- Joined
- Feb 17, 2010
- Messages
- 1,832 (0.33/day)
- Location
- Azalea City
System Name | Test Bench #3 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 8600G delidded, +200PBO -30CO |
Motherboard | B650M-HDV M.2 |
Cooling | Water, liquid metal |
Memory | VIPER ELITE |
Video Card(s) | 760M @3300MHz |
Storage | Samsung PM981 |
Display(s) | MAG401QR |
Case | Open Frame |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech Z623 |
Power Supply | EVGA P5 |
Mouse | Cooler Master MM710 |
Keyboard | Huntsman Elite |
Software | 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | https://hwbot.org/user/luke |
So what? Memory timing increase proportionally with the speed. CAS latency and true latency are 2 completelly different things.
Please read this article to understand in more details:
http://www.crucial.com/usa/en/memory-performance-speed-latency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAS_latency#Memory_timing_examples
![]()
As you can see, the Speed and Clock Cycle time are the ones that matter, not CAS timings. The bigger the frequency, the lesser Clock Cycle time is.
true latency (ns) = clock cycle time (ns) x number of clock cycles (CL)
The latest DDR4-4000Mhz have a true latency of 8.911ns.
My DDR3-2400CL9 is 7.5ns. I had some old DDR2 PIs that were 6.7ns (1200CL4). I think overall latency is getting worse. At least density and power draw is getting better though.