis , do yourself a favor and get an (NVMe) SSD...:)
Click to expand...
I literally have one (PNY CS3030 1TB PCIe Gen 3, don't have PCIe Gen 4 in my laptop so is the fastest I can use), is in the first reply. I'm just benchmarking several drives I have for archive purposes.
 
Put the m2 in the FM2 pc, not full speed but it'll work.

Ucdmarkm2.jpg
 
4x 4TB Western Digital Black SN750's in raid 0.
 

Attachments

  • CrystalDiskMark.jpg
    CrystalDiskMark.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 204
WD Black SN770 512GB :

1666580236377.png
 
1667151962126.png


Samsung 980 Pro 512GB
 
only acceptable settings to match everyone elses speeds
Untitled.png

Picture must show all formats like this

Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A / 256GB / SSD / SATA III <-- display like this (include HDD RPM speed please)
Maxtor DiamondMax 10 / 200GB / HDD / 7200 RPM / PATA 133
 
Last edited:
Tomgang said:
So you have zero speed on your drive. Jess slower than a awful old hard drive :p
Click to expand...
oh thats why you laughed, i was curious xD
 
T4C Fantasy said:
only acceptable settings to match everyone elses speeds

Picture must show all formats like this
View attachment 267848
Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A / 256GB / SSD / SATA III <-- display like this (include HDD RPM speed please)
Click to expand...
Are those default/NVME SSD settings or custom settings? On my 500GB NVMe drive the default and NVMe SSD settings are not like those?
I am checking to see if the default settings are different for 1TB NVMe?
 
The King said:
Are those default/NVME SSD settings or custom settings? On my 500GB NVMe drive the default and NVMe SSD settings are not like those?
I am checking to see if the default settings are different for 1TB NVMe?
Click to expand...
the settings have to match what the defaults were back when this benchmark started, so very customized yes.
 
WD_BLACK SN850X 1TB and 2TB

Screenshot 2022-10-30 172448.png
Screenshot 2022-10-30 171207.png
 
Last edited:
I kinda have 'SSDs: A History' going on in my rig. SATA, PCIe 3.0, PCIe 4.0 wave 1, PCIe 4.0 wave 2.
 

Attachments

  • ssds.jpg
    ssds.jpg
    239.7 KB · Views: 133
WD Black SN850 1TB, 1st image is NVMe setting enabled in CDM, 2nd image with it disabled/default
CrystalDiskMark_20221031015206.pngCrystalDiskMark_20221031015730.png
 
3x0 said:
WD Black SN850 1TB, 1st image is NVMe setting enabled in CDM, 2nd image with it disabled/default
View attachment 267913View attachment 267912
Click to expand...

How come the RND4k Q1T1 read is so much slower than the 512gb SN770 only a few posts above? that gets 93 in that section.

Yet, it is the cheaper model of the same line up... I don't understand, isn't RND4k Q1T1 read one of the more important numbers? So logic says, the SN850 should score higher there than the SN770... I am so confused...
 
CallandorWoT said:
How come the RND4k Q1T1 read is so much slower than the 512gb SN770 only a few posts above? that gets 93 in that section.

Yet, it is the cheaper model of the same line up... I don't understand, isn't RND4k Q1T1 read one of the more important numbers? So logic says, the SN850 should score higher there than the SN770... I am so confused...
Click to expand...
Less nand to do randoms on than 1TB more nand slower the speed because greater amount of space to do randoms over require slightly more time to do.
can alo come down to the controller used and the firmware optimisations done for each drive
 
Athlonite said:
Less nand to do randoms on than 1TB more nand slower the speed because greater amount of space to do randoms over require slightly more time to do
Click to expand...

ok, so its not really faster so to speak. i think i understand. thanks
 
updated requirement image to be more precise
Untitled (2).png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top