- Joined
- Oct 28, 2012
- Messages
- 1,195 (0.27/day)
Processor | AMD Ryzen 3700x |
---|---|
Motherboard | asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming |
Cooling | Deepcool LS520 SE |
Memory | crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 3070 FE |
Storage | WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up |
Display(s) | LG GL850 |
Case | Dan A4 H2O |
Audio Device(s) | sennheiser HD58X |
Power Supply | Corsair SF600 |
Mouse | MX master 3 |
Keyboard | Master Key Mx |
Software | win 11 pro |
What was he supposed to say ? I clearly remember the clusterfuck that zen 3 on 300 series chipset was. AMD as a company initially refused to support it because many boards had an issue with the Bios chip size. Some boards could make the upgrade without issues, when many had to either cut on bios features, or older CPU support. MSI even had to launch the 400 series MAX motherboard to get the full support that a 400 chipset is supposed to have. Even when AMD backtracked they didn't gave it the full check, but a "selective beta bios update required". AMD and the board makers dropped the ball, that was a complex situation to solve, and ultimately happened because a LOT of people complained. Threadripper users weren't so lucky.Next "great moment" was Zen3 launch where he told everyone that there is no chance for Zen3 CPUs on 300-series chipset AM4 boards and then after 18 months, happy as a horny schoolboy, gave announcement that Zen3 is finally coming to 300 boards, that 18-month "evaluation" has been successful. That was enormous pile of horse$it as we all saw how Zen3 worked on some Gigabyte and ASRock 300 boards with no problems, few days after launch.
Like Raja K., good riddance Robert.
"Yhea so people higher than me in the company hierarchy decided to not support those chipset but I think that it's a load of bullshit"
Marketing lead somehow not getting fired for making an official statement that doesn't align with the company decision.