Post Your TIMESPY, PCMARK10 & FIRESTRIKE SCORES! (2019)

[AlwaysHope]

Over 500 more points in PCMark10 with some extra tweaking.

 

[Marcus Vinicus]

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX video card benchmark result - Intel Core i9-13900K Processor,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt Z790-CREATOR WIFI (3dmark.com)

 

[AVATARAT]

7700x
6800 XT
2x32GB@6200MHz

Link result

 

[sounik]

The 3080 is overclocked for everyday use and the 5950x has a tuned pbo with tuned ram subtimings from Dram Calculator.

 

[Salty Maud]

My 12700kf 4070 system is apparently running pretty well in timespy. With afterburner my voltages were all over the place, switching over to EVGA Precision X1 gave me much more stable voltages and ~150 more graphics score. Daily settings. 5GHz p-core 3.9GHz e-core ring 40x, PL200W, 2 core boost to 5.2GHz. Ancient e-die 4x8GB kit @3466CL16 with reasonably tuned subtimings. GPU doing GPU things.

 

[mrcardio33x]

 

[mrcardio33x]

Top 3% R7 7800X3D / LLC: 6 / Scaler: X8 / + 100MHZ (SP: 92 / Cooler: 165)
Probably need a 2 dimmer to get much better..
RTX 4090 bone stock (OC: 39XXX)

VDD: 1.5v / VDDQ/IO: 1.35v / VSOC: 1.25v

 

[Petar666]

4090 @3090/12326MHz
i9-14900K-6.1Ghz

I scored 39 147 in Time Spy

Intel Core i9 processor 14900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

www.3dmark.com

 

[mrcardio33x]

 

[mrcardio33x]

5 of 4099

 

[Marcus Vinicus]

I scored 30 010 in Time Spy

Intel Core i9-13900K Processor, AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX x 1, 65536 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

www.3dmark.com

 

[fusseli]

Pulled ~660w at the outlet, can't wait for my 14900ks and ddr-7600

Result not found

www.3dmark.com

 

[fusseli]

Changed my ram from 7200 CL34 to 7800 CL36 and my cpu score went up ~700 points, otherwise 14700k is stock... I'm getting better cpu scores than some 13900k

Result not found

www.3dmark.com

 

[mrcardio33x]

 

[jackjoker]

ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 ROG STRIX


3DMark TimeSpy

3DMark FireStrike Ultra

3DMark Speed Way

3DMark Port Royal

 

[tugrul_SIMD]

 

[Nowt]

MSI X370 upgraded from 1070/1700/16gb to 4090/5800X3D/32gb

CPU : 5800X3D + Kombo Strike 3
Cooler : Dark Rock Pro 4
GPU : Suprim X 4090
RAM : Flare X 4x8 3200 CL14 @3600 16-18-18-38
Mobo : MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Case : Cooler Masterbox Lite
Storage : 2x 1Tb NVME 1x 1Tb HDD 1x 275Gb SDD
PSU : MSI A1000G PCIE5 1000W

Time Spy : https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/103590259

 

[mrcardio33x]

VDD: 1.44v VDDQ/IO: 1.30v Hynix A-Die

 

[fusseli]

I got my ram overclock dialed in and cpu score went up another ~50 points. Here's the CPU profile with 14700k stock:

I scored 0 in CPU Profile

Intel Core i7 processor 14700K, AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

www.3dmark.com

 

[Paramount]

my PCMARK10 results

 

[Gica]

Very interesting how the 7600X + 6900 XT tandem can be superior to the 7950X3D + RTX 4090 configuration.

 

[mrcardio33x]

Very interesting how the 7600X + 6900 XT tandem can be superior to the 7950X3D + RTX 4090 configuration.

What are you talking about...

How is a MUCH weaker CPU/ GPU somehow "superior"

According to a particular benchmark that doesn't actually translate to any real world benefit beyond perhaps being able to open an APP slightly quicker (utterly negligible), etc...

Not arguing that a lower end CPU / GPU make more sense depending on your use case but I just don't understand the point your trying to make here..

 

[Marcus Vinicus]

I scored 10 783 in PCMark 10

Intel Core i9-13900K Processor, AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX x 1, 65536 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

www.3dmark.com

CPU Profile
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX video card benchmark result - Intel Core i9-13900K Processor,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt Z790-CREATOR WIFI (3dmark.com)

 

[Gica]

What are you talking about...

How is a MUCH weaker CPU/ GPU somehow "superior"

According to a particular benchmark that doesn't actually translate to any real world benefit beyond perhaps being able to open an APP slightly quicker (utterly negligible), etc...

Not arguing that a lower end CPU / GPU make more sense depending on your use case but I just don't understand the point your trying to make here..

Try to see the irony of that post. I hope I'm not asking too much.
According to PCMark, "Premium gaming PC (2023)" means 7950X3D + RTX 4090.
The difference between the processors is enormous, and this benchmark does not highlight it.
For GPU, I see "gfx 1030" for RX 6900XT, one of the few "gaming" models that supports it (I think only 6900XT and 7600 have support). Why don't I see CUDA, OptiX, etc. on RTX 4090???? According to Puget reviews, the 4090 destroys the 6900XT in Content Creation. The 6900XT fights with the 3070/Ti in this chapter. With RTX activated, the 6900XT relegates to the RTX 3060 League in applications like Redshift or Blender.
A complex benchmark highlights at least part of these aspects. For a startup or videochat home user, bla bla bla, a Pentium 2c/4t is sufficient.

NVIDIA RTX 4070 and 4060 Ti (8GB) Content Creation Review

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and 4060 Ti (8GB) are the most recent additions to NVIDIAs consumer family of GPUs on their Ada Lovelace Architecture. How do they compare for content creation against their previous generation counterparts?

www.pugetsystems.com

My conclusion for these tests: Can you play Mario Bross - Commodore 64 Edition? Yes or not?

Update:
i5-13500 PL 95W (6P+8E=20t) versus i5-13500 "Pentium Mode" 2c/4t

 

[Paramount]

What are you talking about...

How is a MUCH weaker CPU/ GPU somehow "superior"

According to a particular benchmark that doesn't actually translate to any real world benefit beyond perhaps being able to open an APP slightly quicker (utterly negligible), etc...

Not arguing that a lower end CPU / GPU make more sense depending on your use case but I just don't understand the point your trying to make here..

don't underestimate the calculations of Single core performance in which most causal users need it esp. when you have nice silicon chip of CPU and well tuned RAM ( 53n latency )