Post your CrystalDiskMark speeds

68Olds · Mar 19, 2023

Conner, that's a name I haven't seen in a long time. I had a few of them on the shelf, but I can't remember if they are still there or not. :confused:

CreeperJu · Mar 19, 2023

i5-13600KF - 64Gb of RAM 3600mhz - 990 PRO 1TB

A Computer Guy · Mar 19, 2023

TotallyRandomPerson · Mar 19, 2023

DR4G00N said:
The peak of performance.
Connor 210MB (386 era)

Wowwwws. I distinctly remember my Conner (120mb?) HD getting 700KB/s on a dx2-66 in (i think..) HD-tach. My mate then got a quantum fireball and it did like 1200KB/s on a dx2. I was well jealous. You, however, have surpassed this.

edit -- okay, can't find any pics of hdtach in dos, so maybe it wasn't that...

DR4G00N · Mar 20, 2023

TotallyRandomPerson said:
Wowwwws. I distinctly remember my Conner (120mb?) HD getting 700KB/s on a dx2-66 in (i think..) HD-tach. My mate then got a quantum fireball and it did like 1200KB/s on a dx2. I was well jealous. You, however, have surpassed this.

edit -- okay, can't find any pics of hdtach in dos, so maybe it wasn't that...

In ATTO it get's a more reasonable 700/600KB/s R/W.

Dee AF · Apr 15, 2023

x99 Xeons soldier on.

2x 1.5TB HGST HUSMM series SAS-3 12gbs SSDs on an HP 240 HBA (on a x99 based Dell workstation mobo

). CPU is a 14 core Xeon E5-2697 2.6/3.0 ("Haswell") with 40gb of DDR4 2133 (registered ECC). This is dedicated storage, the system is running on its own SATA SSD. Half of each disk is mirrored, half striped, using Windows LVM/StorageSpaces. The test shown is of the striped logical volume.

According to the thread instructions:

Defaults:

The NVME suite, for comparison:

These disks show up reliably on the 'bay as SAN pulls. I've never had any issues reformatting them with sg_utils when neccesary.

Performance with more queue depth and six threads (for more parallelism, to exercise the cores):

Significant boost to RND4K, but probably not meaningful for anything but development, virtual machine hosting, keeping up w/streaming I/O, etc.

E5 Xeons and x99 boards aren't quite as old as a 386, but still not bad for a platform that's nearing a decade.

Though I'd still like to figure out why I'm not exceeding 12gbps in sequential reads despite the striped volume having drives on different SAS-3 ports and the card being PCI-E 3 x8. Maybe an issue with the benchmark? Seems too coincidental to be limited right at the SAS3 bandwidth, allowing for a little overhead.

15th Warlock · Apr 17, 2023

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16, 2 Samsung 1TB in RAID 0

A Computer Guy · Apr 17, 2023

15th Warlock said:
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16, 2 Samsung 1TB in RAID 0
View attachment 291871

which samsung? NVMe PCIe 3 or 4? Hardware, firmware, or software RAID?

15th Warlock · Apr 17, 2023

Drives are NVMe 2x 1TB Samsung PM9A1s MZVL21T0HCLR-00$00/07, PCIe Gen 4 at 4x, came configured in RAID 0 out of the box in the firmware.

Tomgang · May 1, 2023

Two new drives added to my system. Other drives in my system can be seen in my older post here: https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/post-your-crystaldiskmark-speeds.250319/post-4566865

Samsung 980 PRO 1 TB nvme ssd added in for a comparison. 980 PRO has been in use for 2 years, so might have effected it´s maximum speed.
Else the two new drives are Samsung EVO 870 sata ssd with and with out rapid mode engade and a WD RED PRO 16 TB HDD.

Jean Bon Deparme · May 9, 2023

WD Blue SN570 1TB :

80CHF well spent.
How can I join the ranking ?

Mistakes_were_made · May 9, 2023

T4C Fantasy said:
[...]

"Seq Q32T1 (R/W)" Speeds are clickable, leading to the original post.

Name Drive Size Type RPM Connector Seq Q32T1 (R/W) Raid
mama SK hynix Platinum P41 1TB NVMe M.2 7372.7 / 6739.8
Det0x SK hynix Platinum P41 1TB NVMe M.2 7366.3 / 6519.1
mama Kingston 3000 1TB NVMe M.2 7355.7 / 6074.5

[...]

You have to check (delete) the 1st and 3rd place Benchmarks from Mama, because there are no Seq1M Q32T1 (R/W) in the linked screenshots.
They are Q8T1 and so the Scores are not for this SEQ1M Q32T1 highscore list.

Psychoholic · May 16, 2023

Left side: 980 Pro RAID 0 (2 X 2TB) -- D: drive
Right side : 4TB WD Black SN850X Single drive -- C: drive

A Computer Guy · May 16, 2023

Psychoholic said:
Left side: 980 Pro RAID 0 (2 X 2TB) -- D: drive
Right side : 4TB WD Black SN850X Single drive -- C: drive

View attachment 296113

Raid 0 via HBA, motherboard firmware, or software (like windows storage spaces?)

Psychoholic · May 16, 2023

A Computer Guy said:
Raid 0 via HBA, motherboard firmware, or software (like windows storage spaces?)

Striped in windows via software.

GumbyFace · Jun 5, 2023

Jean Bon Deparme said:
WD Blue SN570 1TB :

View attachment 295139

80CHF well spent.
How can I join the ranking ?

How did you manage to get 22GB/s from a drive with a max rating of 3GB/s?

Canned Noodles · Jun 5, 2023

GumbyFace said:
How did you manage to get 22GB/s from a drive with a max rating of 3GB/s?

And it only has a PCIe gen 3 interface. Is ram caching software being used? Is it an error? I am confused

GumbyFace · Jun 5, 2023

8 x Dell P5600 3.2TB Nvme drives in Raid 10:

This is the same 8 drives in Raid 0:

I am not sure why the speed numbers appear to be so slow given these drives cost $10k each and with 8 drives in raid 10 i would be expecting a 8x read and 4x write boost over a standard nvme drive (raid 0 would be 8x for both), so i was hoping someone here might have some advise to get my numbers up?

freeagent · Jun 10, 2023

My dirty and unkept SN850 boot:

New SN770 on a Gen 3 connection:

SN770 on Gen 4:

And the other SN770 on Gen 4:

I couldn't get the system to see all 3 SN770 on the Asus M.2 card. I am guessing I am bumping into a lane shortage :/

Edit:

I just noticed the test wasn't done running in the one shot :pimp:

The King · Jun 10, 2023

freeagent said:
I just noticed the test wasn't done running in the one shot

Your test settings are also incorrect like numerous others that post benhmarks in this thread.

Correct test setttings in this post.