- Joined
- Feb 17, 2010
- Messages
- 1,787 (0.33/day)
- Location
- Azalea City
System Name | Main |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5950x |
Motherboard | B550 PG Velocita |
Cooling | Water |
Memory | Ballistix |
Video Card(s) | RX 6900XT |
Storage | T-FORCE CARDEA A440 PRO |
Display(s) | MAG401QR |
Case | QUBE 500 |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech Z623 |
Power Supply | LEADEX V 1KW |
Mouse | Cooler Master MM710 |
Keyboard | Huntsman Elite |
Software | 11 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | https://hwbot.org/user/damric/ |
So what? Memory timing increase proportionally with the speed. CAS latency and true latency are 2 completelly different things.
Please read this article to understand in more details:
http://www.crucial.com/usa/en/memory-performance-speed-latency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAS_latency#Memory_timing_examples
![]()
As you can see, the Speed and Clock Cycle time are the ones that matter, not CAS timings. The bigger the frequency, the lesser Clock Cycle time is.
true latency (ns) = clock cycle time (ns) x number of clock cycles (CL)
The latest DDR4-4000Mhz have a true latency of 8.911ns.
My DDR3-2400CL9 is 7.5ns. I had some old DDR2 PIs that were 6.7ns (1200CL4). I think overall latency is getting worse. At least density and power draw is getting better though.